Re: Tex2Lyx

2013-07-16 Thread Hayuning 
All,

Thanks, I will try ubuntu version then.


Greeting,

Hayu

Re: Tex2Lyx

2013-07-16 Thread Hayuning 
All,

Thanks, I will try ubuntu version then.


Greeting,

Hayu

Re: Tex2Lyx

2013-07-16 Thread Hayuning 
All,

Thanks, I will try ubuntu version then.


Greeting,

Hayu

Tex2Lyx

2013-07-15 Thread Hayuning 
Hello,

In the announcement of the latest version, Lyx 2.0.6, it is said that they add 
new option -m to select needed modules (bug 8393).

We know that one of the Lyx issues is that if we import Tex file to Lyx, it 
does not recognize the theorem module, instead it will appear as ERT.

With that new option in Lyx 2.0.6, does it mean the above issue is resolved?
If yes, can anybody tell me how to do that?

I tried to import tex file, but the theorem still appeared in ERT form.

Thank you.

Hayu

Tex2Lyx

2013-07-15 Thread Hayuning 
Hello,

In the announcement of the latest version, Lyx 2.0.6, it is said that they add 
new option -m to select needed modules (bug 8393).

We know that one of the Lyx issues is that if we import Tex file to Lyx, it 
does not recognize the theorem module, instead it will appear as ERT.

With that new option in Lyx 2.0.6, does it mean the above issue is resolved?
If yes, can anybody tell me how to do that?

I tried to import tex file, but the theorem still appeared in ERT form.

Thank you.

Hayu

Tex2Lyx

2013-07-15 Thread Hayuning 
Hello,

In the announcement of the latest version, Lyx 2.0.6, it is said that they add 
new option -m to select needed modules (bug 8393).

We know that one of the Lyx issues is that if we import Tex file to Lyx, it 
does not recognize the theorem module, instead it will appear as ERT.

With that new option in Lyx 2.0.6, does it mean the above issue is resolved?
If yes, can anybody tell me how to do that?

I tried to import tex file, but the theorem still appeared in ERT form.

Thank you.

Hayu