Re: Preview a single child document while maintaining counters and references

On 11/3/20 22:44, Patrick De Visschere wrote: On 11 Mar 2020, at 17:58, Daniel > wrote: On 2020-03-11 08:38, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Dienstag, den 10.03.2020, 15:17 +0100 schrieb Daniel: However, often I would like to preview only one child document (e.g. one

Re: Preview a single child document while maintaining counters and references

> On 11 Mar 2020, at 17:58, Daniel wrote: > > On 2020-03-11 08:38, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Am Dienstag, den 10.03.2020, 15:17 +0100 schrieb Daniel: >>> However, often I would like to preview only one child document (e.g. >>> one >>> chapter) while maintaining counters and references. Is

Re: Preview a single child document while maintaining counters and references

On 2020-03-11 08:38, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Dienstag, den 10.03.2020, 15:17 +0100 schrieb Daniel: However, often I would like to preview only one child document (e.g. one chapter) while maintaining counters and references. Is there a quick way to do so? You mean, without the master? No.

Re: Italic font doesn't working properly

Am Freitag, den 06.03.2020, 15:08 -0800 schrieb Stochastic Descent: > Hi all, > > I am using LyX 2.3.4.2 under Arch Linux. It seems Lyx is using > regular font instead of italic one, see picture below. > > > However, after I disable the regular font and just keep the italic > one, it displays

independent numbering lemmas using LyX

Dear all; I am new LyX user. When I import a tex file into Lyx (template of "IEEE Transactions") there is a problem. The following tex code \theoremstyle{plain} \newtheorem{lem}{\protect\remarkname} are forced into \theoremstyle{plain} \newtheorem{lem}[thm]{\protect\remarkname}. That means the

Re: Preview a single child document while maintaining counters and references

Am Dienstag, den 10.03.2020, 15:17 +0100 schrieb Daniel: > However, often I would like to preview only one child document (e.g. > one > chapter) while maintaining counters and references. Is there a quick > way > to do so? You mean, without the master? No. I don't think that's possible in LaTeX

Re: Bibliography missing publication date. [FIXED]

Am Dienstag, den 10.03.2020, 13:12 -0700 schrieb Rich Shepard: > For some reason that entry did not have a "year" field, only the > "date" > field. Many entries have both fields, but this one lacked the "year." > So I > added the year and now it shows up. date is biblatex-specific*, while year is