This is probably a lyx bug:
./autogen.sh: OK
./configure: OK
make: fails
make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/sdc3/lyx-devel/src/mathed'
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src
-I../../images -I./../ -I../.. -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include
On 11-Oct-2000 Svante Signell wrote:
This is probably a lyx bug:
./autogen.sh: OK
./configure: OK
Just for all the people stuck out there with RedHat 7.0 I've installed
it yesterday on one of our spare PC's (as I like to test the stuff before
using it in production and my option is waiting
Hi!
I'm doing my bibliography manually, no use of
bibtex, cause I already had the list in ascii-form.
So I include the file to my lyx-doc and change the
env. to description, which is what I prefer for layout. BUT: Description sets
all items bold. Is there a way to having these items in
Chris Schulbert wrote:
I'm doing my bibliography manually, no use of bibtex, cause I already
had the list in ascii-form.
So I include the file to my lyx-doc and change the env. to
description, which is what I prefer for layout. BUT: Description sets
all items bold. Is there a way to having
This is probably a lyx bug:
./autogen.sh: OK
./configure: OK
make: fails
make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/sdc3/lyx-devel/src/mathed'
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src
-I../../images -I./../ -I../.. -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include
On 11-Oct-2000 Svante Signell wrote:
This is probably a lyx bug:
./autogen.sh: OK
./configure: OK
Just for all the people stuck out there with RedHat 7.0 I've installed
it yesterday on one of our spare PC's (as I like to test the stuff before
using it in production and my option is waiting
Hi!
I'm doing my bibliography manually, no use of
bibtex, cause I already had the list in ascii-form.
So I include the file to my lyx-doc and change the
env. to description, which is what I prefer for layout. BUT: Description sets
all items bold. Is there a way to having these items in
Chris Schulbert wrote:
I'm doing my bibliography manually, no use of bibtex, cause I already
had the list in ascii-form.
So I include the file to my lyx-doc and change the env. to
description, which is what I prefer for layout. BUT: Description sets
all items bold. Is there a way to having
Mate Wierdl wrote:
I do not see why people cannot use the rpm compiled on a 6.2 system.
Better than switching to texmac or whatever.
Mate
There is a libstdc++ dependency which is unsatisfied, at least on the
machine where I tried it.
When I reported the problem compiling to RedHat, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| "Paul" == Paul E Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Paul As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
| Paul compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
| Paul pointing back to the standard template
Steven Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I am on a shared Redhat 6.2 machine and I do not have root privilages to
| it (nor am I likely to get them)
|
| I tried installing xforms and lyx from RPM setting the prefix to my home
| folder and all seemed to go well until I tried to run it could
I am trying to configure Lyx 1.1.5 on Redhat
6.2. It brings up the error message that it cannot find the Xpm or
Xforms Libraries. I therefore installed the respective RPM's using
KPackage but this didn't make any difference. I have checked that
these are the versions of Xpm and Xforms
I have managed to make it happy over xforms and libxpm, however it is still
complaining about finding forms.h - I thought this was a file within xforms?
I did try installing xforms 0.89 instead of 0.88, but that didn't seem to
help.
Thanks very much
Tom.
- Original Message -
From: Paul
This is probably a lyx bug:
./autogen.sh: OK
./configure: OK
make: fails
make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/sdc3/lyx-devel/src/mathed'
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src
-I../../images -I./../ -I../.. -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include
On 11-Oct-2000 Svante Signell wrote:
> This is probably a lyx bug:
>
> ./autogen.sh: OK
> ./configure: OK
Just for all the people stuck out there with RedHat 7.0 I've installed
it yesterday on one of our spare PC's (as I like to test the stuff before
using it in production and my option is
Hi!
I'm doing my bibliography manually, no use of
bibtex, cause I already had the list in ascii-form.
So I include the file to my lyx-doc and change the
env. to description, which is what I prefer for layout. BUT: Description sets
all items bold. Is there a way to having these items in
> Chris Schulbert wrote:
> I'm doing my bibliography manually, no use of bibtex, cause I already
> had the list in ascii-form.
> So I include the file to my lyx-doc and change the env. to
> description, which is what I prefer for layout. BUT: Description sets
> all items bold. Is there a way to
Mate Wierdl wrote:
>
> I do not see why people cannot use the rpm compiled on a 6.2 system.
> Better than switching to texmac or whatever.
>
> Mate
There is a libstdc++ dependency which is unsatisfied, at least on the
machine where I tried it.
When I reported the problem compiling to RedHat,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| > "Paul" == Paul E Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Paul> As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
| Paul> compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
| Paul> pointing back to the standard
Steven Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I am on a shared Redhat 6.2 machine and I do not have root privilages to
| it (nor am I likely to get them)
|
| I tried installing xforms and lyx from RPM setting the prefix to my home
| folder and all seemed to go well until I tried to run it could
I am trying to configure Lyx 1.1.5 on Redhat
6.2. It brings up the error message that it cannot find the Xpm or
Xforms Libraries. I therefore installed the respective RPM's using
KPackage but this didn't make any difference. I have checked that
these are the versions of Xpm and Xforms
I have managed to make it happy over xforms and libxpm, however it is still
complaining about finding forms.h - I thought this was a file within xforms?
I did try installing xforms 0.89 instead of 0.88, but that didn't seem to
help.
Thanks very much
Tom.
- Original Message -
From: Paul
22 matches
Mail list logo
