Re: Equation Array

2009-09-02 Thread Julio Rojas
credbe...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> 2009/9/2 Ignacio García <ignacio.gmora...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Julio Rojas <jcredbe...@...> writes: >>> >>>> Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an >>>> equati

Re: Equation Array

2009-09-02 Thread Paul A. Rubin
which should work pretty well (it avoids gratuitous space in the middle of the constraints). I guess it's a matter of taste (unless the constraints get long enough that eqnarray sends the equation numbers into another galaxy). /Paul - Julio R

Re: Equation Array

2009-09-02 Thread Julio Rojas
hich > should work pretty well (it avoids gratuitous space in the middle of the > constraints). > > I guess it's a matter of taste (unless the constraints get long enough that > eqnarray sends the equation numbers into another galaxy). > > /Paul > >>

Re: Equation Array

2009-09-02 Thread Paul A. Rubin
into three columns), in which case I put "maximize" and "subject to" in the left column, indexing in the right column and everything else in the middle. Most times I create a display equation, then create an array with five columns, and go from there. I think I've used align

Equation

2009-08-22 Thread Alexis Salcedo
Hello. How do I align the equation, with item 1? See attached file. Thanks -- Ing. Alexis Salcedo ECUACIÓN.lyx Description: application/lyx

Re: Equation

2009-08-22 Thread James C. Sutherland
On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Alexis Salcedo wrote: Hello. How do I align the equation, with item 1? See attached file. Thanks Can you be more specific? What do you men by align?

Re: Equation

2009-08-22 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Alexis Salcedo wrote: Hello. How do I align the equation, with item 1? See attached file. Thanks Is this what you had in mind? (Disclaimer: horrible kludge. LaTeX purists, please don't hate me!) /Paul ECUACIÓN2.lyx Description: application/lyx

Equation

2009-08-22 Thread Alexis Salcedo
Hello. How do I align the equation, with item 1? See attached file. Thanks -- Ing. Alexis Salcedo ECUACIÓN.lyx Description: application/lyx

Re: Equation

2009-08-22 Thread James C. Sutherland
On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Alexis Salcedo wrote: Hello. How do I align the equation, with item 1? See attached file. Thanks Can you be more specific? What do you men by align?

Re: Equation

2009-08-22 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Alexis Salcedo wrote: Hello. How do I align the equation, with item 1? See attached file. Thanks Is this what you had in mind? (Disclaimer: horrible kludge. LaTeX purists, please don't hate me!) /Paul ECUACIÓN2.lyx Description: application/lyx

Equation

2009-08-22 Thread Alexis Salcedo
Hello. How do I align the equation, with item 1? See attached file. Thanks -- Ing. Alexis Salcedo ECUACIÓN.lyx Description: application/lyx

Re: Equation

2009-08-22 Thread James C. Sutherland
On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Alexis Salcedo wrote: Hello. How do I align the equation, with item 1? See attached file. Thanks Can you be more specific? What do you men by "align?"

Re: Equation

2009-08-22 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Alexis Salcedo wrote: Hello. How do I align the equation, with item 1? See attached file. Thanks Is this what you had in mind? (Disclaimer: horrible kludge. LaTeX purists, please don't hate me!) /Paul ECUACIÓN2.lyx Description: application/lyx

Change display equation to ams align

2009-08-06 Thread Neal Becker
If I typed in an equation as display, and then decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline), how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed? Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is exactly the way to destroy your work.

RE: Change display equation to ams align

2009-08-06 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
If I typed in an equation as display, and the decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline), how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed? Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is exactly the way to destroy your work. Don't select the equation then :). If your

RE: Change display equation to ams align

2009-08-06 Thread Neal Becker
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: If I typed in an equation as display, and the decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline), how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed? Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is exactly the way to destroy your work

Change display equation to ams align

2009-08-06 Thread Neal Becker
If I typed in an equation as display, and then decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline), how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed? Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is exactly the way to destroy your work.

RE: Change display equation to ams align

2009-08-06 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
If I typed in an equation as display, and the decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline), how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed? Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is exactly the way to destroy your work. Don't select the equation then :). If your

RE: Change display equation to ams align

2009-08-06 Thread Neal Becker
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: If I typed in an equation as display, and the decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline), how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed? Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is exactly the way to destroy your work

Change display equation to ams align

2009-08-06 Thread Neal Becker
If I typed in an equation as display, and then decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline), how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed? Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is exactly the way to destroy your work.

RE: Change display equation to ams align

2009-08-06 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>If I typed in an equation as display, and the >decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline), >how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed? > >Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is >exactly the way to destroy your work. Don't s

RE: Change display equation to ams align

2009-08-06 Thread Neal Becker
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: >>If I typed in an equation as display, and the >>decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline), >>how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed? >> >>Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is >

Repeating a multi-line equation

2009-06-23 Thread Ben M.
Hi, I'm working on a document that looks like this: Lots of text Multi-line equation #1 More text Multi-line equation #2 More text ... Summary of useful equations: Multi-line equation #1 Multi-line equation #2 Ideally, if I change something, I should only have to change it in one

Repeating a multi-line equation

2009-06-23 Thread Ben M.
Hi, I'm working on a document that looks like this: Lots of text Multi-line equation #1 More text Multi-line equation #2 More text ... Summary of useful equations: Multi-line equation #1 Multi-line equation #2 Ideally, if I change something, I should only have to change it in one

Repeating a multi-line equation

2009-06-23 Thread Ben M.
Hi, I'm working on a document that looks like this: Lots of text Multi-line equation #1 More text Multi-line equation #2 More text ... Summary of useful equations: Multi-line equation #1 Multi-line equation #2 Ideally, if I change something, I should only have to change it in one

How to insert text in a multiline equation?

2009-04-14 Thread Ming Jiang
Hi, I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example, a = 1, if some condition is met 2, if some condition is met like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX. How can I do this in LyX? Thank you very much!

Re: How to insert text in a multiline equation?

2009-04-14 Thread Florian Rubach
Ming Jiang schrieb: Hi, I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example, a = 1, if some condition is met 2, if some condition is met like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX. How can I do this in LyX? Thank you very much! Take a look at the math-manual (to be found

Re: How to insert text in a multiline equation?

2009-04-14 Thread Florian Rubach
Ming Jiang schrieb: Hi, I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example, a = 1, if some condition is met 2, if some condition is met like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX. How can I do this in LyX? Thank you very much! For the text, you can simply use the \text

Re: How to insert text in a multiline equation?

2009-04-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Ming Jiang schrieb: I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example, a = 1, if some condition is met 2, if some condition is met like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX. How can I do this in LyX? Use the shortcut Alt+M M which inserts math text. For more info about LyX

How to insert text in a multiline equation?

2009-04-14 Thread Ming Jiang
Hi, I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example, a = 1, if some condition is met 2, if some condition is met like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX. How can I do this in LyX? Thank you very much!

Re: How to insert text in a multiline equation?

2009-04-14 Thread Florian Rubach
Ming Jiang schrieb: Hi, I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example, a = 1, if some condition is met 2, if some condition is met like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX. How can I do this in LyX? Thank you very much! Take a look at the math-manual (to be found

Re: How to insert text in a multiline equation?

2009-04-14 Thread Florian Rubach
Ming Jiang schrieb: Hi, I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example, a = 1, if some condition is met 2, if some condition is met like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX. How can I do this in LyX? Thank you very much! For the text, you can simply use the \text

Re: How to insert text in a multiline equation?

2009-04-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Ming Jiang schrieb: I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example, a = 1, if some condition is met 2, if some condition is met like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX. How can I do this in LyX? Use the shortcut Alt+M M which inserts math text. For more info about LyX

How to insert text in a multiline equation?

2009-04-14 Thread Ming Jiang
Hi, I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example, a = 1, if some condition is met 2, if some condition is met like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX. How can I do this in LyX? Thank you very much!

Re: How to insert text in a multiline equation?

2009-04-14 Thread Florian Rubach
Ming Jiang schrieb: Hi, I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example, a = 1, if some condition is met 2, if some condition is met like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX. How can I do this in LyX? Thank you very much! Take a look at the math-manual (to be found

Re: How to insert text in a multiline equation?

2009-04-14 Thread Florian Rubach
Ming Jiang schrieb: Hi, I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example, a = 1, if some condition is met 2, if some condition is met like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX. How can I do this in LyX? Thank you very much! For the text, you can simply use the \text

Re: How to insert text in a multiline equation?

2009-04-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Ming Jiang schrieb: I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example, a = 1, if some condition is met 2, if some condition is met like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX. How can I do this in LyX? Use the shortcut "Alt+M M" which inserts math text. For more info

Re: why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-23 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-02-21, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Erez Yerushalmi wrote: I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output doesn't get jammed with a crash. In Document Settings

Re: why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-23 Thread Erez Yerushalmi
Thanks, that is useful! I prefer keeping it organized in the preamble. Erez On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.berlios.dewrote: On 2009-02-21, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Erez Yerushalmi wrote: I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble

Re: why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-23 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-02-21, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Erez Yerushalmi wrote: I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output doesn't get jammed with a crash. In Document Settings

Re: why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-23 Thread Erez Yerushalmi
Thanks, that is useful! I prefer keeping it organized in the preamble. Erez On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.berlios.dewrote: On 2009-02-21, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Erez Yerushalmi wrote: I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble

Re: why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-23 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-02-21, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Erez Yerushalmi wrote: >> I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for >> quite some time. >> Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF >> output doesn't get jammed w

Re: why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-23 Thread Erez Yerushalmi
Thanks, that is useful! I prefer keeping it organized in the preamble. Erez On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Guenter Milde <mi...@users.berlios.de>wrote: > On 2009-02-21, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > > Erez Yerushalmi wrote: > > >> I've been using \num

Re: why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-22 Thread Erez Yerushalmi
\numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output doesn't get jammed with a crash. This must mean I don't really understand something. When I remove \numberwithin{equation}{section} from

Re: why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-22 Thread Erez Yerushalmi
\numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output doesn't get jammed with a crash. This must mean I don't really understand something. When I remove \numberwithin{equation}{section} from

Re: why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-22 Thread Erez Yerushalmi
n >> help me? >> >> I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for >> quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time >> until the PDF output doesn't get jammed with a crash. >> This must mean I don't really unde

why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-21 Thread Erez Yerushalmi
Hi All, I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe one of you can help me? I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output doesn't get jammed with a crash

Re: why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-21 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Erez Yerushalmi wrote: I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe one of you can help me? I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output doesn't get

why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-21 Thread Erez Yerushalmi
Hi All, I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe one of you can help me? I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output doesn't get jammed with a crash

Re: why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-21 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Erez Yerushalmi wrote: I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe one of you can help me? I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output doesn't get

why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-21 Thread Erez Yerushalmi
Hi All, I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe one of you can help me? I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output doesn't get jammed with a crash

Re: why doesn't \numberwithin{equation}{section} work?

2009-02-21 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Erez Yerushalmi wrote: I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe one of you can help me? I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output doesn't get

labeling parts of an equation

2009-02-14 Thread Micha Feigin
I want to label parts of an equation (such as with overset). There are two problems when using overset 1. If equation elements are of different height then labels come out in different heights 2. If the label is wider than the equation element it ruins spacing (the equation gets spaces around

Re: labeling parts of an equation

2009-02-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Micha Feigin schrieb: I want to label parts of an equation (such as with overset). There are two problems when using overset 1. If equation elements are of different height then labels come out in different heights When it is important that they all are in the same height, then use a vertical

labeling parts of an equation

2009-02-14 Thread Micha Feigin
I want to label parts of an equation (such as with overset). There are two problems when using overset 1. If equation elements are of different height then labels come out in different heights 2. If the label is wider than the equation element it ruins spacing (the equation gets spaces around

Re: labeling parts of an equation

2009-02-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Micha Feigin schrieb: I want to label parts of an equation (such as with overset). There are two problems when using overset 1. If equation elements are of different height then labels come out in different heights When it is important that they all are in the same height, then use a vertical

labeling parts of an equation

2009-02-14 Thread Micha Feigin
I want to label parts of an equation (such as with overset). There are two problems when using overset 1. If equation elements are of different height then labels come out in different heights 2. If the label is wider than the equation element it ruins spacing (the equation gets spaces around

Re: labeling parts of an equation

2009-02-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Micha Feigin schrieb: I want to label parts of an equation (such as with overset). There are two problems when using overset 1. If equation elements are of different height then labels come out in different heights When it is important that they all are in the same height, then use a vertical

custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Ivan Werning
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Neil Hepburn
Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3) and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Ivan Werning
is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation numbering natively, given how standard it is. -Ivan On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote: Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go

custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Ivan Werning
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Neil Hepburn
Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3) and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Ivan Werning
is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation numbering natively, given how standard it is. -Ivan On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote: Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go

custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Ivan Werning
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen by default because it comes after "(4)". That'

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen by default because it comes after &qu

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Neil Hepburn
Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3) and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Ivan Werning
is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation numbering natively, given how standard it is. -Ivan On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote: Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go

Problems with equation numbering in appendix

2008-12-07 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
Hi all, I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I disable numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed only in math mode. Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj

Re: Problems with equation numbering in appendix

2008-12-07 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed only in math mode. Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj

Re: Problems with equation numbering in appendix

2008-12-07 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj

Problems with equation numbering in appendix

2008-12-07 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
Hi all, I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I disable numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed only in math mode. Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj

Re: Problems with equation numbering in appendix

2008-12-07 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed only in math mode. Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj

Re: Problems with equation numbering in appendix

2008-12-07 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj

Problems with equation numbering in appendix

2008-12-07 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
Hi all, I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I disable numbering on all equations, I get the error "\mathrm allowed only in math mode". Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices?

Re: Problems with equation numbering in appendix

2008-12-07 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
numbering on all equations, I get the error "\mathrm allowed only in math mode". Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj

Re: Problems with equation numbering in appendix

2008-12-07 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
ork around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj

Re: How to number an inline equation

2008-12-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Kuang Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The ONLY difference is that those real display equations created by CTRL+SHIFT+M has a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like. Make sure that the display equation is in the _same_ paragraph as the text above/below

Re: How to number an inline equation

2008-12-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Kuang Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The ONLY difference is that those real display equations created by CTRL+SHIFT+M has a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like. Make sure that the display equation is in the _same_ paragraph as the text above/below

Re: How to number an inline equation

2008-12-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Kuang Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The ONLY difference is that those real display equations created by > CTRL+SHIFT+M has a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, > which I don't quite look like. Make sure that the display equation is in the _same_ paragraph as

How to number an inline equation

2008-12-03 Thread Kuang Chen
spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like. Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this, or EQUIVALENTLY, how can I modify the style of real displaystyle equation which can

Re: How to number an inline equation

2008-12-03 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like. Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this, This is not a good way of doing it (also paragraph indentation becomes wrong

Re: How to number an inline equation

2008-12-03 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Kuang Chen wrote: Hi, Konrad: Problem solved. I found the reason seems to be that spacing is big whenever I want to insert a real display equation in a separate line. However if I insert it right after a paragraph by ctrl+alt+n, a new box will also show up on a new line below

How to number an inline equation

2008-12-03 Thread Kuang Chen
spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like. Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this, or EQUIVALENTLY, how can I modify the style of real displaystyle equation which can

Re: How to number an inline equation

2008-12-03 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like. Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this, This is not a good way of doing it (also paragraph indentation becomes wrong

Re: How to number an inline equation

2008-12-03 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Kuang Chen wrote: Hi, Konrad: Problem solved. I found the reason seems to be that spacing is big whenever I want to insert a real display equation in a separate line. However if I insert it right after a paragraph by ctrl+alt+n, a new box will also show up on a new line below

How to number an inline equation

2008-12-03 Thread Kuang Chen
spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like. Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this, or EQUIVALENTLY, how can I modify the style of real displaystyle equation which can

Re: How to number an inline equation

2008-12-03 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like. Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this, This is not a good way of doing it (also paragraph indentation becomes wrong

Re: How to number an inline equation

2008-12-03 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Kuang Chen wrote: Hi, Konrad: Problem solved. I found the reason seems to be that spacing is big whenever I want to insert a real display equation in a separate line. However if I insert it right after a paragraph by ctrl+alt+n, a new box will also show up on a new line below

Equation numbering

2008-11-26 Thread Paulina Restrepo
Hi, I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered but the label appears to the far right of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label appear at the far left of the equation. Thank you very much for your help, Paulina

Re: Equation numbering

2008-11-26 Thread Neil Hepburn
my equations numbered but the label appears to the far right of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label appear at the far left of the equation. Thank you very much for your help, Paulina

Equation numbering

2008-11-26 Thread Paulina Restrepo
Hi, I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered but the label appears to the far right of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label appear at the far left of the equation. Thank you very much for your help, Paulina

Re: Equation numbering

2008-11-26 Thread Neil Hepburn
my equations numbered but the label appears to the far right of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label appear at the far left of the equation. Thank you very much for your help, Paulina

Equation numbering

2008-11-26 Thread Paulina Restrepo
Hi, I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered but the label appears to the far right of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label appear at the far left of the equation. Thank you very much for your help, Paulina

Re: Equation numbering

2008-11-26 Thread Neil Hepburn
ht now I have all my equations numbered but the label appears to the far right of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label appear at the far left of the equation. Thank you very much for your help, Paulina

Equation array and two column layout

2008-11-25 Thread Julio Rojas
Dear all, I'm finishing a paper with the two columned article class. I have a problem with some equation arrays that are two big for this format. They span over the other column or over the margins, even with an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem? Should I use an even

Re: Equation array and two column layout

2008-11-25 Thread Vittorio Zuccala'
PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I'm finishing a paper with the two columned article class. I have a problem with some equation arrays that are two big for this format. They span over the other column or over the margins, even with an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem

Re: Equation array and two column layout

2008-11-25 Thread Julio Rojas
with some equation arrays that are two big for this format. They span over the other column or over the margins, even with an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem? Should I use an even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I break the line in an equation array and put

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >