Dear all,
I've recently moved from Ubuntu to Fedora, and I've noticed that in this
latter distro .bst files are not where LyX looks for them. That is, they
are not in usr/share/texmf-texlive/bibtex but, rather, in
usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex. Texhash does not seem to make LyX
more aware
Richard Heck wrote:
LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try
ToolsTeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button.
Or the Recan button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect.
Jürgen
On 05/02/2011 10:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try
ToolsTeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button.
Or the Recan button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect.
Shouldn't we just rescan as
Yes, thanks a lot.
M
El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 10:03 -0400, Richard Heck escribió:
On 05/02/2011 09:14 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Dear all,
I've recently moved from Ubuntu to Fedora, and I've noticed that in this
latter distro .bst files are not where LyX looks for them. That is, they
Richard Heck wrote:
Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to
find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring,
but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved
to texlive a month or so ago
The argument not to do so was
I admit I had assumed that was the standard behaviour...
M
El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 10:10 -0400, Richard Heck escribió:
On 05/02/2011 10:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try
ToolsTeX Information, and then
On 05/02/2011 10:13 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to
find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring,
but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved
to texlive a
On 05/02/2011 10:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
It's very fast here. Under a second, I'd say.
Here (full TeXLive 2010 installation) it takes a bit longer, about 5-10 secs.
IMHO even this would be bearable.
Reconfigure takes a while, anyway.
I'll raise the issue on
I agree that UNITY is junk, so I simply restarted in ubuntu classic
(AKA gnome...) and all is fine.
EK
On 05/02/2011 02:32 PM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Natty crashed spectacularly twice -- the kind of crash that calls for a
reinstall. Even if it had been rock-solid, which for me it has not been,
Dear all,
I've recently moved from Ubuntu to Fedora, and I've noticed that in this
latter distro .bst files are not where LyX looks for them. That is, they
are not in usr/share/texmf-texlive/bibtex but, rather, in
usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex. Texhash does not seem to make LyX
more aware
Richard Heck wrote:
LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try
ToolsTeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button.
Or the Recan button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect.
Jürgen
On 05/02/2011 10:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try
ToolsTeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button.
Or the Recan button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect.
Shouldn't we just rescan as
Yes, thanks a lot.
M
El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 10:03 -0400, Richard Heck escribió:
On 05/02/2011 09:14 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Dear all,
I've recently moved from Ubuntu to Fedora, and I've noticed that in this
latter distro .bst files are not where LyX looks for them. That is, they
Richard Heck wrote:
Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to
find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring,
but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved
to texlive a month or so ago
The argument not to do so was
I admit I had assumed that was the standard behaviour...
M
El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 10:10 -0400, Richard Heck escribió:
On 05/02/2011 10:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try
ToolsTeX Information, and then
On 05/02/2011 10:13 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to
find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring,
but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved
to texlive a
On 05/02/2011 10:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
It's very fast here. Under a second, I'd say.
Here (full TeXLive 2010 installation) it takes a bit longer, about 5-10 secs.
IMHO even this would be bearable.
Reconfigure takes a while, anyway.
I'll raise the issue on
I agree that UNITY is junk, so I simply restarted in ubuntu classic
(AKA gnome...) and all is fine.
EK
On 05/02/2011 02:32 PM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Natty crashed spectacularly twice -- the kind of crash that calls for a
reinstall. Even if it had been rock-solid, which for me it has not been,
Dear all,
I've recently moved from Ubuntu to Fedora, and I've noticed that in this
latter distro .bst files are not where LyX looks for them. That is, they
are not in usr/share/texmf-texlive/bibtex but, rather, in
usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex. Texhash does not seem to make LyX
more aware
Richard Heck wrote:
> LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try
> Tools>TeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button.
Or the "Recan" button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect.
Jürgen
On 05/02/2011 10:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try
>> Tools>TeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button.
> Or the "Recan" button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect.
>
Shouldn't we just
Yes, thanks a lot.
M
El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 10:03 -0400, Richard Heck escribió:
> On 05/02/2011 09:14 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I've recently moved from Ubuntu to Fedora, and I've noticed that in this
> > latter distro .bst files are not where LyX looks for them. That is,
Richard Heck wrote:
> Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to
> find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring,
> but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved
> to texlive a month or so ago
The argument not to do so
I admit I had assumed that was the standard behaviour...
M
El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 10:10 -0400, Richard Heck escribió:
> On 05/02/2011 10:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Richard Heck wrote:
> >> LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try
> >> Tools>TeX Information,
On 05/02/2011 10:13 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to
>> find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring,
>> but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved
>> to
On 05/02/2011 10:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> It's very fast here. Under a second, I'd say.
> Here (full TeXLive 2010 installation) it takes a bit longer, about 5-10 secs.
> IMHO even this would be bearable.
>
Reconfigure takes a while, anyway.
I'll raise the issue
I agree that UNITY is junk, so I simply restarted in "ubuntu classic"
(AKA gnome...) and all is fine.
EK
On 05/02/2011 02:32 PM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Natty crashed spectacularly twice -- the kind of crash that calls for a
reinstall. Even if it had been rock-solid, which for me it has not
27 matches
Mail list logo
