Re: compiling LyX for maemo (arm architecture)

2009-11-04 Thread Stacia Hartleben
...@lyx.org wrote: Stacia Hartleben baka...@gmail.com writes: I don't know the first thing about compiling on OS 2008 (Maemo) for Nokia internet tablets. The architecture is armel - do I need to put any special flags in while compiling? I have a dev environment set up and I think I have all

Re: compiling LyX for maemo (arm architecture)

2009-11-04 Thread Stacia Hartleben
...@lyx.org wrote: Stacia Hartleben baka...@gmail.com writes: I don't know the first thing about compiling on OS 2008 (Maemo) for Nokia internet tablets. The architecture is armel - do I need to put any special flags in while compiling? I have a dev environment set up and I think I have all

Re: compiling LyX for maemo (arm architecture)

2009-11-04 Thread Stacia Hartleben
out...@lyx.org> wrote: > Stacia Hartleben <baka...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I don't know the first thing about compiling on OS 2008 (Maemo) for >> Nokia internet tablets. The architecture is armel - do I need to put >> any special flags in while compiling? I have a dev

compiling LyX for maemo (arm architecture)

2009-10-23 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I don't know the first thing about compiling on OS 2008 (Maemo) for Nokia internet tablets. The architecture is armel - do I need to put any special flags in while compiling? I have a dev environment set up and I think I have all the dependencies (QT libs, etc) I have an error as described here:

compiling LyX for maemo (arm architecture)

2009-10-23 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I don't know the first thing about compiling on OS 2008 (Maemo) for Nokia internet tablets. The architecture is armel - do I need to put any special flags in while compiling? I have a dev environment set up and I think I have all the dependencies (QT libs, etc) I have an error as described here:

compiling LyX for maemo (arm architecture)

2009-10-23 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I don't know the first thing about compiling on OS 2008 (Maemo) for Nokia internet tablets. The architecture is armel - do I need to put any special flags in while compiling? I have a dev environment set up and I think I have all the dependencies (QT libs, etc) I have an error as described here:

aspell on ubuntu with LyX

2008-01-29 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hey guys, I am running into difficulty getting aspell working under Xubuntu. I installed it but the spellcheck button is always grayed out...is there some sort of setting I can turn on to get it working? I couldn't find anything on the Wiki.

aspell on ubuntu with LyX

2008-01-29 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hey guys, I am running into difficulty getting aspell working under Xubuntu. I installed it but the spellcheck button is always grayed out...is there some sort of setting I can turn on to get it working? I couldn't find anything on the Wiki.

aspell on ubuntu with LyX

2008-01-29 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hey guys, I am running into difficulty getting aspell working under Xubuntu. I installed it but the spellcheck button is always grayed out...is there some sort of setting I can turn on to get it working? I couldn't find anything on the Wiki.

help with LyX-Code (or verbatim in ERT) and wrapping

2007-12-16 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi guys. I am finishing up a paper for my algorithms class and I ran into a little snag when it comes to displaying code and wrapping. 1. Sometimes very long lines are simply cut off (!) Take for example this long output of a sorting algorithm: (100 100 100 98 96 95 95 92 91 91

help with LyX-Code (or verbatim in ERT) and wrapping

2007-12-16 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi guys. I am finishing up a paper for my algorithms class and I ran into a little snag when it comes to displaying code and wrapping. 1. Sometimes very long lines are simply cut off (!) Take for example this long output of a sorting algorithm: (100 100 100 98 96 95 95 92 91 91

help with LyX-Code (or verbatim in ERT) and wrapping

2007-12-16 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi guys. I am finishing up a paper for my algorithms class and I ran into a little snag when it comes to displaying code and wrapping. 1. Sometimes very long lines are simply cut off (!) Take for example this long output of a sorting algorithm: (100 100 100 98 96 95 95 92 91 91

subscript in superscript

2007-10-23 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi guys, this is a really simple question and I'm probably just missing something, but I can't get subscripts to work within superscripts. I want to write N^log_b(a) but the underscore always shows up no matter what I do. Tips?

subscript in superscript

2007-10-23 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi guys, this is a really simple question and I'm probably just missing something, but I can't get subscripts to work within superscripts. I want to write N^log_b(a) but the underscore always shows up no matter what I do. Tips?

subscript in superscript

2007-10-23 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi guys, this is a really simple question and I'm probably just missing something, but I can't get subscripts to work within superscripts. I want to write N^log_b(a) but the underscore always shows up no matter what I do. Tips?

Re: On the fly spellcheck?

2007-08-11 Thread Stacia Hartleben
This has been on bugzilla for some time - cast your vote for implementation :) http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718 On 8/11/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, for what it's worth, I'm a humanist, and so is JMarc, one of the

Re: On the fly spellcheck?

2007-08-11 Thread Stacia Hartleben
This has been on bugzilla for some time - cast your vote for implementation :) http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718 On 8/11/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, for what it's worth, I'm a humanist, and so is JMarc, one of the

Re: On the fly spellcheck?

2007-08-11 Thread Stacia Hartleben
This has been on bugzilla for some time - cast your vote for implementation :) http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718 On 8/11/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Well, for what it's worth, I'm a humanist, and so is JMarc, one

Unicode with CJK wiki added

2007-08-09 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi everyone, I updated the Unicode wiki (http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Unicode) with CJK info for my own benefit as much as everyone else's :) It's kind of a complex process, and when I got my own computer I forgot how I set it up...well now I'll never forget :) Feel free to work on it (I wasn't really

Unicode with CJK wiki added

2007-08-09 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi everyone, I updated the Unicode wiki (http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Unicode) with CJK info for my own benefit as much as everyone else's :) It's kind of a complex process, and when I got my own computer I forgot how I set it up...well now I'll never forget :) Feel free to work on it (I wasn't really

Unicode with CJK wiki added

2007-08-09 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi everyone, I updated the Unicode wiki (http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Unicode) with CJK info for my own benefit as much as everyone else's :) It's kind of a complex process, and when I got my own computer I forgot how I set it up...well now I'll never forget :) Feel free to work on it (I wasn't really

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-26 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I posted a new bug here: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3511 On 4/26/07, Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maria Gouskova wrote: You see how non-obvious this is--it didn't even occur to me that TIPA had to be loaded in order to use Unicode, but I suppose it makes sense since

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-26 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I posted a new bug here: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3511 On 4/26/07, Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maria Gouskova wrote: You see how non-obvious this is--it didn't even occur to me that TIPA had to be loaded in order to use Unicode, but I suppose it makes sense since

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-26 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I posted a new bug here: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3511 On 4/26/07, Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Maria Gouskova wrote: > You see how non-obvious this is--it didn't even occur to me that TIPA > had to be loaded in order to use Unicode, but I suppose it makes sense > since

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I know this is an old mail, but I am bringing it back up because it reminds me of the Devanagari package. I'm trying to get CJK working on my own using your instructions, Marc, and I can't get it to work, I just get tons of errors. Could you include a test file that I can look at? Also this

CJK seems to be FULLY working in 1.5.0 (as far as I can tell)

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
the \begin{CJK} thing (or the equiv in Devnag) to be more transparent.. On 4/25/07, Marc Flerackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hi, I know this is an old mail, but I am bringing it back up because it reminds me of the Devanagari package. I'm trying to get CJK working on my

Re: CJK seems to be FULLY working in 1.5.0 (as far as I can tell)

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Okay, but does that work for mixed text documents? I rarely if ever have to write full documents in CJK... On 4/25/07, Marc Flerackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hi, I installed the IPAM font as referenced on that site, and now it works fine in LyX, no crashes

Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I downloaded the latest Unicode symbols file to play with Devanagari encodings...I'm having trouble though. I can't get many of the characters in there to work - even ones that were already inputted (the TIPA ones)...for example the glottal stop, upsideown m, etc...I can get some of the

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
somewhere. On 4/25/07, Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I downloaded the latest Unicode symbols file to play with Devanagari encodings...I'm having trouble though. I can't get many of the characters in there to work - even ones that were already inputted (the TIPA ones)...for example

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hi, I downloaded the latest Unicode symbols file to play with Devanagari encodings...I'm having trouble though. I can't get many of the characters in there to work - even ones that were already inputted (the TIPA ones)...for example the glottal stop

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
problem here (Intel Mac, 10.4.9). File attached. When Lg Encoding is set to utf8, I get a Package inputenc error. When Lg Encoding is set to default, I get error closing output file... Please change to utf8. The only IPA character in the file is a schwa (ə). Maria On 4/25/07, Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
symbols with LyX 1.5.x, preferably here (it's empty as of right now): http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Unicode Maria On 4/25/07, Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can also confirm it with this file, thanks for the example - glad I'm not just being crazy over here at this end. You didn't place

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I know this is an old mail, but I am bringing it back up because it reminds me of the Devanagari package. I'm trying to get CJK working on my own using your instructions, Marc, and I can't get it to work, I just get tons of errors. Could you include a test file that I can look at? Also this

CJK seems to be FULLY working in 1.5.0 (as far as I can tell)

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
the \begin{CJK} thing (or the equiv in Devnag) to be more transparent.. On 4/25/07, Marc Flerackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hi, I know this is an old mail, but I am bringing it back up because it reminds me of the Devanagari package. I'm trying to get CJK working on my

Re: CJK seems to be FULLY working in 1.5.0 (as far as I can tell)

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Okay, but does that work for mixed text documents? I rarely if ever have to write full documents in CJK... On 4/25/07, Marc Flerackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hi, I installed the IPAM font as referenced on that site, and now it works fine in LyX, no crashes

Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I downloaded the latest Unicode symbols file to play with Devanagari encodings...I'm having trouble though. I can't get many of the characters in there to work - even ones that were already inputted (the TIPA ones)...for example the glottal stop, upsideown m, etc...I can get some of the

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
somewhere. On 4/25/07, Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I downloaded the latest Unicode symbols file to play with Devanagari encodings...I'm having trouble though. I can't get many of the characters in there to work - even ones that were already inputted (the TIPA ones)...for example

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hi, I downloaded the latest Unicode symbols file to play with Devanagari encodings...I'm having trouble though. I can't get many of the characters in there to work - even ones that were already inputted (the TIPA ones)...for example the glottal stop

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
problem here (Intel Mac, 10.4.9). File attached. When Lg Encoding is set to utf8, I get a Package inputenc error. When Lg Encoding is set to default, I get error closing output file... Please change to utf8. The only IPA character in the file is a schwa (ə). Maria On 4/25/07, Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
symbols with LyX 1.5.x, preferably here (it's empty as of right now): http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Unicode Maria On 4/25/07, Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can also confirm it with this file, thanks for the example - glad I'm not just being crazy over here at this end. You didn't place

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I know this is an old mail, but I am bringing it back up because it reminds me of the Devanagari package. I'm trying to get CJK working on my own using your instructions, Marc, and I can't get it to work, I just get tons of errors. Could you include a test file that I can look at? Also this

CJK seems to be FULLY working in 1.5.0 (as far as I can tell)

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
the \begin{CJK} thing (or the equiv in Devnag) to be more transparent.. On 4/25/07, Marc Flerackers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: > Hi, I know this is an old mail, but I am bringing it back up because > it reminds me of the Devanagari package. I'm trying to get

Re: CJK seems to be FULLY working in 1.5.0 (as far as I can tell)

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Okay, but does that work for mixed text documents? I rarely if ever have to write full documents in CJK... On 4/25/07, Marc Flerackers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: > Hi, I installed the IPAM font as referenced on that site, and now it > works fine in LyX

Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I downloaded the latest Unicode symbols file to play with Devanagari encodings...I'm having trouble though. I can't get many of the characters in there to work - even ones that were already inputted (the TIPA ones)...for example the glottal stop, upsideown m, etc...I can get some of the

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
somewhere. On 4/25/07, Stacia Hartleben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I downloaded the latest Unicode symbols file to play with Devanagari encodings...I'm having trouble though. I can't get many of the characters in there to work - even ones that were already inputted (the TIPA ones)...for e

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
um <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: > Hi, I downloaded the latest Unicode symbols file to play with > Devanagari encodings...I'm having trouble though. I can't get many of > the characters in there to work - even ones that were already inputted > (the TIPA one

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
it would turn up here, since it pretty much renders the > Unicodesymbols file useless. > > On 4/25/07, Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Stacia Hartleben wrote: > > > > > Hi, I downloaded the latest Unicode symbols file to play with > > > De

Re: Help using Unicodesymbols file

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
e the less familiar/common Unicode symbols with LyX 1.5.x, preferably here (it's empty as of right now): http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Unicode Maria On 4/25/07, Stacia Hartleben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can also confirm it with this file, thanks for the example - glad I'm > not just

Re: help adding Devanagari unicode symbols? + CJK and TIPA similarities?

2007-04-24 Thread Stacia Hartleben
in there once that I couldn't find! And no, it wasn't the labiodental flap.) On 4/24/07, Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: So the combining character feature wouldn't help with Devanagari? Yes, I don't think so, since you wrote that several characters need to be put

Re: help adding Devanagari unicode symbols? + CJK and TIPA similarities?

2007-04-24 Thread Stacia Hartleben
in there once that I couldn't find! And no, it wasn't the labiodental flap.) On 4/24/07, Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: So the combining character feature wouldn't help with Devanagari? Yes, I don't think so, since you wrote that several characters need to be put

Re: help adding Devanagari unicode symbols? + CJK and TIPA similarities?

2007-04-24 Thread Stacia Hartleben
h I needed a symbol in there once that I couldn't find! And no, it wasn't the labiodental flap.) On 4/24/07, Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: > So the combining character feature wouldn't help with Devanagari? Yes, I don't think so, since you wrote that seve

Re: help adding Devanagari unicode symbols?

2007-04-23 Thread Stacia Hartleben
). I'd be willing to take a shot at TIPA as well once I have time but this little problem makes things difficult...It may be that LyX will have to code in new support, I don't know... On 4/23/07, Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: I was looking at a previous mail

Re: help adding Devanagari unicode symbols?

2007-04-23 Thread Stacia Hartleben
So the combining character feature wouldn't help with Devanagari? On 4/23/07, Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Doesn't this also mean that it will not work for TIPA? A previous mail seemed promising but actually not all of TIPA is a one-to-one - Unicode encodes

Re: help adding Devanagari unicode symbols?

2007-04-23 Thread Stacia Hartleben
). I'd be willing to take a shot at TIPA as well once I have time but this little problem makes things difficult...It may be that LyX will have to code in new support, I don't know... On 4/23/07, Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: I was looking at a previous mail

Re: help adding Devanagari unicode symbols?

2007-04-23 Thread Stacia Hartleben
So the combining character feature wouldn't help with Devanagari? On 4/23/07, Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Doesn't this also mean that it will not work for TIPA? A previous mail seemed promising but actually not all of TIPA is a one-to-one - Unicode encodes

Re: help adding Devanagari unicode symbols?

2007-04-23 Thread Stacia Hartleben
c{c} makes a Cedilla). I'd be willing to take a shot at TIPA as well once I have time but this little problem makes things difficult...It may be that LyX will have to code in new support, I don't know... On 4/23/07, Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: > I was looking

Re: help adding Devanagari unicode symbols?

2007-04-23 Thread Stacia Hartleben
So the combining character feature wouldn't help with Devanagari? On 4/23/07, Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: > Doesn't this also mean that it will not work for TIPA? A previous mail > seemed promising but actually not all of TIPA is a one-to-one

help adding Devanagari unicode symbols?

2007-04-21 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I was looking at a previous mail that said you could edit a file to put in Tipa codes...this got me thinking that perhaps I could do the same for the Devanagari package. However IPA and Devanagari are reallly different. A big problem especially is the i vowel which appears *before* the

help adding Devanagari unicode symbols?

2007-04-21 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I was looking at a previous mail that said you could edit a file to put in Tipa codes...this got me thinking that perhaps I could do the same for the Devanagari package. However IPA and Devanagari are reallly different. A big problem especially is the i vowel which appears *before* the

help adding Devanagari unicode symbols?

2007-04-21 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I was looking at a previous mail that said you could edit a file to put in Tipa codes...this got me thinking that perhaps I could do the same for the Devanagari package. However IPA and Devanagari are reallly different. A big problem especially is the "i" vowel which appears *before* the

ongoing numbered list?

2007-04-14 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Sorry about the confusing title of this mail but I don't know how to sum it up better. Say I have a document like this: 1. A b c 2. e f g some text 1. more text 2. and more text How could I make it look like this: 1. A b c 2. e f g some text 3. more text 4. and more text Where each time

Re: ongoing numbered list?

2007-04-14 Thread Stacia Hartleben
around a bit in te archives, or refer to this site: http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=interruptlist Hope this helps :-), Christian Stacia Hartleben wrote: Sorry about the confusing title of this mail but I don't know how to sum it up better. Say I have a document like this: 1

Re: ongoing numbered list?

2007-04-14 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Well I may have several sections, subsections, and subsub sections as well as all sorts of other stuff inbetween... On 4/15/07, David L. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Sorry about the confusing title of this mail but I don't know how to sum it up better. Say I have

ongoing numbered list?

2007-04-14 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Sorry about the confusing title of this mail but I don't know how to sum it up better. Say I have a document like this: 1. A b c 2. e f g some text 1. more text 2. and more text How could I make it look like this: 1. A b c 2. e f g some text 3. more text 4. and more text Where each time

Re: ongoing numbered list?

2007-04-14 Thread Stacia Hartleben
around a bit in te archives, or refer to this site: http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=interruptlist Hope this helps :-), Christian Stacia Hartleben wrote: Sorry about the confusing title of this mail but I don't know how to sum it up better. Say I have a document like this: 1

Re: ongoing numbered list?

2007-04-14 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Well I may have several sections, subsections, and subsub sections as well as all sorts of other stuff inbetween... On 4/15/07, David L. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: Sorry about the confusing title of this mail but I don't know how to sum it up better. Say I have

ongoing numbered list?

2007-04-14 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Sorry about the confusing title of this mail but I don't know how to sum it up better. Say I have a document like this: 1. A b c 2. e f g some text 1. more text 2. and more text How could I make it look like this: 1. A b c 2. e f g some text 3. more text 4. and more text Where each time

Re: ongoing numbered list?

2007-04-14 Thread Stacia Hartleben
y want to look around a bit in te archives, or refer to this site: http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=interruptlist Hope this helps :-), Christian Stacia Hartleben wrote: > Sorry about the confusing title of this mail but I don't know how to > sum it up better. Say I have a d

Re: ongoing numbered list?

2007-04-14 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Well I may have several sections, subsections, and subsub sections as well as all sorts of other stuff inbetween... On 4/15/07, David L. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stacia Hartleben wrote: > Sorry about the confusing title of this mail but I don't know how to > sum it up b

Jabref Meta comments showing up in my citation list (1.4.4)

2007-04-10 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I don't know if this is fixed in 1.5.0, but I've always been annoyed that the JabReb meta comments show up in the citation box...Does this only happen to me or does it happen to other people as well, and does anyone know the status of it? If not I'm gonna bug it on bugzilla.

Jabref Meta comments showing up in my citation list (1.4.4)

2007-04-10 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I don't know if this is fixed in 1.5.0, but I've always been annoyed that the JabReb meta comments show up in the citation box...Does this only happen to me or does it happen to other people as well, and does anyone know the status of it? If not I'm gonna bug it on bugzilla.

Jabref Meta comments showing up in my citation list (1.4.4)

2007-04-10 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I don't know if this is fixed in 1.5.0, but I've always been annoyed that the JabReb meta comments show up in the citation box...Does this only happen to me or does it happen to other people as well, and does anyone know the status of it? If not I'm gonna bug it on bugzilla.

a little help with enumerate

2007-04-08 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I had a quick question about enumerate. I saw a paper where it was used like this: 1. (a) one (b) two (c) three The only way I can see to do it in LyX is to make it have something like: 1. (a) one (b) two (c) three where the 1. is on a blank line looking weird. Any ideas on

Re: a little help with enumerate

2007-04-08 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Awesome! Quick and easy and not too hackish! Any chance we'll get this without the hack in LyX 1.5.0? Doesn't seem like it would be that hard to implement. On 4/9/07, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 8, 2007, at 10:41 PM, Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hi, I had a quick question about

a little help with enumerate

2007-04-08 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I had a quick question about enumerate. I saw a paper where it was used like this: 1. (a) one (b) two (c) three The only way I can see to do it in LyX is to make it have something like: 1. (a) one (b) two (c) three where the 1. is on a blank line looking weird. Any ideas on

Re: a little help with enumerate

2007-04-08 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Awesome! Quick and easy and not too hackish! Any chance we'll get this without the hack in LyX 1.5.0? Doesn't seem like it would be that hard to implement. On 4/9/07, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 8, 2007, at 10:41 PM, Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hi, I had a quick question about

a little help with enumerate

2007-04-08 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I had a quick question about enumerate. I saw a paper where it was used like this: 1. (a) one (b) two (c) three The only way I can see to do it in LyX is to make it have something like: 1. (a) one (b) two (c) three where the 1. is on a blank line looking weird. Any ideas on

Re: a little help with enumerate

2007-04-08 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Awesome! Quick and easy and not too hackish! Any chance we'll get this without the hack in LyX 1.5.0? Doesn't seem like it would be that hard to implement. On 4/9/07, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Apr 8, 2007, at 10:41 PM, Stacia Hartleben wrote: > Hi, I had a quick quest

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-03-30 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Let me know how you progress and maybe post this on http://bugzilla.lyx.org . That would be amazing if CJK was working...maybe support for the CJK package could be added so you don't have to put something around every character. On 3/30/07, Marc Flerackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When setting

fiddly little figures

2007-03-30 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi guys. I've never done a paper with figures before so I'm slowly figuring things out. Figures seem to like to go on the top of the page, above any text. I guess this is if you want to intersperse the figures throughout the paper, which I don't want to do. Okay fine, so I put them all at the

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-03-30 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Let me know how you progress and maybe post this on http://bugzilla.lyx.org . That would be amazing if CJK was working...maybe support for the CJK package could be added so you don't have to put something around every character. On 3/30/07, Marc Flerackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When setting

fiddly little figures

2007-03-30 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi guys. I've never done a paper with figures before so I'm slowly figuring things out. Figures seem to like to go on the top of the page, above any text. I guess this is if you want to intersperse the figures throughout the paper, which I don't want to do. Okay fine, so I put them all at the

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-03-30 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Let me know how you progress and maybe post this on http://bugzilla.lyx.org . That would be amazing if CJK was working...maybe support for the CJK package could be added so you don't have to put something around every character. On 3/30/07, Marc Flerackers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When

fiddly little figures

2007-03-30 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi guys. I've never done a paper with figures before so I'm slowly figuring things out. Figures seem to like to go on the top of the page, above any text. I guess this is if you want to intersperse the figures throughout the paper, which I don't want to do. Okay fine, so I put them all at the

Can't use 1.5.0 for CJK right?

2007-03-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi everyone. I am going to be writing a paper which will probably need some CJK characters in it. I have the problem which is discussed in the following bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 I'm not sure what's been done since then or if there's been an update which will

having problems with a bibtex file made with jabref and plain lyx settings

2007-03-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I'm attaching two files which cause some weird errors for me: Paragraph ended before org@@citex was complete. Begin quote on line 44 ended by end document. It looks like a bracket is misplaced, but I haven't done anything dodgy, just normally used Jabref and LyX (although I did put the

Can't use 1.5.0 for CJK right?

2007-03-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi everyone. I am going to be writing a paper which will probably need some CJK characters in it. I have the problem which is discussed in the following bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 I'm not sure what's been done since then or if there's been an update which will

having problems with a bibtex file made with jabref and plain lyx settings

2007-03-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I'm attaching two files which cause some weird errors for me: Paragraph ended before org@@citex was complete. Begin quote on line 44 ended by end document. It looks like a bracket is misplaced, but I haven't done anything dodgy, just normally used Jabref and LyX (although I did put the

Can't use 1.5.0 for CJK right?

2007-03-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi everyone. I am going to be writing a paper which will probably need some CJK characters in it. I have the problem which is discussed in the following bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 I'm not sure what's been done since then or if there's been an update which will

having problems with a bibtex file made with jabref and plain lyx settings

2007-03-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I'm attaching two files which cause some weird errors for me: Paragraph ended before org@@citex was complete. Begin quote on line 44 ended by end document. It looks like a bracket is misplaced, but I haven't done anything dodgy, just normally used Jabref and LyX (although I did put the

character styles in LyX 1.5.0?

2007-01-07 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I had a question about character styles in LyX 1.5.0. In 1.4.x, they were implemented as a bit of a hack through the command buffer. I remember being really excited about this feature (as I use a lot of ERT for things in different scripts) but I never ended up using it because of the clunky

character styles in LyX 1.5.0?

2007-01-07 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I had a question about character styles in LyX 1.5.0. In 1.4.x, they were implemented as a bit of a hack through the command buffer. I remember being really excited about this feature (as I use a lot of ERT for things in different scripts) but I never ended up using it because of the clunky

character styles in LyX 1.5.0?

2007-01-07 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I had a question about character styles in LyX 1.5.0. In 1.4.x, they were implemented as a bit of a hack through the command buffer. I remember being really excited about this feature (as I use a lot of ERT for things in different scripts) but I never ended up using it because of the clunky

Re: tutorial on unicode for 1.5.0 svn?

2006-12-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi everyone thanks for your replies. It seems that I have misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask in all honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the point of going through all this trouble to make LyX unicode compatible if it well, doesn't work with the majority of

Re: tutorial on unicode for 1.5.0 svn?

2006-12-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia == Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stacia Hi everyone thanks for your replies. It seems that I have Stacia misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask Stacia in all honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the Stacia point of going through all

Re: tutorial on unicode for 1.5.0 svn?

2006-12-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi everyone thanks for your replies. It seems that I have misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask in all honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the point of going through all this trouble to make LyX unicode compatible if it well, doesn't work with the majority of

Re: tutorial on unicode for 1.5.0 svn?

2006-12-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
PROTECTED] wrote: Stacia == Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stacia Hi everyone thanks for your replies. It seems that I have Stacia misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask Stacia in all honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the Stacia point of going through all

Re: tutorial on unicode for 1.5.0 svn?

2006-12-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi everyone thanks for your replies. It seems that I have misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask in all honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the point of going through all this trouble to make LyX unicode compatible if it well, doesn't work with the majority of

Re: tutorial on unicode for 1.5.0 svn?

2006-12-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> "Stacia" == Stacia Hartleben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stacia> Hi everyone thanks for your replies. It seems that I have Stacia> misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask Stacia> in all honesty and

tutorial on unicode for 1.5.0 svn?

2006-12-26 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I addressed this in another mail but no one seemed to answer and I can't really find any posts about how exactly to use this great new feature in 1.5.0. I'd like to use it for my Sanskrit assignment if I can to test it out. I've tried it with both Sanskrit text and Japanese, and both of them

  1   2   3   4   >