Re: Reference Order and figure position problems
I had the same problem. It would be very helpful if you could tell me how to change from _alphabetically_ sorted to unsrt style. Thank you Jürgen Spitzmüller-2 wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) When the document is viewed in pdf, all my references in the main body of text are in the wrong order. The first reference stated comes up as [145] and not [1], while the second is [76], not [2]. This occurs throughout the entire document, in a nons equential psuedo random manner! The numbers refer to an _alphabetically_ sorted bibliography, not to the order of appearance in the text, unless you are using an unsrt style. Jürgen -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Reference-Order-and-figure-position-problems-tp15401589p18406327.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Reference Order and figure position problems
I had the same problem. It would be very helpful if you could tell me how to change from _alphabetically_ sorted to unsrt style. Thank you Jürgen Spitzmüller-2 wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) When the document is viewed in pdf, all my references in the main body of text are in the wrong order. The first reference stated comes up as [145] and not [1], while the second is [76], not [2]. This occurs throughout the entire document, in a nons equential psuedo random manner! The numbers refer to an _alphabetically_ sorted bibliography, not to the order of appearance in the text, unless you are using an unsrt style. Jürgen -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Reference-Order-and-figure-position-problems-tp15401589p18406327.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Reference Order and figure position problems
I had the same problem. It would be very helpful if you could tell me how to change from _alphabetically_ sorted to unsrt style. Thank you Jürgen Spitzmüller-2 wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> 1) When the document is viewed in pdf, all my references in the main >> body of text are in the wrong order. The first reference stated comes >> up as [145] and not [1], while the second is [76], not [2]. This >> occurs throughout the entire document, in a nons equential psuedo >> random manner! > > The numbers refer to an _alphabetically_ sorted bibliography, not to the > order > of appearance in the text, unless you are using an unsrt style. > > Jürgen > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Reference-Order-and-figure-position-problems-tp15401589p18406327.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
