Is there any way to do on-the-fly spellchecking?
Not now.
Is there any plan to add
on-the-fly spellchecking later?
Being considered for 1.6.0, along with auto-completion, abbreviation etc.
Cheers,
Bo
Thanks for the tips, Bennett.
I'm still not sure if I totally understand, though. If I leave the
LyX.app/Contents/Resources/ui file in the preferences, won't this
mean that any of my settings for position of the toolbars and default
visibility would be lost next time I overwrite LyX.app
I also would like to express my support for a on-the-fly-spellchecker. It would
bring LyX in line with other similar editors, where such a feature has been
standard for many year. A feature poll in our wiki has indicated an overwhelming
support for it by many LyX users. Although the implementation
Is there any way to do on-the-fly spellchecking?
Not now.
Is there any plan to add
on-the-fly spellchecking later?
Being considered for 1.6.0, along with
auto-completion, abbreviation etc.
Cheers,
Bo
I want to have on-the-fly spellchecking,
auto-completion and abbreviation. I
Sam Lewis wrote:
I also would like to express my support for a on-the-fly-spellchecker. It would
bring LyX in line with other similar editors, where such a feature has been
standard for many year. A feature poll in our wiki has indicated an overwhelming
support for it by many LyX users. Although
On Saturday 11 August 2007 17:05:41 Richard Heck wrote:
Sam Lewis wrote:
I also would like to express my support for a on-the-fly-spellchecker. It
would bring LyX in line with other similar editors, where such a feature
has been standard for many year. A feature poll in our wiki has
Hi Mike (and others),
My spelling is so bad, that it's usually better to just get one with what
I want to write and then correct at the end.
On a side note, my spelling is not very good either, but I found that it has
improved through the use of an immediate indication. This also gives me
Which was the last version to run on Win98?
'Chops
Sam Lewis wrote:
I think one of the crucial differences, is the naturally high number of
mathematics, logisticians, etc. in the LyX user and developer community, who
have a very different approach to *writing* than one finds humanities. This
presumably has resulted in this peculiar situation
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, for what it's worth, I'm a humanist, and so is JMarc, one of the
lead developers.
Me? Was that intended as some kind of insult? ;=)
I think Juergen is you man.
JMarc
This has been on bugzilla for some time - cast your vote for implementation :)
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718
On 8/11/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, for what it's worth, I'm a humanist, and so is JMarc, one of the
Moschops schrieb:
Which was the last version to run on Win98?
There was no such version. LyX for Windows up to version 1.3.3 (using the XForms frontend) could be
run using the cygwin unix emulator. I tried once to get it running on Win ME but failed.
regards Uwe
On Saturday 11 August 2007 19:06:49 Richard Heck wrote:
Rather, I think
instant spellcheck distracts from the process of writing.
I agree with this. A spell checker highlighting in some way, anything it does
not understand, is most distracting and too easily breaks the thread of
thought. Much
Moschops wrote:
Which was the last version to run on Win98?
'Chops
It should be possible to make LyX 1.5 run on Windows 98/Me. I tried it a
few weeks ago. Everything seems to work except the math mode. When you
try to create an equation or open a document with mathematics, you get a
crash.
I agree with this. A spell checker highlighting in some way, anything it does
not understand, is most distracting and too easily breaks the thread of
thought.
Both sides have their (good) reasons to like/dislike this feature. LyX
will certainly provide an option to turn this feature on or off,
Hello,
I have linux (opensuse 10.2) and I want to know:
1) if I can install other distros of Tex like XeTeX,
Tex Live, ConTeXt, etc., instead Latex and to use this
with Lyx.
2) If I get a gain with this, like no package clash
(ConTeXt), add more easy font (XeTeX), etc.
Regards
Marcelo
On Aug 11, 2007, at 4:19 AM, Lee Yeoh wrote:
Thanks for the tips, Bennett.
I'm still not sure if I totally understand, though. If I leave the
LyX.app/Contents/Resources/ui file in the preferences, won't this
mean that any of my settings for position of the toolbars and
default visibility
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:07:08PM -0300, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
Hello,
I have linux (opensuse 10.2) and I want to know:
1) if I can install other distros of Tex like XeTeX,
Tex Live, ConTeXt, etc., instead Latex and to use this
with Lyx.
2) If I get a gain with this, like no package
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 21:15 +0100, Grahame Blackwood wrote:
On Saturday 11 August 2007 19:06:49 Richard Heck wrote:
Rather, I think
instant spellcheck distracts from the process of writing.
I agree with this. A spell checker highlighting in some way, anything it does
not understand, is
Is there any way to do on-the-fly spellchecking?
Not now.
Is there any plan to add
on-the-fly spellchecking later?
Being considered for 1.6.0, along with auto-completion, abbreviation etc.
Cheers,
Bo
Thanks for the tips, Bennett.
I'm still not sure if I totally understand, though. If I leave the
LyX.app/Contents/Resources/ui file in the preferences, won't this
mean that any of my settings for position of the toolbars and default
visibility would be lost next time I overwrite LyX.app
I also would like to express my support for a on-the-fly-spellchecker. It would
bring LyX in line with other similar editors, where such a feature has been
standard for many year. A feature poll in our wiki has indicated an overwhelming
support for it by many LyX users. Although the implementation
Is there any way to do on-the-fly spellchecking?
Not now.
Is there any plan to add
on-the-fly spellchecking later?
Being considered for 1.6.0, along with
auto-completion, abbreviation etc.
Cheers,
Bo
I want to have on-the-fly spellchecking,
auto-completion and abbreviation. I
Sam Lewis wrote:
I also would like to express my support for a on-the-fly-spellchecker. It would
bring LyX in line with other similar editors, where such a feature has been
standard for many year. A feature poll in our wiki has indicated an overwhelming
support for it by many LyX users. Although
On Saturday 11 August 2007 17:05:41 Richard Heck wrote:
Sam Lewis wrote:
I also would like to express my support for a on-the-fly-spellchecker. It
would bring LyX in line with other similar editors, where such a feature
has been standard for many year. A feature poll in our wiki has
Hi Mike (and others),
My spelling is so bad, that it's usually better to just get one with what
I want to write and then correct at the end.
On a side note, my spelling is not very good either, but I found that it has
improved through the use of an immediate indication. This also gives me
Which was the last version to run on Win98?
'Chops
Sam Lewis wrote:
I think one of the crucial differences, is the naturally high number of
mathematics, logisticians, etc. in the LyX user and developer community, who
have a very different approach to *writing* than one finds humanities. This
presumably has resulted in this peculiar situation
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, for what it's worth, I'm a humanist, and so is JMarc, one of the
lead developers.
Me? Was that intended as some kind of insult? ;=)
I think Juergen is you man.
JMarc
This has been on bugzilla for some time - cast your vote for implementation :)
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718
On 8/11/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, for what it's worth, I'm a humanist, and so is JMarc, one of the
Moschops schrieb:
Which was the last version to run on Win98?
There was no such version. LyX for Windows up to version 1.3.3 (using the XForms frontend) could be
run using the cygwin unix emulator. I tried once to get it running on Win ME but failed.
regards Uwe
On Saturday 11 August 2007 19:06:49 Richard Heck wrote:
Rather, I think
instant spellcheck distracts from the process of writing.
I agree with this. A spell checker highlighting in some way, anything it does
not understand, is most distracting and too easily breaks the thread of
thought. Much
Moschops wrote:
Which was the last version to run on Win98?
'Chops
It should be possible to make LyX 1.5 run on Windows 98/Me. I tried it a
few weeks ago. Everything seems to work except the math mode. When you
try to create an equation or open a document with mathematics, you get a
crash.
I agree with this. A spell checker highlighting in some way, anything it does
not understand, is most distracting and too easily breaks the thread of
thought.
Both sides have their (good) reasons to like/dislike this feature. LyX
will certainly provide an option to turn this feature on or off,
Hello,
I have linux (opensuse 10.2) and I want to know:
1) if I can install other distros of Tex like XeTeX,
Tex Live, ConTeXt, etc., instead Latex and to use this
with Lyx.
2) If I get a gain with this, like no package clash
(ConTeXt), add more easy font (XeTeX), etc.
Regards
Marcelo
On Aug 11, 2007, at 4:19 AM, Lee Yeoh wrote:
Thanks for the tips, Bennett.
I'm still not sure if I totally understand, though. If I leave the
LyX.app/Contents/Resources/ui file in the preferences, won't this
mean that any of my settings for position of the toolbars and
default visibility
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:07:08PM -0300, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
Hello,
I have linux (opensuse 10.2) and I want to know:
1) if I can install other distros of Tex like XeTeX,
Tex Live, ConTeXt, etc., instead Latex and to use this
with Lyx.
2) If I get a gain with this, like no package
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 21:15 +0100, Grahame Blackwood wrote:
On Saturday 11 August 2007 19:06:49 Richard Heck wrote:
Rather, I think
instant spellcheck distracts from the process of writing.
I agree with this. A spell checker highlighting in some way, anything it does
not understand, is
> Is there any way to do on-the-fly spellchecking?
Not now.
> Is there any plan to add
> on-the-fly spellchecking later?
Being considered for 1.6.0, along with auto-completion, abbreviation etc.
Cheers,
Bo
Thanks for the tips, Bennett.
I'm still not sure if I totally understand, though. If I leave the
LyX.app/Contents/Resources/ui file in the preferences, won't this
mean that any of my settings for position of the toolbars and default
visibility would be lost next time I overwrite LyX.app
I also would like to express my support for a on-the-fly-spellchecker. It would
bring LyX in line with other similar editors, where such a feature has been
standard for many year. A feature poll in our wiki has indicated an overwhelming
support for it by many LyX users. Although the implementation
> > Is there any way to do on-the-fly spellchecking?
>
> Not now.
>
> > Is there any plan to add
> > on-the-fly spellchecking later?
>
> Being considered for 1.6.0, along with
> auto-completion, abbreviation etc.
>
> Cheers,
> Bo
>
I want to have on-the-fly spellchecking,
auto-completion and
Sam Lewis wrote:
I also would like to express my support for a on-the-fly-spellchecker. It would
bring LyX in line with other similar editors, where such a feature has been
standard for many year. A feature poll in our wiki has indicated an overwhelming
support for it by many LyX users. Although
On Saturday 11 August 2007 17:05:41 Richard Heck wrote:
> Sam Lewis wrote:
> > I also would like to express my support for a on-the-fly-spellchecker. It
> > would bring LyX in line with other similar editors, where such a feature
> > has been standard for many year. A feature poll in our wiki has
Hi Mike (and others),
> My spelling is so bad, that it's usually better to just get one with what
> I want to write and then correct at the end.
On a side note, my spelling is not very good either, but I found that it has
improved through the use of an "immediate indication". This also gives me
Which was the last version to run on Win98?
'Chops
Sam Lewis wrote:
I think one of the crucial differences, is the "naturally" high number of
mathematics, logisticians, etc. in the LyX user and developer community, who
have a very different approach to *writing* than one finds humanities. This
presumably has resulted in this peculiar situation
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, for what it's worth, I'm a humanist, and so is JMarc, one of the
> lead developers.
Me? Was that intended as some kind of insult? ;=)
I think Juergen is you man.
JMarc
This has been on bugzilla for some time - cast your vote for implementation :)
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718
On 8/11/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, for what it's worth, I'm a humanist, and so is JMarc, one
Moschops schrieb:
Which was the last version to run on Win98?
There was no such version. LyX for Windows up to version 1.3.3 (using the XForms frontend) could be
run using the cygwin unix emulator. I tried once to get it running on Win ME but failed.
regards Uwe
On Saturday 11 August 2007 19:06:49 Richard Heck wrote:
> Rather, I think
> instant spellcheck distracts from the process of writing.
I agree with this. A spell checker highlighting in some way, anything it does
not understand, is most distracting and too easily breaks the thread of
thought.
Moschops wrote:
Which was the last version to run on Win98?
'Chops
It should be possible to make LyX 1.5 run on Windows 98/Me. I tried it a
few weeks ago. Everything seems to work except the math mode. When you
try to create an equation or open a document with mathematics, you get a
crash.
> I agree with this. A spell checker highlighting in some way, anything it does
> not understand, is most distracting and too easily breaks the thread of
> thought.
Both sides have their (good) reasons to like/dislike this feature. LyX
will certainly provide an option to turn this feature on or
Hello,
I have linux (opensuse 10.2) and I want to know:
1) if I can install other distros of Tex like XeTeX,
Tex Live, ConTeXt, etc., instead Latex and to use this
with Lyx.
2) If I get a gain with this, like no package clash
(ConTeXt), add more easy font (XeTeX), etc.
Regards
Marcelo
On Aug 11, 2007, at 4:19 AM, Lee Yeoh wrote:
Thanks for the tips, Bennett.
I'm still not sure if I totally understand, though. If I leave the
LyX.app/Contents/Resources/ui file in the preferences, won't this
mean that any of my settings for position of the toolbars and
default visibility
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:07:08PM -0300, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
> Hello,
> I have linux (opensuse 10.2) and I want to know:
>
> 1) if I can install other distros of Tex like XeTeX,
> Tex Live, ConTeXt, etc., instead Latex and to use this
> with Lyx.
>
> 2) If I get a gain with this, like no
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 21:15 +0100, Grahame Blackwood wrote:
> On Saturday 11 August 2007 19:06:49 Richard Heck wrote:
> > Rather, I think
> > instant spellcheck distracts from the process of writing.
>
> I agree with this. A spell checker highlighting in some way, anything it does
> not
57 matches
Mail list logo
