double subscripts
Hello all, How can I get double sub(sup)script, like the one in attached file. One solution I tried (crude though) by taking 2x1 matrix in subscript but that takes much space. Any better solution??? Thanks in advance. Regards S. K. Tomar inline: sub1.jpg
double subscripts
Hello all, How can I get double sub(sup)script, like the one in attached file. One solution I tried (crude though) by taking 2x1 matrix in subscript but that takes much space. Any better solution??? Thanks in advance. Regards S. K. Tomar inline: sub1.jpg
double subscripts
Hello all, How can I get double sub(sup)script, like the one in attached file. One solution I tried (crude though) by taking 2x1 matrix in subscript but that takes much space. Any better solution??? Thanks in advance. Regards S. K. Tomar <>
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:24:34AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote:
I am facing one problem, when I am in mathmode, if I type
left (single) curly braces, it gives me both (left and
right) and if I try for only right one, it does nothing. Has
anyone also experienced the same and what is the solution.
Type \{ for a left, \} for a right curly brace.
Typing { gives you a nested block.
Thanks very much.
Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent
releases.
Regards
S K Tomar
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote: Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent releases. I am not sure. On the 'pro' side: It behaves exactly as LaTeX does, whence it is easy to implement. On the 'contra' side: It is somewhat annoying and people who don't know LaTeX certainly do not appreciate it. Then it should behave in a similar fashion for \(, \), \[, \] but we don't require \ before any of these, in fact if we do add, it gives error. Regards S K Tomar
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:24:34AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote:
I am facing one problem, when I am in mathmode, if I type
left (single) curly braces, it gives me both (left and
right) and if I try for only right one, it does nothing. Has
anyone also experienced the same and what is the solution.
Type \{ for a left, \} for a right curly brace.
Typing { gives you a nested block.
Thanks very much.
Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent
releases.
Regards
S K Tomar
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote: Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent releases. I am not sure. On the 'pro' side: It behaves exactly as LaTeX does, whence it is easy to implement. On the 'contra' side: It is somewhat annoying and people who don't know LaTeX certainly do not appreciate it. Then it should behave in a similar fashion for \(, \), \[, \] but we don't require \ before any of these, in fact if we do add, it gives error. Regards S K Tomar
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:24:34AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote:
> > I am facing one problem, when I am in mathmode, if I type
> > left (single) curly braces, it gives me both (left and
> > right) and if I try for only right one, it does nothing. Has
> > anyone also experienced the same and what is the solution.
>
> Type \{ for a left, \} for a right curly brace.
> Typing { gives you a nested block.
Thanks very much.
Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent
releases.
Regards
S K Tomar
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent > > releases. > > I am not sure. > > On the 'pro' side: It behaves exactly as LaTeX does, whence it is > easy to implement. > > On the 'contra' side: It is somewhat annoying and people who don't > know LaTeX certainly do not appreciate it. Then it should behave in a similar fashion for \(, \), \[, \] but we don't require "\" before any of these, in fact if we do add, it gives error. Regards S K Tomar
Re: math style (caligraphic)
Dekel Tsur wrote: You can only have uppercase letter in calligraphic font. But I have successfully used the lowercase letters in \mathcal in earlier versions, say 1.1.5/6, whereas it simply doesn't work now, no matter whether I use AMS-Math or not. S K Tomar
Re: math style (caligraphic)
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 11:11:11AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote: But I have successfully used the lowercase letters in \mathcal in earlier versions, say 1.1.5/6, whereas it simply doesn't work now, no matter whether I use AMS-Math or not. Those got converted automagically to uppercase when input. No, certainly not. I had a different output from r then what I get with R. S K Tomar
Re: math style (caligraphic)
Andre Poenitz wrote: No, certainly not. I had a different output from r then what I get with R. Oh... but both calligraphic? Do you have a screenshot? Yes, both caligraphic. Just now I did the following: Open the .ps file in xv, selected the portion and saved in .gif format. r is with superscript N and R is alone. The lower one I took from my thesis and the upper one I took from my present work. For my thesis I have taken upper ones as A,B,C,D,E,F,P,Q,V,W but the lower one was only r. Please find attached both the .gif files, which you can view in LyX also. Thanks S K Tomar
Re: math style (caligraphic)
Dekel Tsur wrote:
But I have successfully used the lowercase letters in
\mathcal in earlier versions, say 1.1.5/6, whereas it simply
doesn't work now, no matter whether I use AMS-Math or not.
No you didn't.
Just try writting $\mathcal{a}$ in TeX mode and see what happens.
Please refer to my another posting, where I have given two
different outputs, one with r and one with R. What I
have written is that, the lower one I could produce in
1.1.5/6 versions, but not now. Since I have recently
upgraded to 1.2.0, I can't reproduce that.
Thanks
S K Tomar
minibuffer
Hi, Surprisingly, I am not able to use minibuffer at all in 1.2.0. What can be the possibility and remedy??? Further, can anyone help me on how to define (1) a math macro, and (2) keybindings possibly in my personal directory. Thanks in advance S K Tomar
Re: minibuffer
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: S Thanks very much indeed. And how to come to the main window without S using mouse... Escape? Thanks, it worked. S K Tomar
Re: minibuffer
Andre Poenitz wrote: Thanks very much indeed. And how to come to the main window without using mouse... ? Just now Jean-Marc replied as ESC key and it works. Further, will there be differenct .bind file for math and text... I mean what does this math reflect here. That it contains mainly keybindigs useful for math. It was just an example. Thank you once again. S K Tomar
Re: math style (caligraphic)
Dekel Tsur wrote: You can only have uppercase letter in calligraphic font. But I have successfully used the lowercase letters in \mathcal in earlier versions, say 1.1.5/6, whereas it simply doesn't work now, no matter whether I use AMS-Math or not. S K Tomar
Re: math style (caligraphic)
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 11:11:11AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote: But I have successfully used the lowercase letters in \mathcal in earlier versions, say 1.1.5/6, whereas it simply doesn't work now, no matter whether I use AMS-Math or not. Those got converted automagically to uppercase when input. No, certainly not. I had a different output from r then what I get with R. S K Tomar
Re: math style (caligraphic)
Andre Poenitz wrote: No, certainly not. I had a different output from r then what I get with R. Oh... but both calligraphic? Do you have a screenshot? Yes, both caligraphic. Just now I did the following: Open the .ps file in xv, selected the portion and saved in .gif format. r is with superscript N and R is alone. The lower one I took from my thesis and the upper one I took from my present work. For my thesis I have taken upper ones as A,B,C,D,E,F,P,Q,V,W but the lower one was only r. Please find attached both the .gif files, which you can view in LyX also. Thanks S K Tomar
Re: math style (caligraphic)
Dekel Tsur wrote:
But I have successfully used the lowercase letters in
\mathcal in earlier versions, say 1.1.5/6, whereas it simply
doesn't work now, no matter whether I use AMS-Math or not.
No you didn't.
Just try writting $\mathcal{a}$ in TeX mode and see what happens.
Please refer to my another posting, where I have given two
different outputs, one with r and one with R. What I
have written is that, the lower one I could produce in
1.1.5/6 versions, but not now. Since I have recently
upgraded to 1.2.0, I can't reproduce that.
Thanks
S K Tomar
minibuffer
Hi, Surprisingly, I am not able to use minibuffer at all in 1.2.0. What can be the possibility and remedy??? Further, can anyone help me on how to define (1) a math macro, and (2) keybindings possibly in my personal directory. Thanks in advance S K Tomar
Re: minibuffer
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: S Thanks very much indeed. And how to come to the main window without S using mouse... Escape? Thanks, it worked. S K Tomar
Re: minibuffer
Andre Poenitz wrote: Thanks very much indeed. And how to come to the main window without using mouse... ? Just now Jean-Marc replied as ESC key and it works. Further, will there be differenct .bind file for math and text... I mean what does this math reflect here. That it contains mainly keybindigs useful for math. It was just an example. Thank you once again. S K Tomar
Re: math style (caligraphic)
Dekel Tsur wrote: > You can only have uppercase letter in calligraphic font. But I have successfully used the lowercase letters in \mathcal in earlier versions, say 1.1.5/6, whereas it simply doesn't work now, no matter whether I use AMS-Math or not. S K Tomar
Re: math style (caligraphic)
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 11:11:11AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote: > > But I have successfully used the lowercase letters in > > \mathcal in earlier versions, say 1.1.5/6, whereas it simply > > doesn't work now, no matter whether I use AMS-Math or not. > > Those got converted automagically to uppercase when input. No, certainly not. I had a different output from "r" then what I get with "R". S K Tomar
Re: math style (caligraphic)
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > No, certainly not. I had a different output from "r" then > > what I get with "R". > > Oh... but both "calligraphic"? > > Do you have a screenshot? Yes, both "caligraphic". Just now I did the following: Open the .ps file in xv, selected the portion and saved in .gif format. "r" is with superscript "N" and "R" is alone. The lower one I took from my thesis and the upper one I took from my present work. For my thesis I have taken upper ones as A,B,C,D,E,F,P,Q,V,W but the lower one was only r. Please find attached both the .gif files, which you can view in LyX also. Thanks S K Tomar
Re: math style (caligraphic)
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > But I have successfully used the lowercase letters in
> > \mathcal in earlier versions, say 1.1.5/6, whereas it simply
> > doesn't work now, no matter whether I use AMS-Math or not.
>
> No you didn't.
> Just try writting $\mathcal{a}$ in TeX mode and see what happens.
Please refer to my another posting, where I have given two
different outputs, one with "r" and one with "R". What I
have written is that, the lower one I could produce in
1.1.5/6 versions, but not now. Since I have recently
upgraded to 1.2.0, I can't reproduce that.
Thanks
S K Tomar
minibuffer
Hi, Surprisingly, I am not able to use minibuffer at all in 1.2.0. What can be the possibility and remedy??? Further, can anyone help me on how to define (1) a math macro, and (2) keybindings possibly in my personal directory. Thanks in advance S K Tomar
Re: minibuffer
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > S> Thanks very much indeed. And how to come to the main window without > S> using mouse... > > Escape? Thanks, it worked. S K Tomar
Re: minibuffer
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Thanks very much indeed. And how to come to the main window > without using mouse... > > ? Just now Jean-Marc replied as ESC key and it works. > > Further, will there be differenct .bind file for math and text... I > > mean what does this "math" reflect here. > > That it contains mainly keybindigs useful for math. It was just an example. Thank you once again. S K Tomar
