"Piotr R. Sidorowicz" wrote:
> My suggestion, avail yourself of two removable HD trays and an extra HD
> (one for W2K, other for Linux), so you can swap from one to the other.
> I do not recommend both OSes on the same HD, as the Redmond product
> doesn't play nice, and has a nasty habit of corr
"Christopher M. Jones" wrote:
> I recall a while back someone found an early post to the LyX list, looking
> suspiciously like an announcement of the intended development of KDE. Here's
> the confirmation of this suspicion...
>
> http://freeos.com/articles/4070
>
> Martin Konold reports that
John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:30:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > I'm trying to install Lyx on my RedHat 7.1 but I'm having problems.
> >
> > Redhat 7.1 should come with LyX somewhere on the CDs.
>
> not any more, they dropped xforms from the powertools CD due to its
John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:30:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Redhat 7.1 should come with LyX somewhere on the CDs.
>
> not any more, they dropped xforms from the powertools CD due to its
> non-free status.
I just did a Google search and hit this page:
http://www.
Lars Gullik Bj nnes wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Hello,
> |
> | [Please let me know if this should have gone to lyx-devel instead.]
>
> LyX devel would probably have been better...
Next tiem I'll know better.
> Some dev
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 03:20:04PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > Baruch Even wrote:
> >
> > > * Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010717 18:47]:
> > >
> > > > Great. Since you are
Baruch Even wrote:
> * Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010717 18:47]:
>
> > Great. Since you are a lyx developper, I think we can safely
> > that your advice and continue to build using 0.89.
>
> I am one of the developers but this is my impression and th
Baruch Even wrote:
> I believe there was a conclusion to avoid that warning of using LyX with
> XForms 0.89, it is used by users and by the developers and no harm is
> known to happen from using 0.89
>
> I myself use 0.89 on Debian sid and see no problems with that.
Great. Since you are a lyx
Hello,
[Please let me know if this should have gone to lyx-devel instead.]
There's some discussion on a Debian mailing list (debian-french)
whether the Lyx package should be built against XForms 0.88 or
0.89. See also http://bugs.debian.org/105486
I couldn't find anything obvious on the lyx we
