Re: Poor quality in ps and pdf

It's hard to guess from your message what exactly is wrong with your output, but it likely involves the fonts selected by default. You can set up dvips to use Type 1 versions of the CM fonts in your teTeX distribution. Also, IMHO, substituting standard PS fonts like Times or Garamond further

Re: Poor quality in ps and pdf

It's hard to guess from your message what exactly is wrong with your output, but it likely involves the fonts selected by default. You can set up dvips to use Type 1 versions of the CM fonts in your teTeX distribution. Also, IMHO, substituting standard PS fonts like Times or Garamond further

Re: Poor quality in ps and pdf

It's hard to guess from your message what exactly is wrong with your output, but it likely involves the fonts selected by default. You can set up dvips to use Type 1 versions of the CM fonts in your teTeX distribution. Also, IMHO, substituting standard PS fonts like Times or Garamond further

Update Postscript via keyboard

Is there is a simple key binding in emacs (or any other mode) that will invoke Update Postscript? Thanks, -Jim -- Research Centre for English and Applied Linguistics University of Cambridgetel: +44 1223 332334 Keynes House, Trumpington St fax: +44 1223 330253 Cambridge, CB2 1QA, UK

Update Postscript via keyboard

Is there is a simple key binding in emacs (or any other mode) that will invoke Update Postscript? Thanks, -Jim -- Research Centre for English and Applied Linguistics University of Cambridgetel: +44 1223 332334 Keynes House, Trumpington St fax: +44 1223 330253 Cambridge, CB2 1QA, UK

Update Postscript via keyboard

Is there is a simple key binding in emacs (or any other mode) that will invoke Update Postscript? Thanks, -Jim -- Research Centre for English and Applied Linguistics University of Cambridgetel: +44 1223 332334 Keynes House, Trumpington St fax: +44 1223 330253 Cambridge, CB2 1QA, UK

lyx2rtf?

Unfortunately, many publishers in linguistics have standardised on MSWord or RTF as interchange formats. I have had only mixed success with the existing tex2rtf filters. However, the LyX display gives a pretty good approximation of the desired output. I wonder whether it would be feasible to do

lyx2rtf?

Unfortunately, many publishers in linguistics have standardised on MSWord or RTF as interchange formats. I have had only mixed success with the existing tex2rtf filters. However, the LyX display gives a pretty good approximation of the desired output. I wonder whether it would be feasible to do

lyx2rtf?

Unfortunately, many publishers in linguistics have standardised on MSWord or RTF as interchange formats. I have had only mixed success with the existing tex2rtf filters. However, the LyX display gives a pretty good approximation of the desired output. I wonder whether it would be feasible to do

Installing 1.1.5fix1-1 under SuSE 6.4

I currently have 1.1.5-10a installed, along with teTeX, in the standard locations. However, when I try to install 1.1.5fix1-1, I get the dependency errors: missing tetex-latex and tetex-xdvi. Is there any simple way to edit the .rpm file or feed rpm the correct file locations? Thanks, -Jim

Installing 1.1.5fix1-1 under SuSE 6.4

I currently have 1.1.5-10a installed, along with teTeX, in the standard locations. However, when I try to install 1.1.5fix1-1, I get the dependency errors: missing tetex-latex and tetex-xdvi. Is there any simple way to edit the .rpm file or feed rpm the correct file locations? Thanks, -Jim

Installing 1.1.5fix1-1 under SuSE 6.4

I currently have 1.1.5-10a installed, along with teTeX, in the standard locations. However, when I try to install 1.1.5fix1-1, I get the dependency errors: missing tetex-latex and tetex-xdvi. Is there any simple way to edit the .rpm file or feed rpm the correct file locations? Thanks, -Jim