not really any harder than it used to be to insert the marker
lines...
So you see, this is already a non-issue for me. I just wish I had found the
new spellchecker's behavior to be a little more stable.
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| * * Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
It would appear that on Sep 23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say:
While waiting in hopes of a better method, I figured out a very crude down
and dirty work around...
First, as previously described, I wrap the section of the document I intend to
spellcheck with the the begin and end marker
not really any harder than it used to be to insert the marker
lines...
So you see, this is already a non-issue for me. I just wish I had found the
new spellchecker's behavior to be a little more stable.
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| * * Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
It would appear that on Sep 23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say:
While waiting in hopes of a better method, I figured out a very crude down
and dirty work around...
First, as previously described, I wrap the section of the document I intend to
spellcheck with the the begin and end marker
cument and checking it
there. It's not really any harder than it used to be to insert the marker
lines...
So you see, this is already a non-issue for me. I just wish I had found the
new spellchecker's behavior to be a little more stable.
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| <*> <*> Joe (theWordy) Philb
It would appear that on Sep 23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say:
> While waiting in hopes of a better method, I figured out a very crude down
> and dirty work around...
>
> First, as previously described, I wrap the section of the document I intend to
> spellcheck with the th
It would appear that on Sep 25, Stephan Witt did say:
Am 25.09.2011 um 00:02 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
Note: As I said I positioned my cursor *_AFTER_* the first instance of the
gabaggge word... (And I note that I also double checked the file:
~/.lyx/pwl_english.dict to make
It would appear that on Sep 25, Stephan Witt did say:
Am 25.09.2011 um 00:02 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
Note: As I said I positioned my cursor *_AFTER_* the first instance of the
gabaggge word... (And I note that I also double checked the file:
~/.lyx/pwl_english.dict to make
It would appear that on Sep 25, Stephan Witt did say:
> Am 25.09.2011 um 00:02 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
> > Note: As I said I positioned my cursor *_AFTER_* the first instance of the
> > "gabaggge" word... (And I note that I also double checked the file:
>
It would appear that on Sep 24, Stephan Witt did say:
Am 23.09.2011 um 23:32 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
-snipped. . . .. . . .. .stuff
Then I'd position the cursor someplace after the non-word gabaggge on
the first marker and press F7
It would appear that on Sep 24, Stephan Witt did say:
Am 23.09.2011 um 23:32 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
-snipped. . . .. . . .. .stuff
Then I'd position the cursor someplace after the non-word gabaggge on
the first marker and press F7
It would appear that on Sep 24, Stephan Witt did say:
> Am 23.09.2011 um 23:32 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
-snipped. . . .. . . .. .stuff
> > Then I'd position the cursor someplace after the non-word "gabaggge" on
> > the
tell it
to.
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
It would appear that on Sep 23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say:
-snipped. . . .. . . .. .stuff
IS there a method to restrict the spellchecker to a limited range of the
document and/or to only check in a top to bottom in-line path that doesn't
skip around
tell it
to.
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
It would appear that on Sep 23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say:
-snipped. . . .. . . .. .stuff
IS there a method to restrict the spellchecker to a limited range of the
document and/or to only check in a top to bottom in-line path that doesn't
skip around
pell checker that won't work where I tell it
to.
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
|\___/ <<jtw...@ttlc.net>>
It would appear that on Sep 23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say:
-snipped. . . .. . . .. .stuff
> IS there a method to restrict the spellchecker to a limited range of the
> document and/or to only check in a top to bottom in-line path that doesn't
!
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
It would appear that on Jun 14, David L. Johnson did say:
On 06/14/2011 11:52 AM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
I may be a bit too dependent on
the various package management systems on my installed distros but
most of the time this saves me a lot of dependency headaches.
I don't
!
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
It would appear that on Jun 14, David L. Johnson did say:
On 06/14/2011 11:52 AM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
I may be a bit too dependent on
the various package management systems on my installed distros but
most of the time this saves me a lot of dependency headaches.
I don't
..
If anyone is experiencing symptoms like that with their copy of LyX...
Please tell me!
--
| ~^~ ~^~
|Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
|\___/ <<jtw...@ttlc.net>>
It would appear that on Jun 14, David L. Johnson did say:
> On 06/14/2011 11:52 AM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
>
> > I may be a bit too dependent on
> > the various package management systems on my installed distros but
> > most of the time this saves me a lot
It would appear that on Jun 6, Stephan Witt did say:
Am 04.06.2011 um 03:38 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
I've also notices another oddness. according to those Spellchecker
preferences I do still have aspell selected as my spellchecker.
but when (as I mentioned in my previous post) I
It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say:
You can freely relocate the side-bar to your wishes.
WARNING: LyX seems to crash often when you do.
On 5-6-2011 16:23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
Well if it wouldn't make it crash... I might prefer it took up some
It would appear that on Jun 6, Stephan Witt did say:
Am 06.06.2011 um 18:23 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
OK, whether or not my keyboard shortcut issues are resolved (or limited to
the version that may have been modified by the PCLinuxOS maintainers) I'm
going to need to understand
It would appear that on Jun 6, Stephan Witt did say:
Am 04.06.2011 um 03:38 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
I've also notices another oddness. according to those Spellchecker
preferences I do still have aspell selected as my spellchecker.
but when (as I mentioned in my previous post) I
It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say:
You can freely relocate the side-bar to your wishes.
WARNING: LyX seems to crash often when you do.
On 5-6-2011 16:23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
Well if it wouldn't make it crash... I might prefer it took up some
It would appear that on Jun 6, Stephan Witt did say:
Am 06.06.2011 um 18:23 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
OK, whether or not my keyboard shortcut issues are resolved (or limited to
the version that may have been modified by the PCLinuxOS maintainers) I'm
going to need to understand
It would appear that on Jun 6, Stephan Witt did say:
> Am 04.06.2011 um 03:38 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
> > I've also notices another oddness. according to those Spellchecker
> > preferences I do still have aspell selected as my spellchecker.
> > but when (as I men
It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say:
> You can freely relocate the side-bar to your wishes.
>
> WARNING: LyX seems to crash often when you do.
>
> On 5-6-2011 16:23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> >
> > Well if it wouldn't make it cras
It would appear that on Jun 6, Stephan Witt did say:
> Am 06.06.2011 um 18:23 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
> > OK, whether or not my keyboard shortcut issues are resolved (or limited to
> > the version that may have been modified by the PCLinuxOS maintainers) I'm
&g
.
--
|^^^ ^^^
|o o Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
|^ J(tWdy)P
| ___ jtw...@ttlc.net
sigh
.
--
|^^^ ^^^
|o o Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
|^ J(tWdy)P
| ___ jtw...@ttlc.net
sigh
when I'm done spellchecking...
But thanks for the suggestion.
--
| ^^^ ^^^
| Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
|^ J(tWdy)P
| ___ <<jtw...@ttlc.net>>
a different part of the document than I had ‘marked’
for spell checking...
--
|^^^ ^^^
|o o Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
|^ `J(tWdy)P
| ___ jtw...@ttlc.net
| ' `
It would appear that on Jun 4, Charlie did say:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote:
This is worse than those
distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting
under unrecognized words. I don't like those because
a different part of the document than I had ‘marked’
for spell checking...
--
|^^^ ^^^
|o o Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
|^ `J(tWdy)P
| ___ jtw...@ttlc.net
| ' `
It would appear that on Jun 4, Charlie did say:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote:
This is worse than those
distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting
under unrecognized words. I don't like those because
part of the document than I had ‘marked’
for spell checking...
--
|^^^ ^^^
| Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
|^ `J(tWdy)P
| ___ <<jtw...@ttlc.net>>
| ' `
It would appear that on Jun 4, Charlie did say:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400
> "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" <jtw...@ttlc.net> wrote:
>
> > This is worse than those
> > distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting
> > u
It would appear that on Apr 16, Jürgen Spitzmüller did say:
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
Is there a reason why LyX's implementation of aspell chokes on ' characters
used as single quotes???
Because they are no single quotes, but apostrophes. In order to insert single
quotes, hit Alt
It would appear that on Apr 16, Jürgen Spitzmüller did say:
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
Is there a reason why LyX's implementation of aspell chokes on ' characters
used as single quotes???
Because they are no single quotes, but apostrophes. In order to insert single
quotes, hit Alt
It would appear that on Apr 16, Jürgen Spitzmüller did say:
> Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> > Is there a reason why LyX's implementation of aspell chokes on ' characters
> > used as single quotes???
>
> Because they are no single quotes, but apostrophes. In order to in
on both sides such as
in the contraction it's...
Is there a reason why LyX's implementation of aspell chokes on ' characters
used as single quotes???
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
on both sides such as
in the contraction it's...
Is there a reason why LyX's implementation of aspell chokes on ' characters
used as single quotes???
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
to be part of a word unless it's wrapped in letters on both sides such as
in the contraction "it's"...
Is there a reason why LyX's implementation of aspell chokes on ' characters
used as single quotes???
--
| ~^~ ~^~
|Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
|\___/ <<jtw...@ttlc.net>>
than me could maybe tell me what I'm
doing wrong. But I can't remember if attachments make it to this list via
gmane's usenet mirror. We shall see...;-7
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net#LyX 1.6.5 created
to 'automatically'
compensate for this LaTeX quirk is it feasible that a line length
element could someday be added to LyX's paragraph settings???
It would appear that on Apr 3, Steve Litt did say:
On Saturday 03 April 2010 02:48:12 Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
I get similar, but slightly better
than me could maybe tell me what I'm
doing wrong. But I can't remember if attachments make it to this list via
gmane's usenet mirror. We shall see...;-7
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net#LyX 1.6.5 created
to 'automatically'
compensate for this LaTeX quirk is it feasible that a line length
element could someday be added to LyX's paragraph settings???
It would appear that on Apr 3, Steve Litt did say:
On Saturday 03 April 2010 02:48:12 Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
I get similar, but slightly better
he resulting .lyx file
to this message. So someone smarter than me could maybe tell me what I'm
doing wrong. But I can't remember if attachments make it to this list via
gmane's usenet mirror. We shall see... ;-7
--
| ~^~ ~^~
|Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^J
of a document?
One other thought, even if LyX can't be expected to 'automatically'
compensate for this LaTeX "quirk" is it feasible that a line length
element could someday be added to LyX's paragraph settings???
It would appear that on Apr 3, Steve Litt did say:
>
> On Saturday 03 A
It would appear that on Feb 23, Helge Hafting did say:
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
The sequence is the TOC followed by a tex code box containing:
\mainmatter
\pagenumbering{roman}
Then a few short chapter*(s) That are not part of the numbered chapters.
And it is not desired
developers. Lyx is
a wonderful tool...
On that I think we agree! ;-)
...even if my WinEdt addict friends at the lab keep laughing at me for
using it. :D
In the long run, I think the joke's on them...
--
| --- ___
| 0 - Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
It would appear that on Feb 23, Helge Hafting did say:
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
The sequence is the TOC followed by a tex code box containing:
\mainmatter
\pagenumbering{roman}
Then a few short chapter*(s) That are not part of the numbered chapters.
And it is not desired
developers. Lyx is
a wonderful tool...
On that I think we agree! ;-)
...even if my WinEdt addict friends at the lab keep laughing at me for
using it. :D
In the long run, I think the joke's on them...
--
| --- ___
| 0 - Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
It would appear that on Feb 23, Helge Hafting did say:
> Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> > The sequence is the TOC followed by a tex code box containing:
> > \mainmatter
> > \pagenumbering{roman}
> >
> > Then a few short chapter*(s) That are
Again, I have to give my most sincere thanks to all developers. Lyx is
> a wonderful tool...
On that I think we agree! ;-)
> ...even if my WinEdt addict friends at the lab keep laughing at me for
> using it. :D
In the long run, I think the joke's on them...
--
| --- ___
| <0>
for me would simply be wrapped in ERT boxes...
But as it is, You already gave me the exact solution I wanted for the
current project.
Thanks!
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| * * Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
| \___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
for me would simply be wrapped in ERT boxes...
But as it is, You already gave me the exact solution I wanted for the
current project.
Thanks!
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| * * Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
| \___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
ing) some of the keywords in your reply. That would likely lead to
LaTeX solutions which for me would simply be wrapped in ERT boxes...
But as it is, You already gave me the exact solution I wanted for the
current project.
Thanks!
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| <*> <*> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
| \___/ <<jtw...@ttlc.net>>
...
Thanks!
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| * * Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
| \___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
...
Thanks!
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| * * Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
| \___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
kaput...
Thanks!
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| <*> <*> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
| \___/ <<jtw...@ttlc.net>>
The sequence is the TOC followed by a tex code box containing:
\mainmatter
\pagenumbering{roman}
Then a few short chapter*(s) That are not part of the numbered chapters.
And it is not desired for them to be labeled as contents in the output
(pdf)
Then there is another tex code box containing:
The sequence is the TOC followed by a tex code box containing:
\mainmatter
\pagenumbering{roman}
Then a few short chapter*(s) That are not part of the numbered chapters.
And it is not desired for them to be labeled as contents in the output
(pdf)
Then there is another tex code box containing:
The sequence is the TOC followed by a tex code box containing:
\mainmatter
\pagenumbering{roman}
Then a few short chapter*(s) That are not part of the numbered chapters.
And it is not desired for them to be labeled as "contents" in the output
(pdf)
Then there is another tex code box containing:
It would appear that on Jan 15, Helge Hafting did say:
Very good explanation - could you file in the bug tracker, where the
developers will find it? URL:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
It would appear that on Jan 16, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say:
OK! Just did that. SNIP
It would appear that on Jan 15, Helge Hafting did say:
Very good explanation - could you file in the bug tracker, where the
developers will find it? URL:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
It would appear that on Jan 16, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say:
OK! Just did that. SNIP
It would appear that on Jan 15, Helge Hafting did say:
> Very good explanation - could you file in the bug tracker, where the
> developers will find it? URL:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
It would appear that on Jan 16, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say:
>
Bye!
But in any case, it's in there somewhere.
--
| --- ___
| 0 - Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
|~\___/~ jtw...@ttlc.net
Bye!
But in any case, it's in there somewhere.
--
| --- ___
| 0 - Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
|~\___/~ jtw...@ttlc.net
gets home Bye!
But in any case, it's in there somewhere.
--
| --- ___
| <0> <-> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
|~\___/~ <<jtw...@ttlc.net>>
???
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
???
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
ed any time soon???
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
|\___/ <<jtw...@ttlc.net>>
It would appear that on Sep 14, Todd Denniston did say:
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote, On 12/23/-28158 02:59 PM:
Personally I don't think that's ever going to happen any more than I
think anybody will ever offer a list server with a smart digest option
that includes some kind of header
It would appear that on Sep 14, Todd Denniston did say:
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote, On 12/23/-28158 02:59 PM:
Personally I don't think that's ever going to happen any more than I
think anybody will ever offer a list server with a smart digest option
that includes some kind of header
It would appear that on Sep 14, Todd Denniston did say:
> Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote, On 12/23/-28158 02:59 PM:
> > Personally I don't think that's ever going to happen any more than I
> > think anybody will ever offer a list server with a smart digest option
> > th
from lists that do add them,
would you kindly explain it to me???
Because if I knew how to do that I'd no longer mind it when some list
manager decides to add Subject: tags to a list I'm reading...
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| * * Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
from lists that do add them,
would you kindly explain it to me???
Because if I knew how to do that I'd no longer mind it when some list
manager decides to add Subject: tags to a list I'm reading...
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| * * Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
use procmail to
strip such tags from the messages I get from lists that do add them,
would you kindly explain it to me???
Because if I knew how to do that I'd no longer mind it when some list
manager decides to add Subject: tags to a list I'm reading...
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| <*> <*> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
| \___/ <<jtw...@ttlc.net>>
.
If your going to remove the clasic.ui could you tell me which remaining
.ui file results in the closest match to the actual user interface?
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
.
If your going to remove the clasic.ui could you tell me which remaining
.ui file results in the closest match to the actual user interface?
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
.ui files.
If your going to remove the "clasic.ui" could you tell me which remaining
.ui file results in the closest match to the actual user interface?
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
|\___/ <<jtw...@ttlc.net>>
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook (5K) . | |-Re: Drag and Dr
A 1915 Aug 1 Steve Litt (6K) . | | \-Keyboard Cent
* 1916 Aug 5 Joe(theWordy)Philbrook (5K) | | \-Re: Keyboar
1917 Aug 6 Helge Hafting(6K) . | \-Re: Drag
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook (5K) . | |-Re: Drag and Dr
A 1915 Aug 1 Steve Litt (6K) . | | \-Keyboard Cent
* 1916 Aug 5 Joe(theWordy)Philbrook (5K) | | \-Re: Keyboar
1917 Aug 6 Helge Hafting(6K) . | \-Re: Drag
zak Younes(3K) . | |-Re: Drag and Dr
1913 Jul 31 Abdelrazak Younes(3K) | | \-Re: Drag and
* 1914 Aug 1 Joe(theWordy)Philbrook (5K) . | |-Re: Drag and Dr
A 1915 Aug 1 Steve Litt (6K) . | | \-Keyboard Cent
*
It would appear that on Aug 11, rgheck did say:
On 08/11/2009 07:41 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
Well Vincent, I'm glad to hear that it's supposed to work like that.
But it doesn't work that way for me...
--- snip ---
Perhaps this automagic behavior is dependent on the windowmanager
It would appear that on Aug 12, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW did say:
Perhaps this automagic behavior is dependent on the windowmanager?
Then you'd really have to try the Windows windowmanager :)
Now I'm feeling nauseous...
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| o oJoe (theWordy) Philbrook
technique to
temporarily hide them if you know just where/how to click/drag them?
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
It would appear that on Aug 13, rgheck did say:
ViewToolbars?
I remember it used to be there in ver 1.5.6... But I can't find it in ver 1.6.3
But thanks...
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| * * Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
| \___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
...
--
|^^^ ^^^
|o o Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
|^J(tWdy)P
| ___jtw...@ttlc.net
|
| sigh
It would appear that on Aug 11, rgheck did say:
On 08/11/2009 07:41 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
Well Vincent, I'm glad to hear that it's supposed to work like that.
But it doesn't work that way for me...
--- snip ---
Perhaps this automagic behavior is dependent on the windowmanager
It would appear that on Aug 12, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW did say:
Perhaps this automagic behavior is dependent on the windowmanager?
Then you'd really have to try the Windows windowmanager :)
Now I'm feeling nauseous...
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| o oJoe (theWordy) Philbrook
technique to
temporarily hide them if you know just where/how to click/drag them?
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| ? ? Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
|\___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
It would appear that on Aug 13, rgheck did say:
ViewToolbars?
I remember it used to be there in ver 1.5.6... But I can't find it in ver 1.6.3
But thanks...
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| * * Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
| \___/ jtw...@ttlc.net
...
--
|^^^ ^^^
|o o Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
|^J(tWdy)P
| ___jtw...@ttlc.net
|
| sigh
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
