Re: \includeonly on 1.6.2?

2009-05-04 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 01:26:49PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> 
> Are you sure the manual mentions \includeonly (as opposed to \include)?

Yes.  It turns out bug 5360 made this point, just not very
prominently.  I added a clarification there.
 
> The wiki can be fixed by everyone, click the Edit button/link.

Done. 

Thanks!

A
-- 
Andrew Sullivan
a...@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.


Re: \includeonly on 1.6.2?

2009-05-04 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-05-03, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 07:56:59PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:

>> \includeonly is currently not supported. 

> Aha.  I think this needs to be fixed in the wiki, then.  Not to
> mention the manual :) How do I go about that?

Are you sure the manual mentions \includeonly (as opposed to \include)?

The wiki can be fixed by everyone, click the Edit button/link.

For the manual, you can write to the documentation list or file a bug report
via trac.

Günter



Re: \includeonly on 1.6.2?

2009-05-03 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 07:56:59PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:

> \includeonly is currently not supported. 

Aha.  I think this needs to be fixed in the wiki, then.  Not to
mention the manual :) How do I go about that?


-- 
Andrew Sullivan
a...@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.


Re: \includeonly on 1.6.2?

2009-05-03 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-05-03, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> When I use \includeonly with multiple files. I get the correct ToC and
> such at the beginning of the output, but the included file doesn't
> ever show up.  I'm sure I've missed something in the documentation,
> but I've looked through it several times & can't see what I've done
> wrong.  (I've tried absolute paths, relative paths, &c, all without
> luck.)  Could someone apply a cluestick?

\includeonly is currently not supported. If you are using a temp-dir
(the default), file names are mangled and \includeonly will fail.
(It *might* work if all the included files are in the same dir.)

In older versions, you could disable the temp-dir feature, maybe setting the
path to the empty string or so will still do this...

Günter



\includeonly on 1.6.2?

2009-05-03 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Hi,

1.6.2, Mac OS X 10.5.6.

 latex -version
pdfTeX 3.141592-1.40.3-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.6)
kpathsea version 3.5.6
Copyright 2007 Peter Breitenlohner (eTeX)/Han The Thanh (pdfTeX).
Kpathsea is copyright 2007 Karl Berry and Olaf Weber.
There is NO warranty.  Redistribution of this software is
covered by the terms of both the pdfTeX copyright and
the Lesser GNU General Public License.
For more information about these matters, see the file
named COPYING and the pdfTeX source.
Primary author of pdfTeX: Peter Breitenlohner (eTeX)/Han The Thanh (pdfTeX).
Kpathsea written by Karl Berry, Olaf Weber, and others.

Compiled with libpng 1.2.15; using libpng 1.2.15
Compiled with zlib 1.2.3; using zlib 1.2.3
Compiled with xpdf version 3.01

(This is from gwTeX.)   

When I use \includeonly with multiple files. I get the correct ToC and
such at the beginning of the output, but the included file doesn't
ever show up.  I'm sure I've missed something in the documentation,
but I've looked through it several times & can't see what I've done
wrong.  (I've tried absolute paths, relative paths, &c, all without
luck.)  Could someone apply a cluestick?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
a...@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.