Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

- Original Message - From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Stephen P. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 10:53 PM Subject: Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs Stephen == Stephen P Harris [EMAIL

Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

Stephen == Stephen P Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephen Unfortunately, I think it is more likely that you forgot it. Stephen Do as I say, not as I do. Let's forget about it, then :) The points that interest me in that discussion are: - the fact that the tetex rpms might not be of very

Cannot get docbook on a mac

Hi everyone, I am new to this forum, but have used lyx a little bit over a longish period of time. I now run on OS X tiger and installed the Tex bundle with fink (which appears to include a bunch of sgml/docbook stuff) and the Aqua version of lxy and everything seems to be working ... except

Re: Cannot get docbook on a mac

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Rolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: I am new to this forum, but have used lyx a little bit over a longish period of time. I now run on OS X tiger and installed the Tex bundle with fink (which appears to include a bunch of sgml/docbook stuff) and the Aqua version of lxy

Re: Cannot get docbook on a mac

On Sep 13, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Mike Meyer wrote: the configure script walks your $PATH looking for sgmltools and/or db2dvi to decide whether or not to configure docbook support. Fink probably put those in /sw/bin. If that's the case, you need to add /sw/bin the path used by LyX. On tiger

Re: Cannot get docbook on a mac

[Apologies to those of you who are seeing this twice.] In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: On Sep 13, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Mike Meyer wrote: the configure script walks your $PATH looking for sgmltools and/or db2dvi to decide whether or not to configure docbook support.

Command Control

I use LyX on both Unix and the Mac. The Mac version does a marvelous job of looking like a Mac application (at least to my not-very-mac-enabled-eyes), but it does so by mapping the control key bindings to the command key. This means I can't use the non-Mac bindings - especially the emacs bindings

Re: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs)

Stephen == Stephen P Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephen Unfortunately, I think it is more likely that you forgot it. Stephen Do as I say, not as I do. Let's forget about it, then :) The points that interest me in that discussion are: - the fact that the tetex rpms might not be of very

Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

Stephen P. Harris wrote: - Original Message - From: Peter Flynn Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4? I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was: 1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory; 2. yum install lyx. I just finished installing LyX

Re: OT: tetex RPMs

Stephen P. Harris wrote: - Original Message - From: Angus Leeming Stephen P. Harris wrote: Peter Flynn is an arrogant, ignorant blowhard. I think my expression of dissatisfaction was rather moderate. I think your moral intervention was a day late and a dollar short and not

Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

Peter Flynn wrote: Paul Smith wrote: 2. yum install lyx. Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX. Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the real tetex from the TeX

Re: Command Control

On Sep 13, 2005, at 5:31 PM, Mike Meyer wrote: I use LyX on both Unix and the Mac. The Mac version does a marvelous job of looking like a Mac application (at least to my not-very-mac-enabled-eyes), but it does so by mapping the control key bindings to the command key. This means I can't use the

Re: Command Control

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: On Sep 13, 2005, at 5:31 PM, Mike Meyer wrote: I use LyX on both Unix and the Mac. The Mac version does a marvelous job of looking like a Mac application (at least to my not-very-mac-enabled-eyes), but it does so by mapping the

Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

- Original Message - From: Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 6:31 PM Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs Stephen P. Harris wrote: - Original Message - From: Peter Flynn Is anyone out there using LyX on

Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

- Original Message - From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Stephen P. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 10:53 PM Subject: Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs Stephen == Stephen P Harris [EMAIL

Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

Stephen == Stephen P Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephen Unfortunately, I think it is more likely that you forgot it. Stephen Do as I say, not as I do. Let's forget about it, then :) The points that interest me in that discussion are: - the fact that the tetex rpms might not be of very

Cannot get docbook on a mac

Hi everyone, I am new to this forum, but have used lyx a little bit over a longish period of time. I now run on OS X tiger and installed the Tex bundle with fink (which appears to include a bunch of sgml/docbook stuff) and the Aqua version of lxy and everything seems to be working ... except

Re: Cannot get docbook on a mac

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Rolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: I am new to this forum, but have used lyx a little bit over a longish period of time. I now run on OS X tiger and installed the Tex bundle with fink (which appears to include a bunch of sgml/docbook stuff) and the Aqua version of lxy

Re: Cannot get docbook on a mac

On Sep 13, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Mike Meyer wrote: the configure script walks your $PATH looking for sgmltools and/or db2dvi to decide whether or not to configure docbook support. Fink probably put those in /sw/bin. If that's the case, you need to add /sw/bin the path used by LyX. On tiger

Re: Cannot get docbook on a mac

[Apologies to those of you who are seeing this twice.] In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: On Sep 13, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Mike Meyer wrote: the configure script walks your $PATH looking for sgmltools and/or db2dvi to decide whether or not to configure docbook support.

Command Control

I use LyX on both Unix and the Mac. The Mac version does a marvelous job of looking like a Mac application (at least to my not-very-mac-enabled-eyes), but it does so by mapping the control key bindings to the command key. This means I can't use the non-Mac bindings - especially the emacs bindings

Re: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs)

Stephen == Stephen P Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephen Unfortunately, I think it is more likely that you forgot it. Stephen Do as I say, not as I do. Let's forget about it, then :) The points that interest me in that discussion are: - the fact that the tetex rpms might not be of very

Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

Stephen P. Harris wrote: - Original Message - From: Peter Flynn Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4? I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was: 1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory; 2. yum install lyx. I just finished installing LyX

Re: OT: tetex RPMs

Stephen P. Harris wrote: - Original Message - From: Angus Leeming Stephen P. Harris wrote: Peter Flynn is an arrogant, ignorant blowhard. I think my expression of dissatisfaction was rather moderate. I think your moral intervention was a day late and a dollar short and not

Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

Peter Flynn wrote: Paul Smith wrote: 2. yum install lyx. Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX. Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the real tetex from the TeX

Re: Command Control

On Sep 13, 2005, at 5:31 PM, Mike Meyer wrote: I use LyX on both Unix and the Mac. The Mac version does a marvelous job of looking like a Mac application (at least to my not-very-mac-enabled-eyes), but it does so by mapping the control key bindings to the command key. This means I can't use the

Re: Command Control

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: On Sep 13, 2005, at 5:31 PM, Mike Meyer wrote: I use LyX on both Unix and the Mac. The Mac version does a marvelous job of looking like a Mac application (at least to my not-very-mac-enabled-eyes), but it does so by mapping the

Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

- Original Message - From: Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 6:31 PM Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs Stephen P. Harris wrote: - Original Message - From: Peter Flynn Is anyone out there using LyX on

Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

- Original Message - From: "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stephen P. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 10:53 PM Subject: Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs "Stephen" == Stephen P

Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

> "Stephen" == Stephen P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephen> Unfortunately, I think it is more likely that you forgot it. Stephen> Do as I say, not as I do. Let's forget about it, then :) The points that interest me in that discussion are: - the fact that the tetex rpms might not

Cannot get docbook on a mac

Hi everyone, I am new to this forum, but have used lyx a little bit over a longish period of time. I now run on OS X tiger and installed the Tex bundle with fink (which appears to include a bunch of sgml/docbook stuff) and the Aqua version of lxy and everything seems to be working ... except

Re: Cannot get docbook on a mac

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Rolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > I am new to this forum, but have used lyx a little bit over a > longish period of time. I now run on OS X tiger and installed the > Tex bundle with fink (which appears to include a bunch of > sgml/docbook stuff) and the Aqua version

Re: Cannot get docbook on a mac

On Sep 13, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Mike Meyer wrote: the configure script walks your $PATH looking for sgmltools and/or db2dvi to decide whether or not to configure docbook support. Fink probably put those in /sw/bin. If that's the case, you need to add /sw/bin the path used by LyX. On tiger

Re: Cannot get docbook on a mac

[Apologies to those of you who are seeing this twice.] In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > On Sep 13, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Mike Meyer wrote: > > the configure script walks your $PATH looking for sgmltools and/or > > db2dvi to decide whether or not to configure docbook

Command Control

I use LyX on both Unix and the Mac. The Mac version does a marvelous job of looking like a Mac application (at least to my not-very-mac-enabled-eyes), but it does so by mapping the control key bindings to the command key. This means I can't use the non-Mac bindings - especially the emacs bindings

Re: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs)

"Stephen" == Stephen P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephen> Unfortunately, I think it is more likely that you forgot it. Stephen> Do as I say, not as I do. Let's forget about it, then :) The points that interest me in that discussion are: - the fact that the tetex rpms might not be of

Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

Stephen P. Harris wrote: - Original Message - From: "Peter Flynn" Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4? I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was: 1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory; 2. yum install lyx. I just finished installing LyX

Re: OT: tetex RPMs

Stephen P. Harris wrote: - Original Message - From: "Angus Leeming" Stephen P. Harris wrote: Peter Flynn is an arrogant, ignorant blowhard. I think my expression of dissatisfaction was rather moderate. I think your moral intervention was a day late and a dollar short and not

Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

Peter Flynn wrote: Paul Smith wrote: 2. yum install lyx. Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX. Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the real tetex from the TeX

Re: Command Control

On Sep 13, 2005, at 5:31 PM, Mike Meyer wrote: I use LyX on both Unix and the Mac. The Mac version does a marvelous job of looking like a Mac application (at least to my not-very-mac-enabled-eyes), but it does so by mapping the control key bindings to the command key. This means I can't use the

Re: Command Control

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > On Sep 13, 2005, at 5:31 PM, Mike Meyer wrote: > > I use LyX on both Unix and the Mac. The Mac version does a marvelous > > job of looking like a Mac application (at least to my > > not-very-mac-enabled-eyes), but it does so by

Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs

- Original Message - From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 6:31 PM Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs Stephen P. Harris wrote: - Original Message - From: "Peter Flynn" Is anyone out there using