> On Sep 18, 2019, at 4:55 AM, list_em...@icloud.com wrote:
>
> I am using the Article class with the Roman font set to Utopia (Fourier). I
> believe that “Fourier” indicates a compatible math font, complementing Utopia.
>
> The integral signs for single and double integrals are different! I
On 2019-09-18, list_em...@icloud.com wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> I am using the Article class with the Roman font set to Utopia
> (Fourier). I believe that “Fourier” indicates a compatible math font,
> complementing Utopia.
> The integral signs for single and
I am using the Article class with the Roman font set to Utopia (Fourier). I
believe that “Fourier” indicates a compatible math font, complementing Utopia.
The integral signs for single and double integrals are different! I don’t think
this is correct typesetting. Is there a way to fix this or
Hello,
It appears that lyx (in fac probably texlive, does not like the fourier
font.
Typically in math mode and specially when it in \bm mode
and absolutely not in a title,
same issue when using color.
See attached file
Hello,
It appears that lyx (in fac probably texlive, does not like the fourier
font.
Typically in math mode and specially when it in \bm mode
and absolutely not in a title,
same issue when using color.
See attached file
Hello,
It appears that lyx (in fac probably texlive, does not like the fourier
font.
Typically in math mode and specially when it in \bm mode
and absolutely not in a title,
same issue when using color.
See attached file
