> On Jun 8, 2018, at 3:28 PM, David L. Johnson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2018 17:49:15 -0400
> Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> How do I enter (without using raw TeX)
>> \hat{x}_i?
>>
>> I seem to always end up with \hat{x_i}, which isn't the same (and
>> doesn't look correct)
>
> You have to be
On Fri, 08 Jun 2018 17:49:15 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
> How do I enter (without using raw TeX)
> \hat{x}_i?
>
> I seem to always end up with \hat{x_i}, which isn't the same (and
> doesn't look correct)
You have to be just a little careful. You can either enter the x, then
highlight it and
How do I enter (without using raw TeX)
\hat{x}_i?
I seem to always end up with \hat{x_i}, which isn't the same (and doesn't
look correct)
On 06/08/2018 01:39 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 06/08/2018 08:31 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
On 06/08/2018 01:14 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
Hi,
When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the
following issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my
math macros.
On 06/08/2018 08:31 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> On 06/08/2018 01:14 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
>> Hi,
>> When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the
>> following issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my
>> math macros. I could not think of a way to "encapsulate"
On 06/08/2018 01:14 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
Hi,
When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the
following issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my
math macros. I could not think of a way to "encapsulate" them.
Any help will be appreciated.
Best,
Reuven
