Re: How to use local package outside a texmf path?

On Dec 30, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: You have a space in the path to the file. Does it work if you escape the space? Or rename the file to eliminate it? Linux sometimes doesn't play well with filenames containing whitespace. Chris Menzel

Re: How to use local package outside a texmf path?

On Dec 30, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > You have a space in the path to the file. Does it work if you escape the > space? Or rename the file to eliminate it? Linux sometimes doesn't play well with filenames containing whitespace. Chris Menzel

Re: Spellchecker identifying correct words as incorrect

On Dec 8, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Pete Crite wrote: Hi, I'm running the latest LyX on Mac OS X. I've had the spellchecker work fine in the past, using aspell. I've just tried to spellcheck a new file, and strange things are happening. Quite frequently, words that are spelt correctly are

Re: Spellchecker identifying correct words as incorrect

On Dec 8, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Pete Crite wrote: Hi, I'm running the latest LyX on Mac OS X. I've had the spellchecker work fine in the past, using aspell. I've just tried to spellcheck a new file, and strange things are happening. Quite frequently, words that are spelt correctly are

Re: Spellchecker identifying correct words as incorrect

On Dec 8, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Pete Crite wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running the latest LyX on Mac OS X. I've had the spellchecker work fine > in the past, using aspell. I've just tried to spellcheck a new file, and > strange things are happening. Quite frequently, words that are spelt > correctly are

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)

On Dec 7, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote: I have installed the Beta2 in Mac OSX. It just works out of the box. Magnificent! I have also read in detail the WhatsNew page and the additions are really impressive (I love many of them: Sweave support, inline spell-check, native spell

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)

On Dec 7, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote: I have installed the Beta2 in Mac OSX. It just works out of the box. Magnificent! I have also read in detail the WhatsNew page and the additions are really impressive (I love many of them: Sweave support, inline spell-check, native spell

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)

On Dec 7, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote: > I have installed the Beta2 in Mac OSX. It just works out of the box. > Magnificent! > I have also read in detail the WhatsNew page and the additions are really > impressive (I love many of them: Sweave support, inline spell-check, native >

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On Nov 7, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: ...Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel: Greetings LyX users, The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú. Specifically

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On Nov 7, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: ...Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel: Greetings LyX users, The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú. Specifically

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On Nov 7, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: >>>>>>>>> ...Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Greetings LyX users, >>>>>>>>>> >>>&g

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On Nov 6, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 05.11.2010 um 04:46 schrieb Christopher Menzel: On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel: On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On Nov 6, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 05.11.2010 um 04:46 schrieb Christopher Menzel: On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel: On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On Nov 6, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 05.11.2010 um 04:46 schrieb Christopher Menzel: > >> On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel: >>> On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel: On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel: On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel: On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel: On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel: > On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel: >>> >>>> On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel: On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel: Greetings LyX users, The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel: On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel: Greetings LyX users, The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel: > >> On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel: >>> >>>> Greetings LyX users, >>&g

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel: Greetings LyX users, The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú. Specifically, the name seems

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel: Greetings LyX users, The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú. Specifically, the name seems

Re: Spellchecker and ú

On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel: Greetings LyX users, The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú. Specifically, the name seems

Spellchecker and ú

Greetings LyX users, The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú. Specifically, the name seems throw the checker pretty seriously off balance; it begins to stop on perfectly ordinary words that

Spellchecker and ú

Greetings LyX users, The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú. Specifically, the name seems throw the checker pretty seriously off balance; it begins to stop on perfectly ordinary words that

Spellchecker and ú

Greetings LyX users, The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú. Specifically, the name seems throw the checker pretty seriously off balance; it begins to stop on perfectly ordinary words that

Re: I guess I found a bug

On Feb 20, 2010, at 7:12 PM, Mehmet Bicak wrote: I am getting following weird errors, Latex error: Command \iint already defined Latex error: Command \iiint already defined Latex error: Command \nt already defined ...d{\iint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{2}} Your command was ignored.

Re: I guess I found a bug

On Feb 20, 2010, at 7:12 PM, Mehmet Bicak wrote: I am getting following weird errors, Latex error: Command \iint already defined Latex error: Command \iiint already defined Latex error: Command \nt already defined ...d{\iint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{2}} Your command was ignored.

Re: I guess I found a bug

On Feb 20, 2010, at 7:12 PM, Mehmet Bicak wrote: > I am getting following weird errors, > Latex error: Command \iint already defined > Latex error: Command \iiint already defined > Latex error: Command \nt already defined > > ...d{\iint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{2}} > > Your command was

Odd graphic insert bug (?)

I'm not *completely* sure that this is a bug, but... I inserted a perfectly ordinary PDF graphic called BadUG.pdf (generated by OmniGraffle) into a LyX document. The first time I tried to preview the document after doing so I got the not unfamiliar Cannot determine size of graphic LaTeX

Re: Odd graphic insert bug (?)

On Apr 26, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Christopher Menzel wrote: I inserted a perfectly ordinary PDF graphic called BadUG.pdf (generated by OmniGraffle) into a LyX document. The first time I tried to preview the document after doing so I got

SOLVED: Odd graphic insert bug (?)

On Apr 26, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Christopher Menzel wrote: I'm not *completely* sure that this is a bug, but... I inserted a perfectly ordinary PDF graphic called BadUG.pdf (generated by OmniGraffle) into a LyX document. The first time I tried to preview the document after doing so I got

Odd graphic insert bug (?)

I'm not *completely* sure that this is a bug, but... I inserted a perfectly ordinary PDF graphic called BadUG.pdf (generated by OmniGraffle) into a LyX document. The first time I tried to preview the document after doing so I got the not unfamiliar Cannot determine size of graphic LaTeX

Re: Odd graphic insert bug (?)

On Apr 26, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Christopher Menzel wrote: I inserted a perfectly ordinary PDF graphic called BadUG.pdf (generated by OmniGraffle) into a LyX document. The first time I tried to preview the document after doing so I got

SOLVED: Odd graphic insert bug (?)

On Apr 26, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Christopher Menzel wrote: I'm not *completely* sure that this is a bug, but... I inserted a perfectly ordinary PDF graphic called BadUG.pdf (generated by OmniGraffle) into a LyX document. The first time I tried to preview the document after doing so I got

Odd graphic insert bug (?)

I'm not *completely* sure that this is a bug, but... I inserted a perfectly ordinary PDF graphic called "BadUG.pdf" (generated by OmniGraffle) into a LyX document. The first time I tried to preview the document after doing so I got the not unfamiliar "Cannot determine size of graphic"

Re: Odd graphic insert bug (?)

On Apr 26, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Christopher Menzel wrote: I inserted a perfectly ordinary PDF graphic called "BadUG.pdf" (generated by OmniGraffle) into a LyX document. The first time I tried to preview the document after doin

SOLVED: Odd graphic insert bug (?)

On Apr 26, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Christopher Menzel wrote: I'm not *completely* sure that this is a bug, but... I inserted a perfectly ordinary PDF graphic called "BadUG.pdf" (generated by OmniGraffle) into a LyX document. The first time I tried to preview the document after doin

Re: How to enter (logic) proofs?

On Feb 18, 2009, at 10:35 AM, stefano franchi wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: Stefano Franchi wrote: Hi all, I am tryiing to enter some very simple logic proofs in my lecture notes: propositional logic constant, symbols, etc. It was

Re: How to enter (logic) proofs?

On Feb 18, 2009, at 10:35 AM, stefano franchi wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: Stefano Franchi wrote: Hi all, I am tryiing to enter some very simple logic proofs in my lecture notes: propositional logic constant, symbols, etc. It was

Re: How to enter (logic) proofs?

On Feb 18, 2009, at 10:35 AM, stefano franchi wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Richard Heck wrote: Stefano Franchi wrote: Hi all, I am tryiing to enter some very simple logic proofs in my lecture notes: propositional logic constant, symbols, etc. It was

Re: How to edit

On Feb 5, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote: On Thursday 05 February 2009 04:01:47 Niklas Huldén wrote: Joachim K. Rennstich wrote: Thanks, Ian, for the fast reply Configuration files should handled with a text editor. I don't know what that would be for your system but something like

Re: How to edit

On Feb 5, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote: On Thursday 05 February 2009 04:01:47 Niklas Huldén wrote: Joachim K. Rennstich wrote: Thanks, Ian, for the fast reply Configuration files should handled with a text editor. I don't know what that would be for your system but something like

Re: How to edit

On Feb 5, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote: On Thursday 05 February 2009 04:01:47 Niklas Huldén wrote: Joachim K. Rennstich wrote: Thanks, Ian, for the fast reply Configuration files should handled with a text editor. I don't know what that would be for your system but something like

Re: Install LyX separately

On Jan 10, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Martin Görg wrote: ... on my pursuit of happiness (install LyX) I bumped into something most inconvenient. When I try to install LyX using aptitude, apt- get, a .deb package, or the Synaptic Package Manager - just to name a few - the whatever manager does not

Re: Install LyX separately

On Jan 10, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Martin Görg wrote: ... on my pursuit of happiness (install LyX) I bumped into something most inconvenient. When I try to install LyX using aptitude, apt- get, a .deb package, or the Synaptic Package Manager - just to name a few - the whatever manager does not

Re: Install LyX separately

On Jan 10, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Martin Görg wrote: ... on my pursuit of happiness (install LyX) I bumped into something most inconvenient. When I try to install LyX using aptitude, apt- get, a .deb package, or the Synaptic Package Manager - just to name a few - the whatever manager does not

Re: Lyx functions for view pdflatex and update pdf-latex?

On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Stefano Franchi wrote: Hi all, whle trying to fix some problem with my customized bindings, I ended up losing all of them and I now need to rewrite them from scratch. Not a big deal, except that I cannot find the functions corresponding to the menu commands

Re: Lyx functions for view pdflatex and update pdf-latex?

On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Stefano Franchi wrote: Hi all, whle trying to fix some problem with my customized bindings, I ended up losing all of them and I now need to rewrite them from scratch. Not a big deal, except that I cannot find the functions corresponding to the menu commands

Re: Lyx functions for view pdflatex and update pdf-latex?

On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Stefano Franchi wrote: Hi all, whle trying to fix some problem with my customized bindings, I ended up losing all of them and I now need to rewrite them from scratch. Not a big deal, except that I cannot find the functions corresponding to the menu commands

Don't reply to digests, please

Gentle point netiquette here: If you read list mail in digest form, don't reply to it directly, as subjects like: lyx-users Digest 18 Dec 2008 08:59:48 - Issue 2717 are completely uninformative to the list members and readers of the list archives. Instead, please compose your

Don't reply to digests, please

Gentle point netiquette here: If you read list mail in digest form, don't reply to it directly, as subjects like: lyx-users Digest 18 Dec 2008 08:59:48 - Issue 2717 are completely uninformative to the list members and readers of the list archives. Instead, please compose your

Don't reply to digests, please

Gentle point netiquette here: If you read list mail in digest form, don't reply to it directly, as subjects like: lyx-users Digest 18 Dec 2008 08:59:48 - Issue 2717 are completely uninformative to the list members and readers of the list archives. Instead, please compose your

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Nick Bell wrote: Christopher Menzel wrote: On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote: Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 === Thank to all developpers for the new version

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Nick Bell wrote: Christopher Menzel wrote: On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote: Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 === Thank to all developpers for the new version

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Nick Bell wrote: Christopher Menzel wrote: On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote: Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 === Thank to all developpers for the new version

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote: Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 === Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx! Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote: Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 === Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx! Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote: Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller Public release of LyX version 1.6.1 === Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx! Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can

Re: Override menu hotkeys?

On Dec 12, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Christopher Menzel wrote: I'm using LyX 1.6 in a Linux virtual machine under OS X which uses the option key as the alt key. (I also use the OS X version, of course.) I would like to have as many Emacs keybindings as possible in LyX

Re: Override menu hotkeys?

On Dec 12, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Christopher Menzel wrote: I'm using LyX 1.6 in a Linux virtual machine under OS X which uses the option key as the alt key. (I also use the OS X version, of course.) I would like to have as many Emacs keybindings as possible in LyX

Re: Override menu hotkeys?

On Dec 12, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Christopher Menzel wrote: I'm using LyX 1.6 in a Linux virtual machine under OS X which uses the option key as the alt key. (I also use the OS X version, of course.) I would like to have as many Emacs keybindings as possible in LyX

Override menu hotkeys?

Greetings LyX users, I'm using LyX 1.6 in a Linux virtual machine under OS X which uses the option key as the alt key. (I also use the OS X version, of course.) I would like to have as many Emacs keybindings as possible in LyX, in particular, Alt-f to move forward by word, Alt-d to

Override menu hotkeys?

Greetings LyX users, I'm using LyX 1.6 in a Linux virtual machine under OS X which uses the option key as the alt key. (I also use the OS X version, of course.) I would like to have as many Emacs keybindings as possible in LyX, in particular, Alt-f to move forward by word, Alt-d to

Override menu hotkeys?

Greetings LyX users, I'm using LyX 1.6 in a Linux virtual machine under OS X which uses the option key as the alt key. (I also use the OS X version, of course.) I would like to have as many Emacs keybindings as possible in LyX, in particular, Alt-f to move forward by word, Alt-d to

Re: aspell on ubuntu with LyX

On Jan 30, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hey guys, I am running into difficulty getting aspell working under Xubuntu. I installed it but the spellcheck button is always grayed out...is there some sort of setting I can turn on to get it working? I couldn't

Re: aspell on ubuntu with LyX

On Jan 30, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hey guys, I am running into difficulty getting aspell working under Xubuntu. I installed it but the spellcheck button is always grayed out...is there some sort of setting I can turn on to get it working? I couldn't

Re: aspell on ubuntu with LyX

On Jan 30, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hey guys, I am running into difficulty getting aspell working under Xubuntu. I installed it but the spellcheck button is always grayed out...is there some sort of setting I can turn on to get it working? I couldn't

Re: Incoming 1.5.3 binaries for debian/ubuntu distributions

On Jan 17, 2008, at 5:41 AM, Sam Lewis wrote: ftp Available LyX 1.5.3 checkinstall packages for *etch* and *dapper* on ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming/ lyx_1.5.3-1_i386_dapper.deb lyx_1.5.3-1_i386_etch.deb Are we to assume negation as failure here or are there already packages available

Re: Incoming 1.5.3 binaries for debian/ubuntu distributions

On Jan 17, 2008, at 5:41 AM, Sam Lewis wrote: ftp Available LyX 1.5.3 checkinstall packages for *etch* and *dapper* on ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming/ lyx_1.5.3-1_i386_dapper.deb lyx_1.5.3-1_i386_etch.deb Are we to assume negation as failure here or are there already packages available

Re: Incoming 1.5.3 binaries for debian/ubuntu distributions

On Jan 17, 2008, at 5:41 AM, Sam Lewis wrote: ftp Available LyX 1.5.3 checkinstall packages for *etch* and *dapper* on ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming/ lyx_1.5.3-1_i386_dapper.deb lyx_1.5.3-1_i386_etch.deb Are we to assume negation as failure here or are there already packages available

Re: Spell check on the fly?

On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:02 AM, Manveru wrote: For most writers such feature is more a bug that a helpful feature. Those annoying red underlines may break your way of thinking during writing, the same is about autocorrection. Agreed about on-the-fly spellchecking, but autocorrection seems to me

Re: Spell check on the fly?

On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:02 AM, Manveru wrote: For most writers such feature is more a bug that a helpful feature. Those annoying red underlines may break your way of thinking during writing, the same is about autocorrection. Agreed about on-the-fly spellchecking, but autocorrection seems to me

Re: Spell check on the fly?

On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:02 AM, Manveru wrote: For most writers such feature is more a bug that a helpful feature. Those annoying red underlines may break your way of thinking during writing, the same is about autocorrection. Agreed about on-the-fly spellchecking, but autocorrection seems to me

Re: lyx2lyx failure

On Dec 8, 2007, at 4:06 AM, José Matos wrote: On Friday 07 December 2007 19:47:25 Christopher Menzel wrote: Howdy, I am unable to import some older LyX files (from 2000 -- LyX format version 215) A fix to this problem was committed to the next version (1.5.3). Excellent. Meanwhile

Re: lyx2lyx failure

On Dec 8, 2007, at 4:06 AM, José Matos wrote: On Friday 07 December 2007 19:47:25 Christopher Menzel wrote: Howdy, I am unable to import some older LyX files (from 2000 -- LyX format version 215) A fix to this problem was committed to the next version (1.5.3). Excellent. Meanwhile

Re: lyx2lyx failure

On Dec 8, 2007, at 4:06 AM, José Matos wrote: On Friday 07 December 2007 19:47:25 Christopher Menzel wrote: Howdy, I am unable to import some older LyX files (from 2000 -- LyX format version 215) A fix to this problem was committed to the next version (1.5.3). Excellent. Meanwhile

lyx2lyx failure

Howdy, I am unable to import some older LyX files (from 2000 -- LyX format version 215) and I'm not finding any solutions on the web or the LyX archives or Wiki. Inside LyX, I get the following msg: (MyFile) is from a different version of LyX, but the lyx2lyx script failed to convert

lyx2lyx failure

Howdy, I am unable to import some older LyX files (from 2000 -- LyX format version 215) and I'm not finding any solutions on the web or the LyX archives or Wiki. Inside LyX, I get the following msg: (MyFile) is from a different version of LyX, but the lyx2lyx script failed to convert

lyx2lyx failure

Howdy, I am unable to import some older LyX files (from 2000 -- LyX format version 215) and I'm not finding any solutions on the web or the LyX archives or Wiki. Inside LyX, I get the following msg: (MyFile) is from a different version of LyX, but the lyx2lyx script failed to convert

Re: Troubles installing a new class in 1.5.2/Linux(Ubuntu-Gutsy)

I am trying to install a new class on Lyx 1.5.2 run against the latest TeX distribution provided by Kubunt 7.10 (Gutsy). I am following the instruction provided in the LyX manual: copy the .cls file (it's a single file, not a package) to $TEXMF/tex/ latex texhash LyXToolsReconfigure quit

Re: Troubles installing a new class in 1.5.2/Linux(Ubuntu-Gutsy)

I am trying to install a new class on Lyx 1.5.2 run against the latest TeX distribution provided by Kubunt 7.10 (Gutsy). I am following the instruction provided in the LyX manual: copy the .cls file (it's a single file, not a package) to $TEXMF/tex/ latex texhash LyXToolsReconfigure quit

Re: Troubles installing a new class in 1.5.2/Linux(Ubuntu-Gutsy)

I am trying to install a new class on Lyx 1.5.2 run against the latest TeX distribution provided by Kubunt 7.10 (Gutsy). I am following the instruction provided in the LyX manual: copy the .cls file (it's a single file, not a package) to $TEXMF/tex/ latex texhash LyX>Tools>Reconfigure quit

Compile failure

I'm trying to compile from the latest sources. I've done this successfully several times in the past and I am (I think) following the instructions in INSTALL.MacOSX correctly. I have compiled and installed the latest QT/Mac (4.3.2). I've set the appropriate env vars etc and believe I

Re: Compile failure

Nonetheless I'm getting the following error (well into the compile): ld: library not found for -lQtCore this is not compile error, but linking problem. i guess you need to set path to qt4 in configure (if this is used on mac). Yes, a good suggesetion, but the curious thing is that I am

Re: Compile failure

On Nov 4, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Yes, a good suggesetion, but the curious thing is that I am setting it. whats the exact configure command you use ? For compiling Qt: ./configure -static -no-exceptions -nomake examples -nomake tools - nomake demos -prefix

Compile failure

I'm trying to compile from the latest sources. I've done this successfully several times in the past and I am (I think) following the instructions in INSTALL.MacOSX correctly. I have compiled and installed the latest QT/Mac (4.3.2). I've set the appropriate env vars etc and believe I

Re: Compile failure

Nonetheless I'm getting the following error (well into the compile): ld: library not found for -lQtCore this is not compile error, but linking problem. i guess you need to set path to qt4 in configure (if this is used on mac). Yes, a good suggesetion, but the curious thing is that I am

Re: Compile failure

On Nov 4, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Yes, a good suggesetion, but the curious thing is that I am setting it. whats the exact configure command you use ? For compiling Qt: ./configure -static -no-exceptions -nomake examples -nomake tools - nomake demos -prefix

Compile failure

I'm trying to compile from the latest sources. I've done this successfully several times in the past and I am (I think) following the instructions in INSTALL.MacOSX correctly. I have compiled and installed the latest QT/Mac (4.3.2). I've set the appropriate env vars etc and believe I

Re: Compile failure

Nonetheless I'm getting the following error (well into the compile): ld: library not found for -lQtCore this is not compile error, but linking problem. i guess you need to set path to qt4 in configure (if this is used on mac). Yes, a good suggesetion, but the curious thing is that I am

Re: Compile failure

On Nov 4, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Yes, a good suggesetion, but the curious thing is that I am setting it. whats the exact configure command you use ? For compiling Qt: ./configure -static -no-exceptions -nomake examples -nomake tools - nomake demos -prefix

Re: can´t send mail to the list

There comes a time when one must admit that life's too short to continue with an email host not responsive to problems, even if the hosting is free. We should thank our host for his previous support, and then switch email hosts -- free if possible, paid otherwise. If 100 of us contribute a

Re: can´t send mail to the list

There comes a time when one must admit that life's too short to continue with an email host not responsive to problems, even if the hosting is free. We should thank our host for his previous support, and then switch email hosts -- free if possible, paid otherwise. If 100 of us contribute a

Re: can´t send mail to the list

There comes a time when one must admit that life's too short to continue with an email host not responsive to problems, even if the hosting is free. We should thank our host for his previous support, and then switch email hosts -- free if possible, paid otherwise. If 100 of us contribute a

Re: Leopard compatibility

Has anyone tried running LyX (any version) under Mac OS 10.5? Yep (1.5.2). Any issues? None for me. Chris Menzel

Re: Leopard compatibility

Has anyone tried running LyX (any version) under Mac OS 10.5? Yep (1.5.2). Any issues? None for me. Chris Menzel

Re: Leopard compatibility

Has anyone tried running LyX (any version) under Mac OS 10.5? Yep (1.5.2). Any issues? None for me. Chris Menzel

Re: LyX is wonderful -- thank you!

On May 17, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi all, LyX is truly wonderful. While slamming out content it's as fast as any wordprocessor I've used (WP51, MS Word, OO, Vim ... Vim, a word processor?? Better don yer flame-retardant suit in case this post gets out into the wild! :-)

Re: LyX is wonderful -- thank you!

On May 17, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi all, LyX is truly wonderful. While slamming out content it's as fast as any wordprocessor I've used (WP51, MS Word, OO, Vim ... Vim, a word processor?? Better don yer flame-retardant suit in case this post gets out into the wild! :-)

<    1   2   3   4   >