Re: bug? powerdot problems with 2.0 beta 3

2011-03-07 Thread Sam Madhani
I can also replicate this problem on windows with the latest texlive and lyx 
2beta4, but when the class option 'nopsheader' is removed, it compiles as 
expected with pd2pdf.

- Original Message -
From: moabi2000
Sent: 03/07/11 10:53 AM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: bug? powerdot problems with 2.0 beta 3

 Hi, Using 2.0 beta 3 the powerdot example file fails to compile properly. 
Using ps2pdf, the orientation of the slides is wrong and they are truncated 
(attached pdf). Using dvipdfm the orientation is correct, but the style 
(background colours) do not show up (attached pdf). I found reference to these 
problems in this thread: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg76826.html but no sign 
that it was resolved. I have tried several variants of paper=screen etc I am 
running Fedora 14. I tried the same file under a default install of 1.6.9 under 
suse 11.4 and in this case: - ps2pdf works great - dvipdfm does not show sound 
colours What might be the problem? Thanks for your help M.


Re: bug? powerdot problems with 2.0 beta 3

2011-03-07 Thread Sam Madhani
I can also replicate this problem on windows with the latest texlive and lyx 
2beta4, but when the class option 'nopsheader' is removed, it compiles as 
expected with pd2pdf.

- Original Message -
From: moabi2000
Sent: 03/07/11 10:53 AM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: bug? powerdot problems with 2.0 beta 3

 Hi, Using 2.0 beta 3 the powerdot example file fails to compile properly. 
Using ps2pdf, the orientation of the slides is wrong and they are truncated 
(attached pdf). Using dvipdfm the orientation is correct, but the style 
(background colours) do not show up (attached pdf). I found reference to these 
problems in this thread: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg76826.html but no sign 
that it was resolved. I have tried several variants of paper=screen etc I am 
running Fedora 14. I tried the same file under a default install of 1.6.9 under 
suse 11.4 and in this case: - ps2pdf works great - dvipdfm does not show sound 
colours What might be the problem? Thanks for your help M.


Re: bug? powerdot problems with 2.0 beta 3

2011-03-07 Thread Sam Madhani
I can also replicate this problem on windows with the latest texlive and lyx 
2beta4, but when the class option 'nopsheader' is removed, it compiles as 
expected with pd2pdf.

- Original Message -
From: moabi2000
Sent: 03/07/11 10:53 AM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: bug? powerdot problems with 2.0 beta 3

 Hi, Using 2.0 beta 3 the powerdot example file fails to compile properly. 
Using ps2pdf, the orientation of the slides is wrong and they are truncated 
(attached pdf). Using dvipdfm the orientation is correct, but the style 
(background colours) do not show up (attached pdf). I found reference to these 
problems in this thread: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg76826.html but no sign 
that it was resolved. I have tried several variants of paper=screen etc I am 
running Fedora 14. I tried the same file under a default install of 1.6.9 under 
suse 11.4 and in this case: - ps2pdf works great - dvipdfm does not show sound 
colours What might be the problem? Thanks for your help M.


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-03 Thread Sam Madhani
Not sure with SVN, but with lyx 2b1 release lyz works almost fine. The only 
problem I had was that the latest lyz cannot create a bibtex record by itself, 
but that seems more like a lyz/firefox related problem. If I touch a .bib file 
manually, then lyz can port citations perfectly.


- Original Message -
From: Jose Quesada
Sent: 12/03/10 07:37 PM
To: sa...@lyx.org, lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

Thanks Pavel,
So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)




Regards,
Sam Madhani


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-03 Thread Sam Madhani
Not sure with SVN, but with lyx 2b1 release lyz works almost fine. The only 
problem I had was that the latest lyz cannot create a bibtex record by itself, 
but that seems more like a lyz/firefox related problem. If I touch a .bib file 
manually, then lyz can port citations perfectly.


- Original Message -
From: Jose Quesada
Sent: 12/03/10 07:37 PM
To: sa...@lyx.org, lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

Thanks Pavel,
So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)




Regards,
Sam Madhani


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-03 Thread Sam Madhani
Not sure with SVN, but with lyx 2b1 release lyz works almost fine. The only 
problem I had was that the latest lyz cannot create a bibtex record by itself, 
but that seems more like a lyz/firefox related problem. If I touch a .bib file 
manually, then lyz can port citations perfectly.


- Original Message -
From: Jose Quesada
Sent: 12/03/10 07:37 PM
To: sa...@lyx.org, lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

Thanks Pavel,
So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)




Regards,
Sam Madhani