José Matos wrote:
> On Sunday 30 May 2010 08:39:59 Alok Shukla wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> After configuring lyx-1.6.6.1 properly on my Fedora 13 laptop
>> when I run the make command, the compilation doesn't
>> get completed. Instead, it ends with the error message (relevant
>> portions
>>
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change
>>> will
>>> be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6
>>> as there is no need to issue an update wi
On 01/08/2010 10:55 AM, José Matos wrote:
On Friday 08 January 2010 13:58:39 Rex Dieter wrote:
No objection.
OK, thanks.
I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change will
be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 as
there is no
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 07 January 2010 22:40:32 rgheck wrote:
But ImageMagick, if I'm not mistaken, is the "default converter" that we
use not just for output but also for converting images to formats we can
display in LyX. It's the "converter of last resort". For t
Rex Dieter wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 14 November 2008 12:51:11 rgheck wrote:
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote:
Cool! i'm currently using v1.5.6 and a v1.6 update isn't yet available
for my platform (FC8 rpm)
Yes, but it's easy to compile yourself on FC8. Hard to know if 1.6 wi
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 14 November 2008 12:51:11 rgheck wrote:
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote:
Cool! i'm currently using v1.5.6 and a v1.6 update isn't yet available
for my platform (FC8 rpm)
Yes, but it's easy to compile yourself on FC8. Hard to know if 1.6 will
get packaged for FC8.
I suppos
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> It seems that removing kdelibs4 fixes it.
>
> So it's most likely a bug in Fedora's kdelibs4 package. Here's what I've
> just added to the RELEASE_NOTES of forthcoming LyX 1.5.3:
What is most likely, afaict, is that this is a bug in some version(
Neal Becker wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>>
>>> Neal Becker wrote:
In retrospect, the crash might be unrelated to the upgrade.
>>>
>>> Did you try my suggestion on bugzilla (uninstalling KDE4)?
>>>
>>> Jürgen
>>
>> Sorry, were you asking me? I don't have kd
Dalton, John L (John) wrote:
> I am trying to install lyx1.4.4 on a redhat enterprise 4 ws -
> workstation.
>
> I got it down to one dependencies:
>
> # rpm -ivh lyx-1.4.4-1.el4.i386.rpm
> warning: lyx-1.4.4-1.el4.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
> ff6382fa
> error: Failed dependencies:
William Adams wrote:
> All glyphs have been created and they're now doing a design review
> ``...establishing consistent sizes for various glyphs based on square
> or circle designsConfidence remains high that we will release the
> fonts some time in April.''
...
> http://www.stixfonts.org/ f
José Matos wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 1.5.0 (beta 1)
> ===
>
> We are glad to announce the release of LyX 1.5.0 (beta 1).
Are target release date for 1.5.0 (final)?
-- Rex
Shu Li wrote:
> I don't know if that's the problem of QT4 or Lyx
It's QT4
-- Rex
PaulCampbell wrote:
> I installed lyx on RedHat EW 4
I'd shamlessly recommend using the lyx rpm provided by
http://kde-redhat.sf.net/
RPM(s) available from
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/redhat/4/i386/stable/RPMS/
-- Rex
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
> I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
> Ridderström in:
>
> http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
Now that lyx is in Fedora Extras (and has been for some time), is
Georg Baum wrote:
> The strange thing is that heavy math editing works rather well for me in
> 1.4.3svn. What OS/distribution and what compiler do you use? We have
> reported crashes with gcc 4.1 that might be related to this, see e.g.
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2677
fc5/gcc-4.1, s
Subir Singh Lamba wrote:
> I am trying to install lyx-1.4.1 on Redhat9.
Or use the RPMS from kde-redhat,
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/redhat/9/RPMS.stable/
See http://kde-redhat.sf.net/ for details on apt/yum configuration.
You'll want to fetch install
lyx
and one of
lyx-qt, lyx-
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 10:55, John Pye wrote:
>> Is this issue known about? Do I need to investigate further, or wait for
>> a patch? :-)
>
> Yes, one temporary shortcut is to disable the display of images inside
> lyx.
>
> Preferences->Graphics->Display Graphics->Do no
Jernej Barbic wrote:
On my Red Hat Linux 9.0 system, lyx 1.4.0 manages to compile, but not link
(see below). The missing /usr/lib/libltdl.la file doesn't exist on my
system. Any ideas on how to fix this are very welcome.
Install the libtool rpm.
-- Rex
Todd Denniston wrote:
John Pye wrote:
In case people hadn't noticed, Lyx 1.4 was recently added to the Fedora
Core 4 Extras repository. So, if you are running on Fedora Core 4, you
can easily update to the latest Lyx using 'yum update', provided you
have your repositories set up correctly.
Fur
FYI, I pushed lyx-1.4.0-4 to Fedora Extras/4 today. Should be appearing
soon in repo/mirror near you.
-- Rex
Stephen Harris wrote:
I use rpmfind for instance with Google, I put
libAiksaurus and rpmfind in the search window and get
http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/fedora/devel/i386/aiksaurus-1.2.1-13.i386.html
FYI, One probably shouldn't be installing fedora-devel pkgs on fc4,
unless you *really* know wh
Tom Poe wrote:
I checked for xforms download, and ran into problems trying to locate
the proper file. The Redhat link for rpm, for example, gave me an error
message that it couldn't change ftp directory. Does anyone know where I
can download Xforms files? Or, should I try to use QT, and foll
B.J. Muirhead wrote:
Hi
I have compiled (using frontend and the suffix option, so no
problems there) and installed lyx-1.4.opre3 on an up to date ubuntu
system (using checkinstall in place of make install) but it didn't find
the aiksaurus library.
does anyone know if
--with -ex
Joao B. Oliveira wrote:
I am using Ubuntu (both 5.4 and 5.10) and several cm fonts are not
found by LyX, and I get messages like this:
Could not get font '-tex-cmr10-medium-r-normal--15-0-0-0-p-0-fontspecific-0'.
Using 'fixed'.
http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ/Qt
-- Rex
Paul Smith wrote:
On 9/17/05, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, mathml-fonts-1.0-18 has been released (or will be real-soon-now).
%changelog
* Thu Sep 15 2005 Rex Dieter 1.0-18
- replace latex-xft-fonts with bakoma4lyx
- remove non-distributable Math'ca fonts (#168405)
Paul Smith wrote:
On 9/15/05, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, mathml-fonts-1.0-18 has been released (or will be real-soon-now).
%changelog
* Thu Sep 15 2005 Rex Dieter 1.0-18
- replace latex-xft-fonts with bakoma4lyx
- remove non-distributable Math'ca fonts (#1684
Rex Dieter wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
For my Fedora Linux systems I prepared just such a collection, using
Rex's framework and making only the minimal changes to insert the
bakoma4lyx fonts and tighten up packaging. I inserted the bakoma4lyx
Readme.txt documentation to acknowledge the
Paul Johnson wrote:
Hello, font needing LyX users of Fedora Core Linux:
Recently, I offered an RPM containing the bakoma4lyx fonts, a subset
of bakoma that was made available with permission of the author. That
package is
Is there any reference or links to these bakoma4lyx fonts?
http://
Paul Johnson wrote:
Recently, Stephen Harris asked if the mathml-fonts package conflicts
or duplicates my latex-bakoma4lyx-fonts package and I decided to check
it out. I downloaded the source code for the FC Extras package
mathml-fonts that was prepared by Rex Dieter. The package is very
Stephen Harris wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I didn't follow the whole thread, but if it hadn't already been
pointed out, you used the wrong rpms. lyx and mathml-fonts are both
in Fedora Extras. Either manually downl
Peter Flynn wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
2. yum install lyx.
Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX.
Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess
that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the real tetex from
the TeX Collection
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Angus Leeming"
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
Peter Flynn is an arrogant, ignorant blowhard. I think my expression
of dissatisfaction was rather moderate. I think your moral intervention
was a day late and a dollar short and not direct
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Peter Flynn"
Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was:
1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory;
2. yum install lyx.
I just finished installing LyX
Trond SAUE wrote:
> I have seen earlier postings reporting problems with deadkeys and
> accents in lyx 1.3.5 combined with Fedora Core 3, but so far no
> solution.
Yep: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1830
-- Rex
Oscar wrote:
I'm currently using now FC3 and I thought those problems might be
related with broken qt package. So, I downloaded qt stuff from kde-
redhat.sf.net *but* still doesn't work properly. See message "problems
with acents in portuguese (latin1) in lyx 1.3.5 with fedora core 3" in
th
Johan Ingvast wrote:
I updated my qt into qt-3.3.4-0.fc3.0 (using yum install) but after that
I could not write hats at all, just like I remembered from the maillists.
Right now I am compiling the latest version from trolltech hoping that
will solve the problem.
It will solve *this* problem, but m
It's probably a qt-immodule issue. See
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1830
-- Rex
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Hi
I had this question on the users list some time ago but did not get any
response. Now I hope to get some help from here instead.
/johan
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Johan Ingvast wrote:
Hi
I
indy wrote:
> I'm using Lyx under Fedora Core 3. I have a problem with dead keys. I
> need write accents but this is not posible with my version. Example: á
> see like 'a in Lyx.
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1830
-- Rex
38 matches
Mail list logo
