Re: more on collaboration

2010/9/27 Gregory Jefferis jeffe...@gmail.com: On 2010-09-25 06:51, Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com wrote: I tried Gobby. it's as simple as notepad, so for serious programming/writing it'd feel a bit limited. But the deal breaker is no undo. Yes, you hear that right. I think Gobby is actually

Re: more on collaboration

2010/9/27 Gregory Jefferis jeffe...@gmail.com: On 2010-09-25 06:51, Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com wrote: I tried Gobby. it's as simple as notepad, so for serious programming/writing it'd feel a bit limited. But the deal breaker is no undo. Yes, you hear that right. I think Gobby is actually

Re: more on collaboration

2010/9/27 Gregory Jefferis : > On 2010-09-25 06:51, "Jose Quesada" wrote: > >> I tried Gobby. it's as simple as notepad, so for serious programming/writing >> it'd feel a bit limited. But the deal breaker is no undo. Yes, you hear that >> right. I think

Re: more on collaboration

. best regards, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A/B_Testing

Re: more on collaboration

. best regards, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A/B_Testing

Re: more on collaboration

if the intended audience of LyX is people who already are familiar with version control, there is probably no reason to look at what non-programmers do. best regards, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A/B_Testing

Re: more on collaboration

, they lose formatting and have to re-add references; they still do it). Even from the slightly geekier camp I've had lots of requests to install SubEthaEdit back when I ran OS X, so it's not just the non-geeks who get hooked on that stuff. best regards, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer

Re: more on collaboration

2010/9/24 Gregory Jefferis jeffe...@gmail.com: Non-interactive collaborative editing means that there can always be one live version of a document to which anyone can apply changes that are versioned, identified and much more likely.  Essentially it solves the conflicting merge problem by

Re: more on collaboration

, they lose formatting and have to re-add references; they still do it). Even from the slightly geekier camp I've had lots of requests to install SubEthaEdit back when I ran OS X, so it's not just the non-geeks who get hooked on that stuff. best regards, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer

Re: more on collaboration

2010/9/24 Gregory Jefferis jeffe...@gmail.com: Non-interactive collaborative editing means that there can always be one live version of a document to which anyone can apply changes that are versioned, identified and much more likely.  Essentially it solves the conflicting merge problem by

Re: more on collaboration

ocs and LyX, just because it's supposedly so much more convenient (yes, they lose formatting and have to re-add references; they still do it). Even from the slightly geekier camp I've had lots of requests to install SubEthaEdit back when I ran OS X, so it's not just the non-geeks who get hooked on that stuff. best regards, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer

Re: more on collaboration

2010/9/24 Gregory Jefferis : > Non-interactive collaborative editing means that there can always be one > live version of a document to which anyone can apply changes that are > versioned, identified and much more likely.  Essentially it solves the > conflicting merge problem

Re: query

://www.lyx.org/Download instead (or just follow the link from http://www.lyx.org ) hope this helps, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer

Re: query

://www.lyx.org/Download instead (or just follow the link from http://www.lyx.org ) hope this helps, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer

Re: query

lp me to download > Try http://www.lyx.org/Download instead (or just follow the link from http://www.lyx.org ) hope this helps, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer

Re: A bit OT - Jabref and citing web pages in lyx

not standard bibtex. The user shil88 in http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/1302/export-bibtex-webpage-specific-fieldsinformation-missing/ describes a hack to make Zotero export the date in the howpublished field, I don't know of any better solution :-/ best regards, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer

Re: A bit OT - Jabref and citing web pages in lyx

not standard bibtex. The user shil88 in http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/1302/export-bibtex-webpage-specific-fieldsinformation-missing/ describes a hack to make Zotero export the date in the howpublished field, I don't know of any better solution :-/ best regards, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer

Re: A bit OT - Jabref and citing web pages in lyx

the date in the "howpublished" field, I don't know of any better solution :-/ best regards, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer