tex2lyx minor tabular glitch

2006-02-09 Thread Sven Schreiber
Hi, given 1.3.7's capability to read tex2lyx output I've started to use it more often, and it's great. One thing I stumbled over today is that in the following line, \begin{tabular}{|p{0.8\textwidth}|} the tabular width is lost when opening the converted lyx file. -Sven

Re: tex2lyx minor tabular glitch

2006-02-09 Thread Georg Baum
Sven Schreiber wrote: Hi, given 1.3.7's capability to read tex2lyx output I've started to use it more often, and it's great. One thing I stumbled over today is that in the following line, \begin{tabular}{|p{0.8\textwidth}|} the tabular width is lost when opening the converted lyx file.

Re: tex2lyx minor tabular glitch

2006-02-09 Thread Sven Schreiber
Georg Baum schrieb: Sven Schreiber wrote: Hi, given 1.3.7's capability to read tex2lyx output I've started to use it more often, and it's great. One thing I stumbled over today is that in the following line, \begin{tabular}{|p{0.8\textwidth}|} the tabular width is lost when opening the

Re: tex2lyx minor tabular glitch

2006-02-09 Thread Georg Baum
Sven Schreiber wrote: If you mean, can I enter 80 in the dialog along with units text% to get the desired result, then yes. But that appears to be so obvious that I'm not sure I understood you correctly? I meant exactly that. You can have so much fun with the tabular dialog that I would not

tex2lyx minor tabular glitch

2006-02-09 Thread Sven Schreiber
Hi, given 1.3.7's capability to read tex2lyx output I've started to use it more often, and it's great. One thing I stumbled over today is that in the following line, \begin{tabular}{|p{0.8\textwidth}|} the tabular width is lost when opening the converted lyx file. -Sven

Re: tex2lyx minor tabular glitch

2006-02-09 Thread Georg Baum
Sven Schreiber wrote: Hi, given 1.3.7's capability to read tex2lyx output I've started to use it more often, and it's great. One thing I stumbled over today is that in the following line, \begin{tabular}{|p{0.8\textwidth}|} the tabular width is lost when opening the converted lyx file.

Re: tex2lyx minor tabular glitch

2006-02-09 Thread Sven Schreiber
Georg Baum schrieb: Sven Schreiber wrote: Hi, given 1.3.7's capability to read tex2lyx output I've started to use it more often, and it's great. One thing I stumbled over today is that in the following line, \begin{tabular}{|p{0.8\textwidth}|} the tabular width is lost when opening the

Re: tex2lyx minor tabular glitch

2006-02-09 Thread Georg Baum
Sven Schreiber wrote: If you mean, can I enter 80 in the dialog along with units text% to get the desired result, then yes. But that appears to be so obvious that I'm not sure I understood you correctly? I meant exactly that. You can have so much fun with the tabular dialog that I would not

tex2lyx minor tabular glitch

2006-02-09 Thread Sven Schreiber
Hi, given 1.3.7's capability to read tex2lyx output I've started to use it more often, and it's great. One thing I stumbled over today is that in the following line, \begin{tabular}{|p{0.8\textwidth}|} the tabular width is "lost" when opening the converted lyx file. -Sven

Re: tex2lyx minor tabular glitch

2006-02-09 Thread Georg Baum
Sven Schreiber wrote: > Hi, given 1.3.7's capability to read tex2lyx output I've started to use > it more often, and it's great. One thing I stumbled over today is that > in the following line, > > \begin{tabular}{|p{0.8\textwidth}|} > > the tabular width is "lost" when opening the converted

Re: tex2lyx minor tabular glitch

2006-02-09 Thread Sven Schreiber
Georg Baum schrieb: > Sven Schreiber wrote: > >> Hi, given 1.3.7's capability to read tex2lyx output I've started to use >> it more often, and it's great. One thing I stumbled over today is that >> in the following line, >> >> \begin{tabular}{|p{0.8\textwidth}|} >> >> the tabular width is "lost"

Re: tex2lyx minor tabular glitch

2006-02-09 Thread Georg Baum
Sven Schreiber wrote: > If you mean, can I enter 80 in the dialog along with units text% to get > the desired result, then yes. But that appears to be so obvious that I'm > not sure I understood you correctly? I meant exactly that. You can have so much fun with the tabular dialog that I would