Re: ???
Blacklisting 'lithasa' has worked for me. Gordon. On 29/03/15 10:04, Gordon Cooper wrote: I have blacklisted that sender at my ISP so should not get any more. Gordon. The list moderator is aware of the issue. It is hard to resolve though because it is not SPAM that is sent to the list. It is SPAM sent to you directly. So it is not a question of blocking the user from sending email to the list. Scott
Re: ???
I have blacklisted that sender at my ISP so should not get any more. Gordon. The list moderator is aware of the issue. It is hard to resolve though because it is not SPAM that is sent to the list. It is SPAM sent to you directly. So it is not a question of blocking the user from sending email to the list. Scott
Re: ???
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Gordon Cooper wrote: > > > On 28/03/15 22:04, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > If I send a mail to the Lyx User Group, each time I am getting immediately > afterward this: > > > Weitergeleitete Nachricht Datum: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 > 09:46:01 +0100 Von: Wolfgang Engelmann > > > m...@lithasa.ru > XX IXX. > > Упсэу. Хъыбар уэдгъэщIэжынщ. > > > > Am I the only one, and how can I avoid it? > Wolfgang > > > I have been getting them too Wolfgang, for several weeks. > Have reported it. > > Gordon. > > The list moderator is aware of the issue. It is hard to resolve though because it is not SPAM that is sent to the list. It is SPAM sent to you directly. So it is not a question of blocking the user from sending email to the list. Scott
Re: ???
On 28/03/15 22:04, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: If I send a mail to the Lyx User Group, each time I am getting immediately afterward this: Weitergeleitete Nachricht Datum: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:46:01 +0100 Von:Wolfgang Engelmann m...@lithasa.ru XX IXX. Упсэу. Хъыбар уэдгъэщIэжынщ. Am I the only one, and how can I avoid it? Wolfgang I have been getting them too Wolfgang, for several weeks. Have reported it. Gordon.
Re: Too many math alphabets used in version normal (latex)
On 2015-03-28, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-03-27, Patrick Dupre wrote: >> Hello, >> This is a latex issue (not lyx)! >> Sorry. >> The following example generated a compilation error: >> Too many math alphabets used in version normal >> It looks like that the 3 packages: >> fourier,bm,upgreek >> create conflicts! >> Any idea? > There is no need to use upgreek with fourier! Fourier has already upright > Greek characters. (See the package documentation for the macros.) > \upmu > is not available in fourier > the \mu of fourier is not upright. See the doc (http://mirrors.ctan.org/fonts/fourier-GUT/doc/latex/fourier/fourier-doc-en.pdf) how to get the upright Greek characters: Fourier-GUTenberg provides two greeks, slanted and upright, that may be used in the same document. ... The way these symbols may be obtained depends of the required option ( sloped or upright ). ... The \other prefix allow you to switch from one greek to the other. ... For instance, \[\alpha,\otheralpha,\Omega,\otherOmega\] ... There are only 16 slots for mathematical alphabets in TeX. Whether these suffice or not depends on the combination of documentclass and package(s) defining them. "bm" is known to be problematic. "Beamer" loads additional sans-serif mathematical fonts. For details, see e.g. the "isomath" documentation ftp://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/tex/macros/latex/contrib/isomath/isomath.html#conflicts . sincerely, Günter
Re: Too many math alphabets used in version normal (latex)
On 2015-03-27, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > This is a latex issue (not lyx)! > Sorry. > The following example generated a compilation error: > Too many math alphabets used in version normal > It looks like that the 3 packages: > fourier,bm,upgreek > create conflicts! > Any idea? There is no need to use upgreek with fourier! Fourier has already upright Greek characters. (See the package documentation for the macros.) Günter
Re: ???
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > If I send a mail to the Lyx User Group, each time I am getting immediately > afterward this: > > > Weitergeleitete Nachricht > Datum: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:46:01 +0100 > Von: Wolfgang Engelmann > > > m...@lithasa.ru > XX IXX. > > Упсэу. Хъыбар уэдгъэщIэжынщ. > > > > Am I the only one, and how can I avoid it? > Wolfgang Probably phishing: https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg186555.html Liviu -- Do you think you know what math is? http://www.ideasroadshow.com/issues/ian-stewart-2013-08-02 Or what it means to be intelligent? http://www.ideasroadshow.com/issues/john-duncan-2013-08-30 Think again: http://www.ideasroadshow.com/library
???
If I send a mail to the Lyx User Group, each time I am getting immediately afterward this: Weitergeleitete Nachricht Datum: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:46:01 +0100 Von:Wolfgang Engelmann m...@lithasa.ru XX IXX. Упсэу. Хъыбар уэдгъэщIэжынщ. Am I the only one, and how can I avoid it? Wolfgang
lyx latex export aux file
I try to reduce the bib file, which I created with jabref, to the cited references (the bib file contains many more). For this purpose I want to select the aux file. This file I get by exporting from lyx to normal latex. However, I get an error message saying that names of figures such as VanDerPol-DreiOszModul_SA-AV-HP-Sig_SA-Stoer_-1.0-80.0-0.216_Gois-Savi_V6.pdf might pose problems in producing the dvi file. I guess it complains about the underline sign. Do I have to rename all these figures, or can I ignore it or is there a work around? Wolfgang
