Re: Spellchecker

[Liviu Andronic]

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:23 AM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote:
 Yes, it does detect deliberately introduced errors inserted near the end of
 the document.  I was thrown off by the screen message that said it had
 reached the end of the document, when it clearly hadn't.  If it had said
 that there were no more errors, I would have understood.

Feel free to file an enhancement request on bugtracker. The message
perhaps does need polishing.

Liviu

 All is well.
 Thanks.

 Bill


 On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote:

 It's 2.0.5.1.  In playing with it a little more I came to the conclusion
 that this may just be the spellchecker's way of telling me that it found no
 more errors in the remainder  of the document.  Is that plausible?


 On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:11 AM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote:
  I'm trying to run the spellchecker on a document of about 23,000 words.
  It
  stops about halfway through, says it has reached the end of the
  document,
  and asks me if I want to start over from the beginning.  I've tried
  creating
  a new, shorter document consisting of the last half of my original, but
  I
  get the same message when I try to run the spellchecker starting at the
  beginning of it.  Any suggestions?
 
 What version of LyX?

 Liviu


 --
 Do you know how to read?
 http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
 http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
 Do you know how to write?
 http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail






-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail

Re: CJK only LyX can't do it

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Scott Kostyshak wrote:
 I can reproduce your problem (thank you for sending a minimal
 example). if you open your .lyx file and go to View Source you will
 see LyX Warning: uncodable character '氣'. To fix this, you can
 select the character and go to Edit  Text Style  Customized and set
 Language to Chinese. From now on, you can select text and right
 click and go to Language in the right-click menu (you couldn't
 before because there was only one language.

And additionally:

* Set the document encoding to Default

(as explained on lyx-devel already)

Actually, you should also be able to set it to Unicode (utf8) (which is nota 
bene not the same as Unicode (CJK)). But LyX had a bug and did not load the 
CJK package in that case; this is fixed meanwhile in the development trunk.

 On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Karl Linek k...@linek.at wrote:
  Now my question: Have you been ignored to by the LyX developers? What
  should I do now?

I do not have the impression that we have ignored your previous question.

However, none of the current LyX developers speaks or writes Chinese, Japanese 
or Korean, so nobody uses CJK for real work. This is why we rely on user 
feedback here.

Regards,
Jürgen

AMS math

[Steve Hnizdur]

Hi

I have noticed some curious behaviour recently which hopefully someone 
can shed light on.


In a document with Use AMS math package automatically set in 
Documents/Settings, when I enter  display maths and input x=y followed 
by cntl-Enter I get a new line with three boxes the middle one centred 
under the = sign.


In a document with Use AMS math package set in Documents/Settings, 
when I enter  display maths and input x=y followed by cntl-Enter I get a 
new line with only two boxes.


The only difference in the preamble is a \usepackage{amssymb} line.

Why does this settings difference affect the way array equations work?

Cheers

Steve

Rough draft: Demystifying ePub

[Steve Litt]

Hi all,

This is only half relevant on this list. See the rough draft of my new
web page, Demystifying ePub:

http://www.troubleshooters.com/ebooktech/epub_demystify.htm

If anyone decides to build a LyX to ePub converter, this tutorial gives
you knowledge of where everything goes. Of course, you'd still need to
parse LyX, and the LyX dang well better be all styles based, with no
ERT or fingerpainting. But this web page would make you confidently
aware of where your parsed material goes in the ePub.

I hope you like it.

SteveT

Steve Litt*  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance

Re: Spellchecker

[Liviu Andronic]

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:23 AM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote:
 Yes, it does detect deliberately introduced errors inserted near the end of
 the document.  I was thrown off by the screen message that said it had
 reached the end of the document, when it clearly hadn't.  If it had said
 that there were no more errors, I would have understood.

Feel free to file an enhancement request on bugtracker. The message
perhaps does need polishing.

Liviu

 All is well.
 Thanks.

 Bill


 On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote:

 It's 2.0.5.1.  In playing with it a little more I came to the conclusion
 that this may just be the spellchecker's way of telling me that it found no
 more errors in the remainder  of the document.  Is that plausible?


 On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:11 AM, William Hanson whan...@umn.edu wrote:
  I'm trying to run the spellchecker on a document of about 23,000 words.
  It
  stops about halfway through, says it has reached the end of the
  document,
  and asks me if I want to start over from the beginning.  I've tried
  creating
  a new, shorter document consisting of the last half of my original, but
  I
  get the same message when I try to run the spellchecker starting at the
  beginning of it.  Any suggestions?
 
 What version of LyX?

 Liviu


 --
 Do you know how to read?
 http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
 http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
 Do you know how to write?
 http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail






-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail

Re: CJK only LyX can't do it

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Scott Kostyshak wrote:
 I can reproduce your problem (thank you for sending a minimal
 example). if you open your .lyx file and go to View Source you will
 see LyX Warning: uncodable character '氣'. To fix this, you can
 select the character and go to Edit  Text Style  Customized and set
 Language to Chinese. From now on, you can select text and right
 click and go to Language in the right-click menu (you couldn't
 before because there was only one language.

And additionally:

* Set the document encoding to Default

(as explained on lyx-devel already)

Actually, you should also be able to set it to Unicode (utf8) (which is nota 
bene not the same as Unicode (CJK)). But LyX had a bug and did not load the 
CJK package in that case; this is fixed meanwhile in the development trunk.

 On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Karl Linek k...@linek.at wrote:
  Now my question: Have you been ignored to by the LyX developers? What
  should I do now?

I do not have the impression that we have ignored your previous question.

However, none of the current LyX developers speaks or writes Chinese, Japanese 
or Korean, so nobody uses CJK for real work. This is why we rely on user 
feedback here.

Regards,
Jürgen

AMS math

[Steve Hnizdur]

Hi

I have noticed some curious behaviour recently which hopefully someone 
can shed light on.


In a document with Use AMS math package automatically set in 
Documents/Settings, when I enter  display maths and input x=y followed 
by cntl-Enter I get a new line with three boxes the middle one centred 
under the = sign.


In a document with Use AMS math package set in Documents/Settings, 
when I enter  display maths and input x=y followed by cntl-Enter I get a 
new line with only two boxes.


The only difference in the preamble is a \usepackage{amssymb} line.

Why does this settings difference affect the way array equations work?

Cheers

Steve

Rough draft: Demystifying ePub

[Steve Litt]

Hi all,

This is only half relevant on this list. See the rough draft of my new
web page, Demystifying ePub:

http://www.troubleshooters.com/ebooktech/epub_demystify.htm

If anyone decides to build a LyX to ePub converter, this tutorial gives
you knowledge of where everything goes. Of course, you'd still need to
parse LyX, and the LyX dang well better be all styles based, with no
ERT or fingerpainting. But this web page would make you confidently
aware of where your parsed material goes in the ePub.

I hope you like it.

SteveT

Steve Litt*  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance

Re: Spellchecker

[Liviu Andronic]

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:23 AM, William Hanson  wrote:
> Yes, it does detect deliberately introduced errors inserted near the end of
> the document.  I was thrown off by the screen message that said it had
> reached the end of the document, when it clearly hadn't.  If it had said
> that there were no more errors, I would have understood.
>
Feel free to file an enhancement request on bugtracker. The message
perhaps does need polishing.

Liviu

> All is well.
> Thanks.
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, William Hanson  wrote:
>>
>> It's 2.0.5.1.  In playing with it a little more I came to the conclusion
>> that this may just be the spellchecker's way of telling me that it found no
>> more errors in the remainder  of the document.  Is that plausible?
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Liviu Andronic 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:11 AM, William Hanson  wrote:
>>> > I'm trying to run the spellchecker on a document of about 23,000 words.
>>> > It
>>> > stops about halfway through, says it has reached the end of the
>>> > document,
>>> > and asks me if I want to start over from the beginning.  I've tried
>>> > creating
>>> > a new, shorter document consisting of the last half of my original, but
>>> > I
>>> > get the same message when I try to run the spellchecker starting at the
>>> > beginning of it.  Any suggestions?
>>> >
>>> What version of LyX?
>>>
>>> Liviu
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Do you know how to read?
>>> http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
>>> http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
>>> Do you know how to write?
>>> http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail
>>
>>
>



-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail

Re: CJK only LyX can't do it

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I can reproduce your problem (thank you for sending a minimal
> example). if you open your .lyx file and go to "View Source" you will
> see "". To fix this, you can
> select the character and go to Edit > Text Style > Customized and set
> Language to "Chinese". From now on, you can select text and right
> click and go to "Language" in the right-click menu (you couldn't
> before because there was only one language.

And additionally:

* Set the document encoding to "Default"

(as explained on lyx-devel already)

Actually, you should also be able to set it to "Unicode (utf8)" (which is nota 
bene not the same as "Unicode (CJK)"). But LyX had a bug and did not load the 
CJK package in that case; this is fixed meanwhile in the development trunk.

> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Karl Linek  wrote:
> > Now my question: Have you been ignored to by the LyX developers? What
> > should I do now?

I do not have the impression that we have ignored your previous question.

However, none of the current LyX developers speaks or writes Chinese, Japanese 
or Korean, so nobody uses CJK for real work. This is why we rely on user 
feedback here.

Regards,
Jürgen

AMS math

[Steve Hnizdur]

Hi

I have noticed some curious behaviour recently which hopefully someone 
can shed light on.


In a document with "Use AMS math package automatically" set in 
Documents/Settings, when I enter  display maths and input x=y followed 
by cntl-Enter I get a new line with three boxes the middle one centred 
under the = sign.


In a document with "Use AMS math package" set in Documents/Settings, 
when I enter  display maths and input x=y followed by cntl-Enter I get a 
new line with only two boxes.


The only difference in the preamble is a \usepackage{amssymb} line.

Why does this settings difference affect the way array equations work?

Cheers

Steve

Rough draft: Demystifying ePub

[Steve Litt]

Hi all,

This is only half relevant on this list. See the rough draft of my new
web page, Demystifying ePub:

http://www.troubleshooters.com/ebooktech/epub_demystify.htm

If anyone decides to build a LyX to ePub converter, this tutorial gives
you knowledge of where everything goes. Of course, you'd still need to
parse LyX, and the LyX dang well better be all styles based, with no
ERT or fingerpainting. But this web page would make you confidently
aware of where your parsed material goes in the ePub.

I hope you like it.

SteveT

Steve Litt*  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance