Re: Help improve LyX's defaults by sharing your preferences

2017-07-29 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:17:44PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > El 26.07.2017 a las 08:54, Scott Kostyshak escribió: > > > I see. We took a poll of users and got that the average preference is > > larger than 120. See: > > > > > >

Re: classicthesis-Lyx-v4.2_biblatex_biber

2017-07-29 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 29. Juli 2017 um 18:06:57, schrieb Michael Berger > Jürgen, > > I did as you told me > > - I installed all the groups of texlive packages Mageia is offering but > I don't know for certain whether or not "biber" is installed; I find no > way to look for a single

Re: all-inclusive file format

2017-07-29 Thread Roberto
On 29/07/2017 13:30, Charlie wrote: On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 12:55:35 +0200 Roberto wrote: Before answering think about your grandma having to do it ... Would she be happy to use msword? Charlie She does not use it, because it so unstable, which hinders her learning.

Re: classicthesis-Lyx-v4.2_biblatex_biber

2017-07-29 Thread Michael Berger
Jürgen, I did as you told me - I installed all the groups of texlive packages Mageia is offering but I don't know for certain whether or not "biber" is installed; I find no way to look for a single package called texlive-biber or texlive-biblatex - I did reconfigure several times - I

Re: classicthesis-Lyx-v4.2_biblatex_biber

2017-07-29 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am 29.07.2017 10:42 vorm. schrieb "Michael Berger" : BibTeX error: I found no \bibstyle command-while reading file ClassicThesis.aux If I force the PDf output everything looks fine except that there is no bibliography shown LogType LaTeX shows some warnings but no errors

Re: all-inclusive file format

2017-07-29 Thread Annaert Jan
I back Roberto on this one. Despite my pleas, some of my colleagues have already shied away from using LyX because of these unnecessary hurdles, and that’s a shame in my opinion as LyX has so much more to offer than MS Word and similar. And if word can “hide” a zip in a docx-file, perhaps it is

Re: all-inclusive file format

2017-07-29 Thread Charlie
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 12:55:35 +0200 Roberto wrote: > Before answering think about your grandma having to do it ... Would she be happy to use msword? Charlie -- Registered Linux User:- 329524 *** I had

Re: all-inclusive file format

2017-07-29 Thread Roberto
Make is your friend. I collaborate on dropbox with make-unfriendly computer-unsavvy people, make is not an option - and this is not such an uncommon case I guess! Instead, an _editable_ file format that __guarantees__ you have all is needed to compile the file is a haven for data

Re: all-inclusive file format

2017-07-29 Thread Roberto
The current lyx format then does just right for you. That does not mean that does right for everybody who uses the software. I hate MS Word too, but I also do not like having folders plenty of pictures that I have to carefully select when I pass the file to someone or share it in dropbox and

classicthesis-Lyx-v4.2_biblatex_biber

2017-07-29 Thread Michael Berger
Hi Philip, hi Jürgen, thanks for your comments and suggestions. Whatever I tried the compilation to PDF fails. I eventually tried Miede's original file once more - absolutely nothing added or removed, nothing changed. When trying to compile to PDF I get: BibTeX error: I found no \citation

Re: all-inclusive file format

2017-07-29 Thread Dr Eberhard W Lisse
Cool. el -- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini 4 > On 29 Jul 2017, at 07:00, Richard Heck wrote: > >> On 07/28/2017 07:47 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote: >> As an option, like "Compressed"? > > Yes, precisely. > > Richard > > >>> On 2017-07-27 18:48 , Richard Heck wrote: >>>

Re: all-inclusive file format

2017-07-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 07/28/2017 07:47 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote: > As an option, like "Compressed"? Yes, precisely. Richard > On 2017-07-27 18:48 , Richard Heck wrote: > [... >> I'll think more about this. It's too late for 2.3, but it's something >> that could go into 2.4. >> >> Richard > [...]

Re: crash

2017-07-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 07/28/2017 04:57 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I still have this issue with version 2.2.3 (on fedora 26) Unfortunately, this sort of crash report doesn't help us. With debug symbols activated, we can't really tell anything from this backtrace. If you could compile 2.2.3 yourself, and activate