Richard Heck schreef:
Dan Fitch wrote:
1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
make a "cross reference" to a section or subsection, without adding a
label? So the user might say "As defined in s. 10.91" without having
to go to section 10.91 and adding a label?
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I _really_ think this is a must have: I know someone else that
is willing to work with LyX and propose it to her teacher, but
having to tar/untar ... will make it _very_ difficult to accept.
Of course, you are right about the problem of
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On the other hand, I think Vincent was working on this problem a
while ago. I don't know how far he got.
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child
documents, etc.etc.
Richard Heck wrote:
> Dan Fitch wrote:
>> 1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
>> make a "cross reference" to a section or subsection, without adding a
>> label? So the user might say "As defined in s. 10.91" without having
>> to go to section 10.91 and adding a
Thanks to the list denizens for being incredibly helpful on this
thread, already, within the space of a single day. You folks rock, and
you obviously have a fierce love of your project!
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Charles de Miramon
wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>
>>
That has been some interesting insight at the workings of modern
legislature:)
Hello!
in my list of figures, the numbers of the figures are standing much too
close to the captions of the figures! what can i do?
niko
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Richard Heck wrote:
Yes, that's a major drawback ! But the .zlyx could be used as an
"export" file format to share with others, then one could just merge
back the .lyx embedded into the .zlyx : I see this as a way one can
use this feature, but some may want to use it
Uwe, Richard --
Many thanks.
I do need Docbook (I think), but the information of the wiki seems to be
rather out of date and/or confusing.
I'll start another thread for this I think and consolidate my thoughts.
Thanks again.
i
-- Original Message --
Received: 08:50 AM COT, 04/13/2009
to help sharing files, dropbox is excellent.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Etienne lepercq wrote:
> I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few time
> now.
> I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As LyX
> is
> much
Ian S. Worthington schrieb:
I do need Docbook (I think), but the information of the wiki seems to be
rather out of date and/or confusing.
I don't know anything about DocBook and therefroe ask you to improve the Wiki pages when you found
out how it works.
thanks and regards
Uwe
Just my two cents: Scientific Word was used to come with a utility
called Document Manager. It was able to pack everything in a .msg
file. The utility has a GUI that gives you options for choosing the
elements to include for the packing and other options during
unpacking. I think that we were
Niko Schwarz schrieb:
in my list of figures, the numbers of the figures are standing much too
close to the captions of the figures! what can i do?
Add this command to your document preamble:
\newcommand...@figure{\@dottedtocline{1}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Richard Heck wrote:
Yes, that's a major drawback ! But the .zlyx could be used as an
"export" file format to share with others, then one could just merge
back the .lyx embedded into the .zlyx : I see this as a way one can
use this feature,
Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
Just my two cents: Scientific Word was used to come with a utility
called Document Manager. It was able to pack everything in a .msg
file. The utility has a GUI that gives you options for choosing the
elements to include for the packing and other options during
unpacking.
I'm trying to find a content markup system (authoring and processing) that can
output to various formats. Something which can be both viewed and printed,
such as PDF, is probably a must, and something easily accessed online, such as
HTML is close behind. If I could also produce CHM (or similar)
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Ian S. Worthington
wrote:
>
> It also lists Lyx which seems a mature and usable tool for Latex,
> and produces highly attractive PDF documents. I read though that getting
> attractive HTML out of it is difficult.
>
I''m getting good
2009/4/13, Niko Schwarz :
>
> to help sharing files, dropbox is excellent.
>
> Hmm interesting idea : I'll try, even if it imply using a third-party tool.
I'll give it a try.
--
Sincerily
Ian S. Worthington wrote:
If I understand correctly I have to choose a target language for Lyx from the
start: I can't start off with Latex and then later decide to I want to target
DocBook, for example.
No, you can switch the documents. There may be some issues about how
different bits of
hmm. then i get this error message:
@figur...@dottedtocline{1}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
Your command was ignored.
Type I to replace it with another command,
or to continue without it.
niko
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Niko Schwarz schrieb:
>
> in my
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo