Re: I don't understand this

Am 13.06.23 um 01:30 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: On 6/12/23 16:08, Herbert Voss wrote: Am 12.06.23 um 21:49 schrieb Udicoudco: On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:32 PM Herbert Voss wrote: No, because unicode-math loads amsmath by default which defines \mathbb \mathbb isn't defined in amsmath,

Re: I don't understand this

On 6/12/23 16:08, Herbert Voss wrote: Am 12.06.23 um 21:49 schrieb Udicoudco: On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:32 PM Herbert Voss wrote: No, because unicode-math loads amsmath by default which defines \mathbb \mathbb isn't defined in amsmath, but in amsfonts, which should not be used with

Re: I don't understand this

Am 12.06.23 um 21:49 schrieb Udicoudco: On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:32 PM Herbert Voss wrote: No, because unicode-math loads amsmath by default which defines \mathbb \mathbb isn't defined in amsmath, but in amsfonts, which should not be used with unicode-math (and as a consequence, neither

Re: I don't understand this

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:32 PM Herbert Voss wrote: > No, because unicode-math loads amsmath by default which defines \mathbb \mathbb isn't defined in amsmath, but in amsfonts, which should not be used with unicode-math (and as a consequence, neither amssymb should be used with unicode-math). >

Re: I don't understand this

Am 12.06.23 um 18:46 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: On 6/12/23 07:59, Herbert Voss wrote: With unicode-math, "$\mathbb{0}$" should be rendered as "ퟘ" (U+1D7D8), with unicode-math it should be $\Bbbzero$ Sounds like a bug, then. No, because unicode-math loads amsmath by default which

Re: I don't understand this

On 6/12/23 07:59, Herbert Voss wrote: Am 12.06.23 um 13:47 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:28:50PM +0300, Udicoudco wrote: On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Scott Kostyshak wrote: On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: It's because the 'blackboard' font is

Re: I don't understand this

Am 12.06.23 um 13:47 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:28:50PM +0300, Udicoudco wrote: On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Scott Kostyshak wrote: On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: It's because the 'blackboard' font is quite limited (to ASCII caps, I think).

Re: I don't understand this

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:28:50PM +0300, Udicoudco wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > > On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's because the 'blackboard' font is quite limited (to ASCII caps, I > > > > think). If you type

Re: I don't understand this

El lun, 12 jun 2023 a las 13:29, Udicoudco () escribió: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > > On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's because the 'blackboard' font is quite limited (to ASCII caps, I > > > > think). If you type

Re: I don't understand this

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > > > > It's because the 'blackboard' font is quite limited (to ASCII caps, I > > > think). If you type characters not present in that font, you get weird > > > results. > > >

Re: I don't understand this

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 07:28:18AM +0200, Daniel wrote: > > On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > On 6/10/23 02:17, Daniel wrote: > > > On 2023-06-10 05:54, Tom Goldring wrote: > > > > If I put in the [\mathbb] "R" followed by _\aleph_0, the R and > > > > the aleph show up

SOLVED: How to change citation in Biblatex spbasic

Thanks, Herbert and Jürgen. Good to know it is quite easy to get the desired change in the output. Wolfgang Am 11.06.23 um 10:14 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Am Sonntag, dem 11.06.2023 um 09:02 +0200 schrieb Herbert Voss: Only for authors with the same familyname the given names are used.