Re: IEEE conferences class missing in LyX 2.1?

[Jerry]

On Dec 12, 2013, at 4:59 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote:

 
 
 On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
 At the What's new in LyX 2.1 at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21 says 
 that LyX supports now not only papers for IEEE journals but also 
 contributions to IEEE conferences I'm using LyX 2.1.0 beta 2 and I don't 
 see the IEEE conferences class listed.
 
 Jerry
  
 On which platform are you ?
  
 Vincent
  
 
Sorry for the slow reply.

I'm on OS X 10.8.5, Mountain Lion. Sorry, I should have mentioned that but this 
problem didn't seem OS-specific.

Jerry

Re: IEEE conferences class missing in LyX 2.1?

[John Kane]

I see something called IEETran-Conference.lyx in the templates folder with 
LyX2.1 beta under Ubuntu 13.10. 





On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:51:07 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
 


On Dec 12, 2013, at 4:59 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote:




On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:

At the What's new in LyX 2.1 at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21 says that 
LyX supports now not only papers for IEEE journals but also contributions to 
IEEE conferences I'm using LyX 2.1.0 beta 2 and I don't see the IEEE 
conferences class listed.

Jerry
 
On which platform are you ?
 
Vincent
 

Sorry for the slow reply.

I'm on OS X 10.8.5, Mountain Lion. Sorry, I should have mentioned that but this 
problem didn't seem OS-specific.

Jerry

Re: Lyx - Reviewed at www.ilovefreesoftware.com

[Wolfgang Keller]

 I am Arun from www.ilovefreesoftware.com. We recently reviewed Lyx on
 our website here:

And it seems that you've missed the *essential* distinctive advantages
of LyX/LaTeX such as 

- structure markup (instead of finger painting)
- typographic quality of the (PDF) output

SIncerely,

Wolfgang

Re: Koma(book) question

[Dr Eberhard Lisse]

Try

de.comp.text.tex
http://komascript.de

el


On 2013-12-16, 10:58 , Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
 On Monday 16 December 2013 00:17:38 Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:

 Wolfgang,



 This is a LaTeX question, and I am sure this isn't really difficult, but

 why don't you ask Markus Kohm directly?





 el



 Thanks, Eberhard,



 since I did not get an answer to my question so far, I have asked at

 tex-...@listserv.dfn.de

 were Markus Kohm is often looking. Hope, he or somebody else finds the
 time and a solution. It is probably just a matter of finding the right
 page in Markus Kohms book.



 Wolfgang

Re: Search - highlight of all occurrences of search term on display?

[Jerry]

Sorry for the slow reply.
Jerry

On Dec 12, 2013, at 1:51 AM, Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 
 
 On 12/11/13, 24:30 , Jerry wrote:
 
 On Dec 10, 2013, at 4:04 AM, Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de
 wrote:
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
 
 Hi
 
 Sometimes it is useful to highlight all occurrences of the
 search term, e.g. when navigating to locations in the text where
 a certain term occurs. Is this possible in LyX? I couldn't find
 anything in the search dialog.
 
 I am only referring to highlighting on the screen, not the 
 compiled document.
 
 Is there something I have overlooked?
 
 Cheers,
 
 Rainer
 
 This is indeed a useful function. However, there is another
 function that achieves similar results and in some ways is better.
 
 It works like this: Once the Find function finds its first result, 
 pressing a specified key combination takes you to the next result
 no matter if the Find dialog window is open or not--there is no
 need to constantly mess with the Find dialog or remove your fingers
 from the keyboard to re-open it or to click a button.
 
 Agreed - this would be very useful and time saving.
 
 
 To find the previous occurrence of the find-string, press another
 key combination.
 
 Also agreed - forward and backward search by keyboard would be very
 useful.
 
 One way that this is superior to the highlight-all approach is that
 the screen is scrolled for you. In the highlight-all approach,
 scrolling to the next or previous find result can be difficult
 especially when the results are far apart.
 
 Both are useful - It is advantageous to see all occurrences
 highlighted to assess the context of the search term, but moving to
 the next one by keyboard shortcut would be a very useful addition to
 this - they would supplement each other. See e.g. the search in
 Firefox: one Button which says Highlight All and one to search
 backward and forward - just also via keyboard shortcuts.

Agreed--I forgot to mention that this is the way many recent OS X programs 
work. For example, here is a screen shot from Apple's TextEdit. I'm not crazy 
about darkening the background when the multiple selection is active but I 
suppose that that is the programmer's option. (I hope this list allows 
attachments--there should be a screen shot right here.) Hitting Command-G moves 
the yellow-highlighted selection to the next of.



PastedGraphic-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


 
 
 When this functionality is combined with the ability to pass
 selected text to the Find function with still another key
 combination (without the need to copy the selected text, open the
 Find dialog, paste the selected text, then click some more to
 search forward or backward), the searching process becomes
 unbelievably streamlined.
 
 Sounds great - effectively a search in the background. If pone wants
 to see a dialog, just press a different key combination.

Right. And on OS X, the Find buffer, if that is a good term, is global, 
across all applications. So you can select text in one program, hit Command-E, 
switch to another program and hit (Shift-)Command-G to find the next (previous) 
occurrence of the text. BTW these are the long-standardized keyboard shortcuts 
on OS X and are essentially universal--Microsoft and I suppose a few others 
with long-term cross-platform programs still insist on doing it their own way. 
But note that OS X users can easily modify the keyboard shortcuts of nearly all 
programs using the Keyboard System Preference. Not sure if this works on e.g. 
Word but it certainly works on Qt programs including LyX.
 
 
 This functionality has been a standardized feature in OS X
 programs from the beginning (going on 12 years) and might have been
 present in pre-OS X OS's from Apple (I can't recall for sure).
 
 Interesting - I am using Mac, but was never aware of this - what are
 the shortcuts there?

See the above remark. They are described on the Find menu on every Mac 
program. 8^)

 
 
 Some will recall that I have discussed this before, so I hate to
 be redundant, but I believe this is a very useful approach (and
 not exclusive to the highlight-all approach) and is sorely missed
 by OS X users. And it can be implemented in such a way that the
 more laborious approach is available in its current form--that's
 the way OS X does it, with sort of the long way and the power
 user way both available.
 
 +1
 
 This definitely sounds like a useful GSoC project?
 
 Rainer
 
 
 Jerry
 
 
 - -- 
 Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation
 Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)
 
 Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
 Stellenbosch University
 South Africa
 
 Tel :   +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
 Cell:   +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98
 Fax :   +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44
 
 Fax (D):+49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44
 
 email:  rai...@krugs.de
 
 Skype:  RMkrug
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 

Comment écrire en Quôc Ngu' avec LyX ?

[Robert Adolle]

Merci de m'aider.

Sous Linux, je n'arrive même pas à me servir de X-Unikey, alors que, 
hélas, j'y arrive avec cette horreur de Windows.
Normalement, on devrait pouvoir écrire en toutes les langues avec LyX, 
et le viêtnamien est une langue alphabétique.


Merci !

Re: Koma(book) question

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

On Tuesday 17 December 2013 21:01:13 Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
 Try
 
   de.comp.text.tex
   http://komascript.de
 
 el

Thanks.
Found out that \addtokomafont
und
\setkomafont
are the keys for my problem. 

What I do not know yet, is, how to set the section titles in CAPITALS

Wolfgang
 
 On 2013-12-16, 10:58 , Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
  On Monday 16 December 2013 00:17:38 Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
  Wolfgang,
  
  
  
  This is a LaTeX question, and I am sure this isn't really difficult,
  but
  
  why don't you ask Markus Kohm directly?
  
  
  
  
  
  el
  
  Thanks, Eberhard,
  
  
  
  since I did not get an answer to my question so far, I have asked at
  
  tex-...@listserv.dfn.de
  
  were Markus Kohm is often looking. Hope, he or somebody else finds the
  time and a solution. It is probably just a matter of finding the right
  page in Markus Kohms book.
  
  
  
  Wolfgang

Re: IEEE conferences class missing in LyX 2.1?

[Jerry]

On Dec 12, 2013, at 4:59 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote:

 
 
 On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
 At the What's new in LyX 2.1 at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21 says 
 that LyX supports now not only papers for IEEE journals but also 
 contributions to IEEE conferences I'm using LyX 2.1.0 beta 2 and I don't 
 see the IEEE conferences class listed.
 
 Jerry
  
 On which platform are you ?
  
 Vincent
  
 
Sorry for the slow reply.

I'm on OS X 10.8.5, Mountain Lion. Sorry, I should have mentioned that but this 
problem didn't seem OS-specific.

Jerry

Re: IEEE conferences class missing in LyX 2.1?

[John Kane]

I see something called IEETran-Conference.lyx in the templates folder with 
LyX2.1 beta under Ubuntu 13.10. 





On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:51:07 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
 


On Dec 12, 2013, at 4:59 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote:




On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:

At the What's new in LyX 2.1 at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21 says that 
LyX supports now not only papers for IEEE journals but also contributions to 
IEEE conferences I'm using LyX 2.1.0 beta 2 and I don't see the IEEE 
conferences class listed.

Jerry
 
On which platform are you ?
 
Vincent
 

Sorry for the slow reply.

I'm on OS X 10.8.5, Mountain Lion. Sorry, I should have mentioned that but this 
problem didn't seem OS-specific.

Jerry

Re: Lyx - Reviewed at www.ilovefreesoftware.com

[Wolfgang Keller]

 I am Arun from www.ilovefreesoftware.com. We recently reviewed Lyx on
 our website here:

And it seems that you've missed the *essential* distinctive advantages
of LyX/LaTeX such as 

- structure markup (instead of finger painting)
- typographic quality of the (PDF) output

SIncerely,

Wolfgang

Re: Koma(book) question

[Dr Eberhard Lisse]

Try

de.comp.text.tex
http://komascript.de

el


On 2013-12-16, 10:58 , Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
 On Monday 16 December 2013 00:17:38 Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:

 Wolfgang,



 This is a LaTeX question, and I am sure this isn't really difficult, but

 why don't you ask Markus Kohm directly?





 el



 Thanks, Eberhard,



 since I did not get an answer to my question so far, I have asked at

 tex-...@listserv.dfn.de

 were Markus Kohm is often looking. Hope, he or somebody else finds the
 time and a solution. It is probably just a matter of finding the right
 page in Markus Kohms book.



 Wolfgang

Re: Search - highlight of all occurrences of search term on display?

[Jerry]

Sorry for the slow reply.
Jerry

On Dec 12, 2013, at 1:51 AM, Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 
 
 On 12/11/13, 24:30 , Jerry wrote:
 
 On Dec 10, 2013, at 4:04 AM, Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de
 wrote:
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
 
 Hi
 
 Sometimes it is useful to highlight all occurrences of the
 search term, e.g. when navigating to locations in the text where
 a certain term occurs. Is this possible in LyX? I couldn't find
 anything in the search dialog.
 
 I am only referring to highlighting on the screen, not the 
 compiled document.
 
 Is there something I have overlooked?
 
 Cheers,
 
 Rainer
 
 This is indeed a useful function. However, there is another
 function that achieves similar results and in some ways is better.
 
 It works like this: Once the Find function finds its first result, 
 pressing a specified key combination takes you to the next result
 no matter if the Find dialog window is open or not--there is no
 need to constantly mess with the Find dialog or remove your fingers
 from the keyboard to re-open it or to click a button.
 
 Agreed - this would be very useful and time saving.
 
 
 To find the previous occurrence of the find-string, press another
 key combination.
 
 Also agreed - forward and backward search by keyboard would be very
 useful.
 
 One way that this is superior to the highlight-all approach is that
 the screen is scrolled for you. In the highlight-all approach,
 scrolling to the next or previous find result can be difficult
 especially when the results are far apart.
 
 Both are useful - It is advantageous to see all occurrences
 highlighted to assess the context of the search term, but moving to
 the next one by keyboard shortcut would be a very useful addition to
 this - they would supplement each other. See e.g. the search in
 Firefox: one Button which says Highlight All and one to search
 backward and forward - just also via keyboard shortcuts.

Agreed--I forgot to mention that this is the way many recent OS X programs 
work. For example, here is a screen shot from Apple's TextEdit. I'm not crazy 
about darkening the background when the multiple selection is active but I 
suppose that that is the programmer's option. (I hope this list allows 
attachments--there should be a screen shot right here.) Hitting Command-G moves 
the yellow-highlighted selection to the next of.



PastedGraphic-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


 
 
 When this functionality is combined with the ability to pass
 selected text to the Find function with still another key
 combination (without the need to copy the selected text, open the
 Find dialog, paste the selected text, then click some more to
 search forward or backward), the searching process becomes
 unbelievably streamlined.
 
 Sounds great - effectively a search in the background. If pone wants
 to see a dialog, just press a different key combination.

Right. And on OS X, the Find buffer, if that is a good term, is global, 
across all applications. So you can select text in one program, hit Command-E, 
switch to another program and hit (Shift-)Command-G to find the next (previous) 
occurrence of the text. BTW these are the long-standardized keyboard shortcuts 
on OS X and are essentially universal--Microsoft and I suppose a few others 
with long-term cross-platform programs still insist on doing it their own way. 
But note that OS X users can easily modify the keyboard shortcuts of nearly all 
programs using the Keyboard System Preference. Not sure if this works on e.g. 
Word but it certainly works on Qt programs including LyX.
 
 
 This functionality has been a standardized feature in OS X
 programs from the beginning (going on 12 years) and might have been
 present in pre-OS X OS's from Apple (I can't recall for sure).
 
 Interesting - I am using Mac, but was never aware of this - what are
 the shortcuts there?

See the above remark. They are described on the Find menu on every Mac 
program. 8^)

 
 
 Some will recall that I have discussed this before, so I hate to
 be redundant, but I believe this is a very useful approach (and
 not exclusive to the highlight-all approach) and is sorely missed
 by OS X users. And it can be implemented in such a way that the
 more laborious approach is available in its current form--that's
 the way OS X does it, with sort of the long way and the power
 user way both available.
 
 +1
 
 This definitely sounds like a useful GSoC project?
 
 Rainer
 
 
 Jerry
 
 
 - -- 
 Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation
 Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)
 
 Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
 Stellenbosch University
 South Africa
 
 Tel :   +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
 Cell:   +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98
 Fax :   +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44
 
 Fax (D):+49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44
 
 email:  rai...@krugs.de
 
 Skype:  RMkrug
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 

Comment écrire en Quôc Ngu' avec LyX ?

[Robert Adolle]

Merci de m'aider.

Sous Linux, je n'arrive même pas à me servir de X-Unikey, alors que, 
hélas, j'y arrive avec cette horreur de Windows.
Normalement, on devrait pouvoir écrire en toutes les langues avec LyX, 
et le viêtnamien est une langue alphabétique.


Merci !

Re: Koma(book) question

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

On Tuesday 17 December 2013 21:01:13 Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
 Try
 
   de.comp.text.tex
   http://komascript.de
 
 el

Thanks.
Found out that \addtokomafont
und
\setkomafont
are the keys for my problem. 

What I do not know yet, is, how to set the section titles in CAPITALS

Wolfgang
 
 On 2013-12-16, 10:58 , Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
  On Monday 16 December 2013 00:17:38 Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
  Wolfgang,
  
  
  
  This is a LaTeX question, and I am sure this isn't really difficult,
  but
  
  why don't you ask Markus Kohm directly?
  
  
  
  
  
  el
  
  Thanks, Eberhard,
  
  
  
  since I did not get an answer to my question so far, I have asked at
  
  tex-...@listserv.dfn.de
  
  were Markus Kohm is often looking. Hope, he or somebody else finds the
  time and a solution. It is probably just a matter of finding the right
  page in Markus Kohms book.
  
  
  
  Wolfgang

Re: IEEE conferences class missing in LyX 2.1?

[Jerry]

On Dec 12, 2013, at 4:59 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn  wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Jerry  wrote:
> At the "What's new in LyX 2.1" at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21 says 
> that "LyX supports now not only papers for IEEE journals but also 
> contributions to IEEE conferences" I'm using LyX 2.1.0 beta 2 and I don't 
> see the IEEE conferences class listed.
> 
> Jerry
>  
> On which platform are you ?
>  
> Vincent
>  
> 
Sorry for the slow reply.

I'm on OS X 10.8.5, Mountain Lion. Sorry, I should have mentioned that but this 
problem didn't seem OS-specific.

Jerry

Re: IEEE conferences class missing in LyX 2.1?

[John Kane]

I see something called IEETran-Conference.lyx in the templates folder with 
LyX2.1 beta under Ubuntu 13.10. 





On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:51:07 AM, Jerry  wrote:
 


On Dec 12, 2013, at 4:59 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn  wrote:


>
>
>On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Jerry  wrote:
>
>At the "What's new in LyX 2.1" at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21 says that 
>"LyX supports now not only papers for IEEE journals but also contributions to 
>IEEE conferences" I'm using LyX 2.1.0 beta 2 and I don't see the IEEE 
>conferences class listed.
>>
>>Jerry
> 
>On which platform are you ?
> 
>Vincent
> 
>
>Sorry for the slow reply.

I'm on OS X 10.8.5, Mountain Lion. Sorry, I should have mentioned that but this 
problem didn't seem OS-specific.

Jerry

Re: Lyx - Reviewed at www.ilovefreesoftware.com

[Wolfgang Keller]

> I am Arun from www.ilovefreesoftware.com. We recently reviewed Lyx on
> our website here:

And it seems that you've missed the *essential* distinctive advantages
of LyX/LaTeX such as 

- structure markup (instead of "finger painting")
- typographic quality of the (PDF) output

SIncerely,

Wolfgang

Re: Koma(book) question

[Dr Eberhard Lisse]

Try

de.comp.text.tex
http://komascript.de

el


On 2013-12-16, 10:58 , Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> On Monday 16 December 2013 00:17:38 Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
>
>> Wolfgang,
>
>>
>
>> This is a LaTeX question, and I am sure this isn't really difficult, but
>
>> why don't you ask Markus Kohm directly?
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> el
>
>
>
> Thanks, Eberhard,
>
>
>
> since I did not get an answer to my question so far, I have asked at
>
> tex-...@listserv.dfn.de
>
> were Markus Kohm is often looking. Hope, he or somebody else finds the
> time and a solution. It is probably just a matter of finding the right
> page in Markus Kohms book.
>
>
>
> Wolfgang

Re: Search - highlight of all occurrences of search term on display?

[Jerry]

Sorry for the slow reply.
Jerry

On Dec 12, 2013, at 1:51 AM, Rainer M Krug  wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/11/13, 24:30 , Jerry wrote:
>> 
>> On Dec 10, 2013, at 4:04 AM, Rainer M Krug 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> Sometimes it is useful to highlight all occurrences of the
>>> search term, e.g. when navigating to locations in the text where
>>> a certain term occurs. Is this possible in LyX? I couldn't find
>>> anything in the search dialog.
>>> 
>>> I am only referring to highlighting on the screen, not the 
>>> compiled document.
>>> 
>>> Is there something I have overlooked?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Rainer
>>> 
>> This is indeed a useful function. However, there is another
>> function that achieves similar results and in some ways is better.
>> 
>> It works like this: Once the Find function finds its first result, 
>> pressing a specified key combination takes you to the next result
>> no matter if the Find dialog window is open or not--there is no
>> need to constantly mess with the Find dialog or remove your fingers
>> from the keyboard to re-open it or to click a button.
> 
> Agreed - this would be very useful and time saving.
> 
>> 
>> To find the previous occurrence of the find-string, press another
>> key combination.
> 
> Also agreed - forward and backward search by keyboard would be very
> useful.
> 
>> One way that this is superior to the highlight-all approach is that
>> the screen is scrolled for you. In the highlight-all approach,
>> scrolling to the next or previous find result can be difficult
>> especially when the results are far apart.
> 
> Both are useful - It is advantageous to see all occurrences
> highlighted to assess the context of the search term, but moving to
> the next one by keyboard shortcut would be a very useful addition to
> this - they would supplement each other. See e.g. the search in
> Firefox: one Button which says "Highlight All" and one to search
> backward and forward - just also via keyboard shortcuts.

Agreed--I forgot to mention that this is the way many recent OS X programs 
work. For example, here is a screen shot from Apple's TextEdit. I'm not crazy 
about darkening the background when the multiple selection is active but I 
suppose that that is the programmer's option. (I hope this list allows 
attachments--there should be a screen shot right here.) Hitting Command-G moves 
the yellow-highlighted selection to the next "of."



PastedGraphic-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


> 
>> 
>> When this functionality is combined with the ability to pass
>> selected text to the Find function with still another key
>> combination (without the need to copy the selected text, open the
>> Find dialog, paste the selected text, then click some more to
>> search forward or backward), the searching process becomes
>> unbelievably streamlined.
> 
> Sounds great - effectively a search in the background. If pone wants
> to see a dialog, just press a different key combination.

Right. And on OS X, the "Find buffer," if that is a good term, is global, 
across all applications. So you can select text in one program, hit Command-E, 
switch to another program and hit (Shift-)Command-G to find the next (previous) 
occurrence of the text. BTW these are the long-standardized keyboard shortcuts 
on OS X and are essentially universal--Microsoft and I suppose a few others 
with long-term cross-platform programs still insist on doing it their own way. 
But note that OS X users can easily modify the keyboard shortcuts of nearly all 
programs using the Keyboard System Preference. Not sure if this works on e.g. 
Word but it certainly works on Qt programs including LyX.
> 
>> 
>> This functionality has been a standardized feature in OS X
>> programs from the beginning (going on 12 years) and might have been
>> present in pre-OS X OS's from Apple (I can't recall for sure).
> 
> Interesting - I am using Mac, but was never aware of this - what are
> the shortcuts there?

See the above remark. They are described on the "Find" menu on every Mac 
program. 8^)

> 
>> 
>> Some will recall that I have discussed this before, so I hate to
>> be redundant, but I believe this is a very useful approach (and
>> not exclusive to the highlight-all approach) and is sorely missed
>> by OS X users. And it can be implemented in such a way that the
>> more laborious approach is available in its current form--that's
>> the way OS X does it, with sort of the "long" way and the "power
>> user" way both available.
> 
> +1
> 
> This definitely sounds like a useful GSoC project?
> 
> Rainer
> 
>> 
>> Jerry
>> 
> 
> - -- 
> Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation
> Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)
> 
> Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
> Stellenbosch University
> South Africa
> 
> Tel :   +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
> Cell:   +33 - (0)6 85 

Comment écrire en Quôc Ngu' avec LyX ?

[Robert Adolle]

Merci de m'aider.

Sous Linux, je n'arrive même pas à me servir de X-Unikey, alors que, 
hélas, j'y arrive avec cette horreur de Windows.
Normalement, on devrait pouvoir écrire en toutes les langues avec LyX, 
et le viêtnamien est une langue alphabétique.


Merci !

Re: Koma(book) question

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

On Tuesday 17 December 2013 21:01:13 Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> Try
> 
>   de.comp.text.tex
>   http://komascript.de
> 
> el

Thanks.
Found out that \addtokomafont
und
\setkomafont
are the keys for my problem. 

What I do not know yet, is, how to set the section titles in CAPITALS

Wolfgang
> 
> On 2013-12-16, 10:58 , Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > On Monday 16 December 2013 00:17:38 Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> >> Wolfgang,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> This is a LaTeX question, and I am sure this isn't really difficult,
> >> but
> >> 
> >> why don't you ask Markus Kohm directly?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> el
> > 
> > Thanks, Eberhard,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > since I did not get an answer to my question so far, I have asked at
> > 
> > tex-...@listserv.dfn.de
> > 
> > were Markus Kohm is often looking. Hope, he or somebody else finds the
> > time and a solution. It is probably just a matter of finding the right
> > page in Markus Kohms book.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Wolfgang