Hi,
I think when my distro (Sabayon, Gentoo-based) upgraded to TL 2012,
some things broke. I have a document (scrartcl), in which I use
biblatex(-dw) for my bibliography and citations. Some time around when
the updates came, Lyx (2.0.4) stopped being able to produce pdf. Instead
I get tons of
Hi,
I have this strange problem. A document which was previously working
cannot be compiled anymore because latex complains about unbalanced
brackets or parentheses in a foot- or endnote. If I manually convert
to .tex and look at the resulting file, I find passages like this:
texttexttext.%
Am Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:57:34 -0400
schrieb Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org:
On 09/12/2012 01:48 PM, Christian Obst wrote:
Hi,
I have this strange problem. A document which was previously working
cannot be compiled anymore because latex complains about unbalanced
brackets or parentheses
Am Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:53:52 -0500
schrieb stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com:
Now, for your problem, here is a stab: If I understand you correctly,
biblatex gave you problems, whereas bibtex (after a few runs) gave you
correct output. You may want to check that your biblatex version
Am Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:16:44 -0500
schrieb stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com:
Actually, I had missed your example.zip file, sorry. I imported the
tex file into Lyx, and it compiles with no issues. I am attaching the
pdf page. Is that the output you wanted?
That you can compile it
Hi,
I think when my distro (Sabayon, Gentoo-based) upgraded to TL 2012,
some things broke. I have a document (scrartcl), in which I use
biblatex(-dw) for my bibliography and citations. Some time around when
the updates came, Lyx (2.0.4) stopped being able to produce pdf. Instead
I get tons of
Hi,
I have this strange problem. A document which was previously working
cannot be compiled anymore because latex complains about unbalanced
brackets or parentheses in a foot- or endnote. If I manually convert
to .tex and look at the resulting file, I find passages like this:
texttexttext.%
Am Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:57:34 -0400
schrieb Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org:
On 09/12/2012 01:48 PM, Christian Obst wrote:
Hi,
I have this strange problem. A document which was previously working
cannot be compiled anymore because latex complains about unbalanced
brackets or parentheses
Am Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:53:52 -0500
schrieb stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com:
Now, for your problem, here is a stab: If I understand you correctly,
biblatex gave you problems, whereas bibtex (after a few runs) gave you
correct output. You may want to check that your biblatex version
Am Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:16:44 -0500
schrieb stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com:
Actually, I had missed your example.zip file, sorry. I imported the
tex file into Lyx, and it compiles with no issues. I am attaching the
pdf page. Is that the output you wanted?
That you can compile it
Hi,
I think when my distro (Sabayon, Gentoo-based) upgraded to TL 2012,
some things broke. I have a document (scrartcl), in which I use
biblatex(-dw) for my bibliography and citations. Some time around when
the updates came, Lyx (2.0.4) stopped being able to produce pdf. Instead
I get tons of
Hi,
I have this strange problem. A document which was previously working
cannot be compiled anymore because latex complains about "unbalanced
brackets or parentheses in a foot- or endnote". If I manually convert
to .tex and look at the resulting file, I find passages like this:
texttexttext.%
Am Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:57:34 -0400
schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org>:
> On 09/12/2012 01:48 PM, Christian Obst wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have this strange problem. A document which was previously working
> > cannot be compiled anymore because latex complai
Am Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:53:52 -0500
schrieb stefano franchi :
> Now, for your problem, here is a stab: If I understand you correctly,
> biblatex gave you problems, whereas bibtex (after a few runs) gave you
> correct output. You may want to check that your biblatex
Am Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:16:44 -0500
schrieb stefano franchi :
> Actually, I had missed your example.zip file, sorry. I imported the
> tex file into Lyx, and it compiles with no issues. I am attaching the
> pdf page. Is that the output you wanted?
That you can compile
Hello fellow LyX users,
I installed EBGaramond via TexLive's tlmgr. I also have old documents
(previous installs), which use that font, and they compile fine
(correct font, looks great).
However, in the Document settings, EBGaramond is shown as "Not
installed." In new docs, I can't select it.
Yes, I did!
Am 14. März 2023 11:38:31 GMT-04:00 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck
:
>On 3/13/23 22:58, Christian Obst wrote:
>> Hello fellow LyX users,
>>
>> I installed EBGaramond via TexLive's tlmgr. I also have old documents
>> (previous installs), which use that
Hi all,
I'm using LyX 2.3.7, and TexLive 2023 (via tlmgr, not distro) on Void
Linux. My problem is that I can't use any of the Garamond fonts
installed (URW, EB). LyX has been configured via Tools -> Reconfigure,
and the PATH (to /opt/texlive/2023/bin/x86_64-linux) is set. LyX finds
all installed
wrote:
>
> Am 05.05.23 um 17:22 schrieb Christian Obst:
> > \usepackage{fontspec}
> > \setmainfont{EB Garamond}
> >
> > but that no longer works (gives me an error about not finding that
> > font). luaotfload-tool --find "EBGaramond" confirms that it is
libreoffice).
>
> You can also copy the fonts you want (otf // ttf) to HOME/.local/share/fonts/
> (or /usr/local/share/fonts); both should be in the font path of al programs.
> My LyX and fontspec (debian) have no problems using the HOME-directory.
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 0
ist/fonts/ttf ./
>
> I hope, this works.
>
>
> I don't know the reason, why pdflatex does not find the fonts, because
> latex has its own "database" for files. Maybe some font files are
> missing or you need to run mktexlsr (as root).
>
>
>
>
> Am 05.05.23
Something for the experts...
>
> I would NOT copy but only symlink so that an update (in /opt) will
> automatically pull through. Otherwise you have to remember to repeat
> the copy.
>
> el
>
> On 2023-05-06 00:29 , Christian Obst wrote:
> > I'll try that, thank you!
22 matches
Mail list logo