two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)

Dear list, I have a problem regarding the biblatex package, especially my package which builds on top of biblatex.[1] Attached is a .lyx file which shows the problem. If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry, because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally

Re: two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)

Dominik Waßenhoven wrote: If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry, because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally and to resolve that @collection entry, a second bibtex run would be possible. Read: would be necessary. If I alter the .lyx

Re: two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)

Dominik Waßenhoven wrote: Any help is appreciated. A change in the source is needed in order to trigger this additional run. This is something that is doable for 1.6.1. Could you bugzilla it, please? Jürgen

two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)

Dear list, I have a problem regarding the biblatex package, especially my package which builds on top of biblatex.[1] Attached is a .lyx file which shows the problem. If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry, because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally

Re: two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)

Dominik Waßenhoven wrote: If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry, because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally and to resolve that @collection entry, a second bibtex run would be possible. Read: would be necessary. If I alter the .lyx

Re: two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)

Dominik Waßenhoven wrote: Any help is appreciated. A change in the source is needed in order to trigger this additional run. This is something that is doable for 1.6.1. Could you bugzilla it, please? Jürgen

two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)

Dear list, I have a problem regarding the biblatex package, especially my package which builds on top of biblatex.[1] Attached is a .lyx file which shows the problem. If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry, because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally

Re: two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)

Dominik Waßenhoven wrote: > If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry, > because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally > and to resolve that @collection entry, a second bibtex run would be > possible. Read: would be necessary. > If I alter the

Re: two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)

Dominik Waßenhoven wrote: > Any help is appreciated. A change in the source is needed in order to trigger this additional run. This is something that is doable for 1.6.1. Could you bugzilla it, please? Jürgen