Re: The tortured release of 2.3.0 Windows binaries

2018-05-15 Thread Walter van Holst

On 2018-05-14 19:22, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:

refused, and has refused again in the last couple days. His view is 
that

this kind of warning will confuse some users and that those same users
are at risk of having broken installations if we do not do the upgrade
for them. So his view is that we should do the upgrade silently. I find


Silent updates of software that is not maintained/released by the LyX 
team would be a betrayal of user trust. I think you made the right call.


Regards,

 Walter


Re: Google Analytics (or other)

2017-06-20 Thread Walter van Holst

On 2017-06-20 12:54, Trevor Jenkins wrote:

Link to Google Analytics and this user will delete all traces of LyX
from their systems never to re-install.


Same here. Massive violation of user trust. Just put up a Piwik install 
on a VPS someplace and you can achieve the same.


Besides, you'll be in violation of EU legislation.

Regards,

 Walter


Re: Koma-script letter error

2016-05-29 Thread Walter van Holst
On 29/05/2016 15:25, Michael Berger wrote:

> Ron, the information you provide is too general; that Latex Error may
> also be generated in hundreds of other cases.
> Please, be more specific.

The name is Walter. Anyway, as a user this is the error that gets
presented to you. If that is not specific enough, it might be worthwhile
to have more specific error message.

Either way, it was a PEBCAK, I had been using the Adress field twice and
omitted to use "end of letter" (which I do not remember being part of
KOMA-Script Letter v2 earlier).

Regards,

 Walter



Koma-script letter error

2016-05-29 Thread Walter van Holst
Hi all,

When trying to use the Koma-script Letter template I get this error:\

! LaTeX Error: \begin{letter} on input line 27 ended by \end{document}.

 \end{document}

Your command was ignored.
Type  Ito replace it with another command,
orto continue without it.

Suggestions on how to deal with this would be most welcome.

Regards,

 Walter


Re: why people give up on open source software

2013-10-24 Thread Walter van Holst
On 24/10/2013 07:32, Richard Talley wrote:
 I've read good things about Scrivener. It's more a 'book project
 management' program than a word processor. I know some people use it for
 everything until it's time to print, then they export to LaTeX. Good
 luck with it.

A somewhat close analog to Scrivener is CeltX. I prefer Scrivener over
CeltX, but if FOSS is a principle, I'd recommend looking into CeltX.

Regards,

 Walter



Re: why people give up on open source software

2013-10-24 Thread Walter van Holst
On 24/10/2013 07:32, Richard Talley wrote:
 I've read good things about Scrivener. It's more a 'book project
 management' program than a word processor. I know some people use it for
 everything until it's time to print, then they export to LaTeX. Good
 luck with it.

A somewhat close analog to Scrivener is CeltX. I prefer Scrivener over
CeltX, but if FOSS is a principle, I'd recommend looking into CeltX.

Regards,

 Walter



Re: why people give up on open source software

2013-10-24 Thread Walter van Holst
On 24/10/2013 07:32, Richard Talley wrote:
> I've read good things about Scrivener. It's more a 'book project
> management' program than a word processor. I know some people use it for
> everything until it's time to print, then they export to LaTeX. Good
> luck with it.

A somewhat close analog to Scrivener is CeltX. I prefer Scrivener over
CeltX, but if FOSS is a principle, I'd recommend looking into CeltX.

Regards,

 Walter



Re: Disable copy and paste

2013-08-08 Thread Walter van Holst
On 8 aug. 2013, at 10:17, Rilke Rainer Michael ri...@wiso.uni-koeln.de wrote:

 Hi List,
  
 I want to export a lyx document to a pdf. However, I want also that once 
 reading the document it is impossible to copy and paste text from this pdf. 
 Do you have any idea, whether there is a workaround for lyx?
  

Basically you want DRM. Which is silly at best.

Re: Disable copy and paste

2013-08-08 Thread Walter van Holst
On 8 aug. 2013, at 10:17, Rilke Rainer Michael ri...@wiso.uni-koeln.de wrote:

 Hi List,
  
 I want to export a lyx document to a pdf. However, I want also that once 
 reading the document it is impossible to copy and paste text from this pdf. 
 Do you have any idea, whether there is a workaround for lyx?
  

Basically you want DRM. Which is silly at best.

Re: Disable copy and paste

2013-08-08 Thread Walter van Holst
On 8 aug. 2013, at 10:17, Rilke Rainer Michael  wrote:

> Hi List,
>  
> I want to export a lyx document to a pdf. However, I want also that once 
> reading the document it is impossible to copy and paste text from this pdf. 
> Do you have any idea, whether there is a workaround for lyx?
>  

Basically you want DRM. Which is silly at best.

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

2013-04-05 Thread Walter van Holst

On 2013-04-05 16:49, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:


As I said this is my personal opinion so I migth be wrong, but I
haven´t received any useful opinion (besides M$ patent) of why not
doing such a thing just a few user complaining they will affect some
how what they feel is comfortable. Regarding the patent believe me
that if they patent 0s and 1s then we are definitively lost.:)


Several people have responded that ribbon  menus have limited use to 
them, to say the least. I don't think that is a useless opinion.


As someone who spends most of his working hours in Microsoft's ribbon 
menus, allow me to add to the chorus that ribbon menus tend to be 
spiteful and useless. And no, they don't really grow on you. I have no 
idea what flavour of LSD Microsoft's usability experts have been 
consuming, but I hope it is widely available so that if I ever contract 
a terminal disease I'd like to spend my final hours tripping on that 
stuff.


I'd much rather have people spend time on a concurrent user web 
front-end. Or a curses front-end to LyX. Either of these two are more 
likely to serve users well than the bloody ribbon menus.


Regards,

 Walter




Re: feature request: ribbon menus

2013-04-05 Thread Walter van Holst

On 2013-04-05 16:49, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:


As I said this is my personal opinion so I migth be wrong, but I
haven´t received any useful opinion (besides M$ patent) of why not
doing such a thing just a few user complaining they will affect some
how what they feel is comfortable. Regarding the patent believe me
that if they patent 0s and 1s then we are definitively lost.:)


Several people have responded that ribbon  menus have limited use to 
them, to say the least. I don't think that is a useless opinion.


As someone who spends most of his working hours in Microsoft's ribbon 
menus, allow me to add to the chorus that ribbon menus tend to be 
spiteful and useless. And no, they don't really grow on you. I have no 
idea what flavour of LSD Microsoft's usability experts have been 
consuming, but I hope it is widely available so that if I ever contract 
a terminal disease I'd like to spend my final hours tripping on that 
stuff.


I'd much rather have people spend time on a concurrent user web 
front-end. Or a curses front-end to LyX. Either of these two are more 
likely to serve users well than the bloody ribbon menus.


Regards,

 Walter




Re: feature request: ribbon menus

2013-04-05 Thread Walter van Holst

On 2013-04-05 16:49, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:


As I said this is my personal opinion so I migth be wrong, but I
haven´t received any useful opinion (besides M$ patent) of why not
doing such a thing just a few user complaining they will affect some
how what they feel is comfortable. Regarding the patent believe me
that if they patent 0s and 1s then we are definitively lost.:)


Several people have responded that ribbon  menus have limited use to 
them, to say the least. I don't think that is a useless opinion.


As someone who spends most of his working hours in Microsoft's ribbon 
menus, allow me to add to the chorus that ribbon menus tend to be 
spiteful and useless. And no, they don't really grow on you. I have no 
idea what flavour of LSD Microsoft's usability experts have been 
consuming, but I hope it is widely available so that if I ever contract 
a terminal disease I'd like to spend my final hours tripping on that 
stuff.


I'd much rather have people spend time on a concurrent user web 
front-end. Or a curses front-end to LyX. Either of these two are more 
likely to serve users well than the bloody ribbon menus.


Regards,

 Walter




Re: Lion

2011-07-21 Thread Walter van Holst

On 7/20/11 6:24 PM, Anders Host-Madsen wrote:

Has anyone tried LyX (2.0) under Mac OSX Lion? Has anyone encountered
any problems? I will wait with upgrading until I know LyX can
run under Lion.


Lyx 2.0.0 beta 2 runs fine on Lion.

However, lots of other applications behave wonky on Lion, so I would not 
necessarily recommend upgrading now.


Regards,

 Walter


Re: Lion

2011-07-21 Thread Walter van Holst

On 7/20/11 6:24 PM, Anders Host-Madsen wrote:

Has anyone tried LyX (2.0) under Mac OSX Lion? Has anyone encountered
any problems? I will wait with upgrading until I know LyX can
run under Lion.


Lyx 2.0.0 beta 2 runs fine on Lion.

However, lots of other applications behave wonky on Lion, so I would not 
necessarily recommend upgrading now.


Regards,

 Walter


Re: Lion

2011-07-21 Thread Walter van Holst

On 7/20/11 6:24 PM, Anders Host-Madsen wrote:

Has anyone tried LyX (2.0) under Mac OSX Lion? Has anyone encountered
any problems? I will wait with upgrading until I know LyX can
run under Lion.


Lyx 2.0.0 beta 2 runs fine on Lion.

However, lots of other applications behave wonky on Lion, so I would not 
necessarily recommend upgrading now.


Regards,

 Walter


Re: A basic requested feature

2011-04-14 Thread Walter van Holst
On Thu, April 14, 2011 10:43, Stephan Witt wrote:
 Nowadays modern desktop systems are providing the capability to search
 your files, e. g. by content.
 Normally it is supported by indexing services, so it should give you
 quick answer to
 arbitrary questions. Proposing a filename is not such an importing
 feature, IMHO.
 And it is not easy to get it right. I' always expect different points
 of view, how this should work.

It definitely is not easy to get 100% right, 80% would be interesting
enough. I disagree on the desktop search bit, that is mostly helpful
if you know a lot about the document you are looking for.

I would find a name-suggester that would take:

The current date, e.g. 20110414, an abbreviation of the style you are
using, for example 'LTR' for letters and the subject of the document
plus a version number

useful.

The most work is probably expanding the various document styles to
include a field that refers to another field that is the most suitable
source for the subject and an abbreviation scheme.

And this assumes of course that people rarely use their own document
styles.

Regards,

 Walter



Re: A basic requested feature

2011-04-14 Thread Walter van Holst
On Thu, April 14, 2011 10:43, Stephan Witt wrote:
 Nowadays modern desktop systems are providing the capability to search
 your files, e. g. by content.
 Normally it is supported by indexing services, so it should give you
 quick answer to
 arbitrary questions. Proposing a filename is not such an importing
 feature, IMHO.
 And it is not easy to get it right. I' always expect different points
 of view, how this should work.

It definitely is not easy to get 100% right, 80% would be interesting
enough. I disagree on the desktop search bit, that is mostly helpful
if you know a lot about the document you are looking for.

I would find a name-suggester that would take:

The current date, e.g. 20110414, an abbreviation of the style you are
using, for example 'LTR' for letters and the subject of the document
plus a version number

useful.

The most work is probably expanding the various document styles to
include a field that refers to another field that is the most suitable
source for the subject and an abbreviation scheme.

And this assumes of course that people rarely use their own document
styles.

Regards,

 Walter



Re: A basic requested feature

2011-04-14 Thread Walter van Holst
On Thu, April 14, 2011 10:43, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Nowadays modern desktop systems are providing the capability to search
> your files, e. g. by content.
> Normally it is supported by indexing services, so it should give you
> quick answer to
> arbitrary questions. Proposing a filename is not such an importing
> feature, IMHO.
> And it is not easy to get it right. I' always expect different points
> of view, how this should work.

It definitely is not easy to get 100% right, 80% would be interesting
enough. I disagree on the desktop search bit, that is mostly helpful
if you know a lot about the document you are looking for.

I would find a name-suggester that would take:

The current date, e.g. 20110414, an abbreviation of the style you are
using, for example 'LTR' for letters and the subject of the document
plus a version number

useful.

The most work is probably expanding the various document styles to
include a field that refers to another field that is the most suitable
source for the subject and an abbreviation scheme.

And this assumes of course that people rarely use their own document
styles.

Regards,

 Walter



Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 6)

2010-09-16 Thread Walter van Holst
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT), Marcelo Acuña
mv...@yahoo.com.ar wrote:
 Tarballs can be found at
 ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.0/
 
 What is LyX-2.0.0alpha6+qt4.dmg?

That is for those among us who sacrifice loads of money on their
translucent white altars of Steve, the demi-god with the Reality
Distortion Field, cultists of OS X.

Regards,

 Walter


Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 6)

2010-09-16 Thread Walter van Holst
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT), Marcelo Acuña
mv...@yahoo.com.ar wrote:
 Tarballs can be found at
 ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.0/
 
 What is LyX-2.0.0alpha6+qt4.dmg?

That is for those among us who sacrifice loads of money on their
translucent white altars of Steve, the demi-god with the Reality
Distortion Field, cultists of OS X.

Regards,

 Walter


Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 6)

2010-09-16 Thread Walter van Holst
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT), Marcelo Acuña
 wrote:
>> Tarballs can be found at
>> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.0/
> 
> What is LyX-2.0.0alpha6+qt4.dmg?

That is for those among us who sacrifice loads of money on their
translucent white altars of Steve, the demi-god with the Reality
Distortion Field, cultists of OS X.

Regards,

 Walter


Re: Fwd: Re: things that I miss in lyx

2010-03-23 Thread Walter van Holst
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:15:08 +0100, Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Yup, this is what I think, but when you have several coworkers working
 on collaborative papers in several different LaTeX classes, they
 finally have the last laugh. This is why a layout editor would do
 wonders to convert our main target, people that already uses LaTeX
 directly who wants to speed up their writing and track changes on the
 document.

I would love to have a layout editor in LyX. There is still lots of
untapped potential for LyX. I'm a legal professional and none in that
profession doesn't have a visceral hate for Word's abilities to destroy a
contract's structure.

Regards,

 Walter


Re: Fwd: Re: things that I miss in lyx

2010-03-23 Thread Walter van Holst
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:15:08 +0100, Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Yup, this is what I think, but when you have several coworkers working
 on collaborative papers in several different LaTeX classes, they
 finally have the last laugh. This is why a layout editor would do
 wonders to convert our main target, people that already uses LaTeX
 directly who wants to speed up their writing and track changes on the
 document.

I would love to have a layout editor in LyX. There is still lots of
untapped potential for LyX. I'm a legal professional and none in that
profession doesn't have a visceral hate for Word's abilities to destroy a
contract's structure.

Regards,

 Walter


Re: Fwd: Re: things that I miss in lyx

2010-03-23 Thread Walter van Holst
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:15:08 +0100, Julio Rojas 
wrote:

> Yup, this is what I think, but when you have several coworkers working
> on collaborative papers in several different LaTeX classes, they
> finally have the last laugh. This is why a layout editor would do
> wonders to convert our main target, people that already uses LaTeX
> directly who wants to speed up their writing and track changes on the
> document.

I would love to have a layout editor in LyX. There is still lots of
untapped potential for LyX. I'm a legal professional and none in that
profession doesn't have a visceral hate for Word's abilities to destroy a
contract's structure.

Regards,

 Walter


Fwd: Re: things that I miss in lyx

2010-03-22 Thread Walter van Holst


 Original Message 
Subject: Re: things that I miss in lyx
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:51:24 +0100
From: Walter van Holst walter.van.ho...@xs4all.nl
To: Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com

On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:23:34 +0100, Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 In no special order, things that I miss in lyx...
 
 1. incremental search
 
 2. sentence autocapitalization

As others have written, NO! IN THE NAME OF EVERYTHING THAT IS HOLY, DON'T!

 3. grammar check (not crucial)

Grammar checks are non-trivial, it would be nice to have this in a modular
way so we can share this with other open source efforts in this field.


 4. search highlight occurences

Even nicer, the search implemented by Apple's Preview document viewer
provides a side bar with frequency bars of the search term's occurence on
each page.

 7. the rest of the world operates on rich text/html. LyX doesn't
(clipboard
 integration is poor, copy-pasting from/to web loses formatting)

Actuall, I prefer the current default of losing formatting. The whole
point of LyX is that you focus on structure and content and have LaTeX
take
care of formatting. The rest of the world operates on a fundamentally
braindead paradigm and if I wanted to use that paradigm I'd be a happy OOo
camper. Which I am not.

 8. 'pasted from' and url for every paste from the web (onenote uses this
 and
 it's damn inspired)

That sounds good. Some Zotero-like stuff might be helpful too.

Regards,

 Walter



Fwd: Re: things that I miss in lyx

2010-03-22 Thread Walter van Holst


 Original Message 
Subject: Re: things that I miss in lyx
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:51:24 +0100
From: Walter van Holst walter.van.ho...@xs4all.nl
To: Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com

On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:23:34 +0100, Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 In no special order, things that I miss in lyx...
 
 1. incremental search
 
 2. sentence autocapitalization

As others have written, NO! IN THE NAME OF EVERYTHING THAT IS HOLY, DON'T!

 3. grammar check (not crucial)

Grammar checks are non-trivial, it would be nice to have this in a modular
way so we can share this with other open source efforts in this field.


 4. search highlight occurences

Even nicer, the search implemented by Apple's Preview document viewer
provides a side bar with frequency bars of the search term's occurence on
each page.

 7. the rest of the world operates on rich text/html. LyX doesn't
(clipboard
 integration is poor, copy-pasting from/to web loses formatting)

Actuall, I prefer the current default of losing formatting. The whole
point of LyX is that you focus on structure and content and have LaTeX
take
care of formatting. The rest of the world operates on a fundamentally
braindead paradigm and if I wanted to use that paradigm I'd be a happy OOo
camper. Which I am not.

 8. 'pasted from' and url for every paste from the web (onenote uses this
 and
 it's damn inspired)

That sounds good. Some Zotero-like stuff might be helpful too.

Regards,

 Walter



Fwd: Re: things that I miss in lyx

2010-03-22 Thread Walter van Holst


 Original Message 
Subject: Re: things that I miss in lyx
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:51:24 +0100
From: Walter van Holst <walter.van.ho...@xs4all.nl>
To: Jose Quesada <ques...@gmail.com>

On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:23:34 +0100, Jose Quesada <ques...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In no special order, things that I miss in lyx...
> 
> 1. incremental search
> 
> 2. sentence autocapitalization

As others have written, NO! IN THE NAME OF EVERYTHING THAT IS HOLY, DON'T!

> 3. grammar check (not crucial)

Grammar checks are non-trivial, it would be nice to have this in a modular
way so we can share this with other open source efforts in this field.


> 4. search highlight occurences

Even nicer, the search implemented by Apple's Preview document viewer
provides a side bar with frequency bars of the search term's occurence on
each page.

> 7. the rest of the world operates on rich text/html. LyX doesn't
(clipboard
> integration is poor, copy-pasting from/to web loses formatting)

Actuall, I prefer the current default of losing formatting. The whole
point of LyX is that you focus on structure and content and have LaTeX
take
care of formatting. The rest of the world operates on a fundamentally
braindead paradigm and if I wanted to use that paradigm I'd be a happy OOo
camper. Which I am not.

> 8. 'pasted from' and url for every paste from the web (onenote uses this
> and
> it's damn inspired)

That sounds good. Some Zotero-like stuff might be helpful too.

Regards,

 Walter



Re: Unavailable document classes [OSX]

2009-06-07 Thread Walter van Holst

BH schreef:


I really have no idea. We check all the standard locations for LaTeX
installations, and I don't remember other reports of such problems.
(Does anyone else experience this? If so, please give some details
about your system and LaTeX installation ... and anything unusual you
might have done.)


It turns out to be a somewhat outdated LaTeX installation. And me 
overlooking the red tick in the LyX installer. :-(


Regards,

 Walter


Re: Unavailable document classes [OSX]

2009-06-07 Thread Walter van Holst

BH schreef:


I really have no idea. We check all the standard locations for LaTeX
installations, and I don't remember other reports of such problems.
(Does anyone else experience this? If so, please give some details
about your system and LaTeX installation ... and anything unusual you
might have done.)


It turns out to be a somewhat outdated LaTeX installation. And me 
overlooking the red tick in the LyX installer. :-(


Regards,

 Walter


Re: Unavailable document classes [OSX]

2009-06-07 Thread Walter van Holst

BH schreef:


I really have no idea. We check all the standard locations for LaTeX
installations, and I don't remember other reports of such problems.
(Does anyone else experience this? If so, please give some details
about your system and LaTeX installation ... and anything unusual you
might have done.)


It turns out to be a somewhat outdated LaTeX installation. And me 
overlooking the red tick in the LyX installer. :-(


Regards,

 Walter


Unavailable document classes

2009-06-05 Thread Walter van Holst

Hello,

I'm a somewhat infrequent user of LyX on Mac OS X. About every other 
update (my current version is 1.6.1), most of the document classes 
become unavailable. That is LyX can edit documents in them, but not 
produce output.


How do I prevent this from happening? This is an exceedingly annoying 
'feature' of LyX.


Regards,

 Walter


Unavailable document classes

2009-06-05 Thread Walter van Holst

Hello,

I'm a somewhat infrequent user of LyX on Mac OS X. About every other 
update (my current version is 1.6.1), most of the document classes 
become unavailable. That is LyX can edit documents in them, but not 
produce output.


How do I prevent this from happening? This is an exceedingly annoying 
'feature' of LyX.


Regards,

 Walter


Unavailable document classes

2009-06-05 Thread Walter van Holst

Hello,

I'm a somewhat infrequent user of LyX on Mac OS X. About every other 
update (my current version is 1.6.1), most of the document classes 
become unavailable. That is LyX can edit documents in them, but not 
produce output.


How do I prevent this from happening? This is an exceedingly annoying 
'feature' of LyX.


Regards,

 Walter


Re: Self-publishing with LyX

2007-08-31 Thread Walter van Holst

Typhoon wrote:


I have recompiled it with \usepackage{lmodern} as suggested earlier.
Could you, and others with problems, download it from
http://web.aanet.com.au/sage/lyx.pdf and report the results?


It now looks much better on my system. Thanks!

Regards,

 Walter


Re: Self-publishing with LyX

2007-08-31 Thread Walter van Holst

Typhoon wrote:


I have recompiled it with \usepackage{lmodern} as suggested earlier.
Could you, and others with problems, download it from
http://web.aanet.com.au/sage/lyx.pdf and report the results?


It now looks much better on my system. Thanks!

Regards,

 Walter


Re: Self-publishing with LyX

2007-08-31 Thread Walter van Holst

Typhoon wrote:


I have recompiled it with \usepackage{lmodern} as suggested earlier.
Could you, and others with problems, download it from
http://web.aanet.com.au/sage/lyx.pdf and report the results?


It now looks much better on my system. Thanks!

Regards,

 Walter


Re: Self-publishing with LyX

2007-08-29 Thread Walter van Holst

Typhoon wrote:

Hmmm. I guess so. If that offends, you can download from 


http://web.aanet.com.au/sage/lyx.pdf


Thanks for that.

The bad news is that Apple Preview doesn't render it too nicely. I guess 
it suffers from the same font problem that others have mentioned.


Regards,

 Walter


Re: Self-publishing with LyX

2007-08-29 Thread Walter van Holst

Typhoon wrote:

Hmmm. I guess so. If that offends, you can download from 


http://web.aanet.com.au/sage/lyx.pdf


Thanks for that.

The bad news is that Apple Preview doesn't render it too nicely. I guess 
it suffers from the same font problem that others have mentioned.


Regards,

 Walter


Re: Self-publishing with LyX

2007-08-29 Thread Walter van Holst

Typhoon wrote:

Hmmm. I guess so. If that offends, you can download from 


http://web.aanet.com.au/sage/lyx.pdf


Thanks for that.

The bad news is that Apple Preview doesn't render it too nicely. I guess 
it suffers from the same font problem that others have mentioned.


Regards,

 Walter


Re: lyx 1.3.6 on mac os tiger

2005-09-07 Thread Walter van Holst

Bennett Helm wrote:



This was a bug in the 1st version of the installer file. The fix for 
those who have already run the installer is:


In Preferences  Paths  PATH Prefix, enter 
/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin- 
current:/usr/X11R6/bin:/sw/bin:/opt/local/teTeX/bin (without the 
quotes).


Now try reconfiguring LyX; restart; reconfigure LyX; restart again. 
That should fix it. (I'm not sure why 2 reconfigures and restarts are 
needed, but I don't have 10.4 to experiment on.)


This did the trick for me, are there any plans to fix this in the 
installer? Or at least to mention it on the Wiki?


What I stil don't get is that several document classes that used to work 
in 1.3.4 are now gone, such as curriculum vitae and several article 
document klasses (Kluwer, Elsevier, Springer).


Regards,

Walter


Re: lyx 1.3.6 on mac os tiger

2005-09-07 Thread Walter van Holst

Bennett Helm wrote:

The installer has been fixed; the trouble is that those who used the  
1st version of the installer have to implement the fix manually.  (Sorry.)


Well, it works now, so never mind. Putting a message on the Wiki 
regarding this particular issue might be helpful though.


What I stil don't get is that several document classes that used to  
work in 1.3.4 are now gone, such as curriculum vitae and several  
article document klasses (Kluwer, Elsevier, Springer).



Support for these classes should be there. Look in LyX.app/Contents/ 
Resources/lyx/layouts for the .layout files LyX uses. You'll need to  
be sure your TeX installation includes the relevant .cls files, though.


The .layout files are there and I am using the TeX i-packages, how do I 
check whether those .cls files are included or not?


Regards,

Walter


Re: lyx 1.3.6 on mac os tiger

2005-09-07 Thread Walter van Holst

Bennett Helm wrote:



This was a bug in the 1st version of the installer file. The fix for 
those who have already run the installer is:


In Preferences  Paths  PATH Prefix, enter 
/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin- 
current:/usr/X11R6/bin:/sw/bin:/opt/local/teTeX/bin (without the 
quotes).


Now try reconfiguring LyX; restart; reconfigure LyX; restart again. 
That should fix it. (I'm not sure why 2 reconfigures and restarts are 
needed, but I don't have 10.4 to experiment on.)


This did the trick for me, are there any plans to fix this in the 
installer? Or at least to mention it on the Wiki?


What I stil don't get is that several document classes that used to work 
in 1.3.4 are now gone, such as curriculum vitae and several article 
document klasses (Kluwer, Elsevier, Springer).


Regards,

Walter


Re: lyx 1.3.6 on mac os tiger

2005-09-07 Thread Walter van Holst

Bennett Helm wrote:

The installer has been fixed; the trouble is that those who used the  
1st version of the installer have to implement the fix manually.  (Sorry.)


Well, it works now, so never mind. Putting a message on the Wiki 
regarding this particular issue might be helpful though.


What I stil don't get is that several document classes that used to  
work in 1.3.4 are now gone, such as curriculum vitae and several  
article document klasses (Kluwer, Elsevier, Springer).



Support for these classes should be there. Look in LyX.app/Contents/ 
Resources/lyx/layouts for the .layout files LyX uses. You'll need to  
be sure your TeX installation includes the relevant .cls files, though.


The .layout files are there and I am using the TeX i-packages, how do I 
check whether those .cls files are included or not?


Regards,

Walter


Re: lyx 1.3.6 on mac os tiger

2005-09-07 Thread Walter van Holst

Bennett Helm wrote:



This was a bug in the 1st version of the installer file. The fix for 
those who have already run the installer is:


In Preferences > Paths > PATH Prefix, enter 
"/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin- 
current:/usr/X11R6/bin:/sw/bin:/opt/local/teTeX/bin" (without the 
quotes).


Now try reconfiguring LyX; restart; reconfigure LyX; restart again. 
That should fix it. (I'm not sure why 2 reconfigures and restarts are 
needed, but I don't have 10.4 to experiment on.)


This did the trick for me, are there any plans to fix this in the 
installer? Or at least to mention it on the Wiki?


What I stil don't get is that several document classes that used to work 
in 1.3.4 are now gone, such as curriculum vitae and several article 
document klasses (Kluwer, Elsevier, Springer).


Regards,

Walter


Re: lyx 1.3.6 on mac os tiger

2005-09-07 Thread Walter van Holst

Bennett Helm wrote:

The installer has been fixed; the trouble is that those who used the  
1st version of the installer have to implement the fix manually.  (Sorry.)


Well, it works now, so never mind. Putting a message on the Wiki 
regarding this particular issue might be helpful though.


What I stil don't get is that several document classes that used to  
work in 1.3.4 are now gone, such as curriculum vitae and several  
article document klasses (Kluwer, Elsevier, Springer).



Support for these classes should be there. Look in LyX.app/Contents/ 
Resources/lyx/layouts for the .layout files LyX uses. You'll need to  
be sure your TeX installation includes the relevant .cls files, though.


The .layout files are there and I am using the TeX i-packages, how do I 
check whether those .cls files are included or not?


Regards,

Walter