credbe...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/9/2 Ignacio García <ignacio.gmora...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Julio Rojas <jcredbe...@...> writes:
>>>
>>>> Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
>>>> equati
which should work pretty well (it avoids gratuitous space in
the middle of the constraints).
I guess it's a matter of taste (unless the constraints get long enough
that eqnarray sends the equation numbers into another galaxy).
/Paul
-
Julio R
hich
> should work pretty well (it avoids gratuitous space in the middle of the
> constraints).
>
> I guess it's a matter of taste (unless the constraints get long enough that
> eqnarray sends the equation numbers into another galaxy).
>
> /Paul
>
>>
into three columns), in which case I put
"maximize" and "subject to" in the left column, indexing in the right
column and everything else in the middle. Most times I create a display
equation, then create an array with five columns, and go from there. I
think I've used align
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
--
Ing. Alexis Salcedo
ECUACIÓN.lyx
Description: application/lyx
On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Alexis Salcedo wrote:
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
Can you be more specific? What do you men by align?
Alexis Salcedo wrote:
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
Is this what you had in mind? (Disclaimer: horrible kludge. LaTeX
purists, please don't hate me!)
/Paul
ECUACIÓN2.lyx
Description: application/lyx
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
--
Ing. Alexis Salcedo
ECUACIÓN.lyx
Description: application/lyx
On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Alexis Salcedo wrote:
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
Can you be more specific? What do you men by align?
Alexis Salcedo wrote:
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
Is this what you had in mind? (Disclaimer: horrible kludge. LaTeX
purists, please don't hate me!)
/Paul
ECUACIÓN2.lyx
Description: application/lyx
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
--
Ing. Alexis Salcedo
ECUACIÓN.lyx
Description: application/lyx
On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Alexis Salcedo wrote:
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
Can you be more specific? What do you men by "align?"
Alexis Salcedo wrote:
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
Is this what you had in mind? (Disclaimer: horrible kludge. LaTeX
purists, please don't hate me!)
/Paul
ECUACIÓN2.lyx
Description: application/lyx
If I typed in an equation as display, and then decide I'd like to turn it to
ams align (multiline), how can I do this without loosing everything I
already typed?
Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is exactly the way to
destroy your work.
If I typed in an equation as display, and the
decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline),
how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed?
Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is
exactly the way to destroy your work.
Don't select the equation then :).
If your
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
If I typed in an equation as display, and the
decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline),
how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed?
Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is
exactly the way to destroy your work
If I typed in an equation as display, and then decide I'd like to turn it to
ams align (multiline), how can I do this without loosing everything I
already typed?
Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is exactly the way to
destroy your work.
If I typed in an equation as display, and the
decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline),
how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed?
Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is
exactly the way to destroy your work.
Don't select the equation then :).
If your
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
If I typed in an equation as display, and the
decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline),
how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed?
Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is
exactly the way to destroy your work
If I typed in an equation as display, and then decide I'd like to turn it to
ams align (multiline), how can I do this without loosing everything I
already typed?
Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is exactly the way to
destroy your work.
>If I typed in an equation as display, and the
>decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline),
>how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed?
>
>Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is
>exactly the way to destroy your work.
Don't s
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>>If I typed in an equation as display, and the
>>decide I'd like to turn it to ams align (multiline),
>>how can I do this without loosing everything I already typed?
>>
>>Selecting the equation, then insert/math/ams align is
>
Hi, I'm working on a document that looks like this:
Lots of text
Multi-line equation #1
More text
Multi-line equation #2
More text
...
Summary of useful equations:
Multi-line equation #1
Multi-line equation #2
Ideally, if I change something, I should only have to change it in one
Hi, I'm working on a document that looks like this:
Lots of text
Multi-line equation #1
More text
Multi-line equation #2
More text
...
Summary of useful equations:
Multi-line equation #1
Multi-line equation #2
Ideally, if I change something, I should only have to change it in one
Hi, I'm working on a document that looks like this:
Lots of text
Multi-line equation #1
More text
Multi-line equation #2
More text
...
Summary of useful equations:
Multi-line equation #1
Multi-line equation #2
Ideally, if I change something, I should only have to change it in one
Hi,
I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example,
a = 1, if some condition is met
2, if some condition is met
like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX.
How can I do this in LyX?
Thank you very much!
Ming Jiang schrieb:
Hi,
I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example,
a = 1, if some condition is met
2, if some condition is met
like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX.
How can I do this in LyX?
Thank you very much!
Take a look at the math-manual (to be found
Ming Jiang schrieb:
Hi,
I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example,
a = 1, if some condition is met
2, if some condition is met
like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX.
How can I do this in LyX?
Thank you very much!
For the text, you can simply use the \text
Ming Jiang schrieb:
I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example,
a = 1, if some condition is met
2, if some condition is met
like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX.
How can I do this in LyX?
Use the shortcut Alt+M M which inserts math text. For more info about LyX
Hi,
I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example,
a = 1, if some condition is met
2, if some condition is met
like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX.
How can I do this in LyX?
Thank you very much!
Ming Jiang schrieb:
Hi,
I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example,
a = 1, if some condition is met
2, if some condition is met
like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX.
How can I do this in LyX?
Thank you very much!
Take a look at the math-manual (to be found
Ming Jiang schrieb:
Hi,
I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example,
a = 1, if some condition is met
2, if some condition is met
like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX.
How can I do this in LyX?
Thank you very much!
For the text, you can simply use the \text
Ming Jiang schrieb:
I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example,
a = 1, if some condition is met
2, if some condition is met
like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX.
How can I do this in LyX?
Use the shortcut Alt+M M which inserts math text. For more info about LyX
Hi,
I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example,
a = 1, if some condition is met
2, if some condition is met
like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX.
How can I do this in LyX?
Thank you very much!
Ming Jiang schrieb:
Hi,
I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example,
a = 1, if some condition is met
2, if some condition is met
like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX.
How can I do this in LyX?
Thank you very much!
Take a look at the math-manual (to be found
Ming Jiang schrieb:
Hi,
I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example,
a = 1, if some condition is met
2, if some condition is met
like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX.
How can I do this in LyX?
Thank you very much!
For the text, you can simply use the \text
Ming Jiang schrieb:
I want to insert text in a multiline equation, for example,
a = 1, if some condition is met
2, if some condition is met
like \text{if some condition is met} in TeX.
How can I do this in LyX?
Use the shortcut "Alt+M M" which inserts math text. For more info
On 2009-02-21, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for
quite some time.
Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF
output doesn't get jammed with a crash.
In Document Settings
Thanks, that is useful!
I prefer keeping it organized in the preamble.
Erez
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.berlios.dewrote:
On 2009-02-21, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble
On 2009-02-21, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for
quite some time.
Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF
output doesn't get jammed with a crash.
In Document Settings
Thanks, that is useful!
I prefer keeping it organized in the preamble.
Erez
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.berlios.dewrote:
On 2009-02-21, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble
On 2009-02-21, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
>> I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for
>> quite some time.
>> Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF
>> output doesn't get jammed w
Thanks, that is useful!
I prefer keeping it organized in the preamble.
Erez
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Guenter Milde <mi...@users.berlios.de>wrote:
> On 2009-02-21, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> > Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
>
> >> I've been using \num
\numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for
quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time
until the PDF output doesn't get jammed with a crash.
This must mean I don't really understand something.
When I remove \numberwithin{equation}{section} from
\numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for
quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time
until the PDF output doesn't get jammed with a crash.
This must mean I don't really understand something.
When I remove \numberwithin{equation}{section} from
n
>> help me?
>>
>> I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for
>> quite some time. Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time
>> until the PDF output doesn't get jammed with a crash.
>> This must mean I don't really unde
Hi All,
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe one of you can
help me?
I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for
quite some time.
Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output
doesn't get jammed with a crash
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe one of you
can help me?
I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for
quite some time.
Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF
output doesn't get
Hi All,
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe one of you can
help me?
I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for
quite some time.
Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output
doesn't get jammed with a crash
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe one of you
can help me?
I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for
quite some time.
Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF
output doesn't get
Hi All,
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe one of you can
help me?
I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for
quite some time.
Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF output
doesn't get jammed with a crash
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe one of you
can help me?
I've been using \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the preamble for
quite some time.
Every time I open a new template, it takes me some time until the PDF
output doesn't get
I want to label parts of an equation (such as with overset).
There are two problems when using overset
1. If equation elements are of different height then labels come out in
different heights
2. If the label is wider than the equation element it ruins spacing (the
equation gets spaces around
Micha Feigin schrieb:
I want to label parts of an equation (such as with overset).
There are two problems when using overset
1. If equation elements are of different height then labels come out in
different heights
When it is important that they all are in the same height, then use a vertical
I want to label parts of an equation (such as with overset).
There are two problems when using overset
1. If equation elements are of different height then labels come out in
different heights
2. If the label is wider than the equation element it ruins spacing (the
equation gets spaces around
Micha Feigin schrieb:
I want to label parts of an equation (such as with overset).
There are two problems when using overset
1. If equation elements are of different height then labels come out in
different heights
When it is important that they all are in the same height, then use a vertical
I want to label parts of an equation (such as with overset).
There are two problems when using overset
1. If equation elements are of different height then labels come out in
different heights
2. If the label is wider than the equation element it ruins spacing (the
equation gets spaces around
Micha Feigin schrieb:
I want to label parts of an equation (such as with overset).
There are two problems when using overset
1. If equation elements are of different height then labels come out in
different heights
When it is important that they all are in the same height, then use a vertical
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen
by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal
Ivan Werning wrote:
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen
by default because it comes after (4). That's
Hi Ivan,
Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and
make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3)
and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do
all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting
is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really
value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation
numbering natively, given how standard it is.
-Ivan
On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen
by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal
Ivan Werning wrote:
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen
by default because it comes after (4). That's
Hi Ivan,
Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and
make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3)
and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do
all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting
is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really
value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation
numbering natively, given how standard it is.
-Ivan
On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen
by default because it comes after "(4)". That'
Ivan Werning wrote:
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen
by default because it comes after &qu
Hi Ivan,
Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and
make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3)
and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do
all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting
is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really
value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation
numbering natively, given how standard it is.
-Ivan
On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go
Hi all,
I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I
disable numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed
only in math mode.
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed
only in math mode.
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
Hi all,
I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I
disable numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed
only in math mode.
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed
only in math mode.
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
Hi all,
I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I
disable numbering on all equations, I get the error "\mathrm allowed
only in math mode".
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
numbering on all equations, I get the error "\mathrm allowed
only in math mode".
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
ork around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
Kuang Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The ONLY difference is that those real display equations created by
CTRL+SHIFT+M has a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs,
which I don't quite look like.
Make sure that the display equation is in the _same_ paragraph as
the text above/below
Kuang Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The ONLY difference is that those real display equations created by
CTRL+SHIFT+M has a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs,
which I don't quite look like.
Make sure that the display equation is in the _same_ paragraph as
the text above/below
Kuang Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The ONLY difference is that those real display equations created by
> CTRL+SHIFT+M has a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs,
> which I don't quite look like.
Make sure that the display equation is in the _same_ paragraph as
spacings away from its
adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like.
Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was
wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this, or EQUIVALENTLY, how
can I modify the style of real displaystyle equation which can
a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like.
Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was
wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this,
This is not a good way of doing it (also paragraph indentation becomes
wrong
Kuang Chen wrote:
Hi, Konrad:
Problem solved. I found the reason seems to be that spacing is big whenever
I want to insert a real display equation in a separate line. However if I
insert it right after a paragraph by ctrl+alt+n, a new box will also show up on
a new line below
spacings away from its
adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like.
Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was
wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this, or EQUIVALENTLY, how
can I modify the style of real displaystyle equation which can
a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like.
Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was
wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this,
This is not a good way of doing it (also paragraph indentation becomes
wrong
Kuang Chen wrote:
Hi, Konrad:
Problem solved. I found the reason seems to be that spacing is big whenever
I want to insert a real display equation in a separate line. However if I
insert it right after a paragraph by ctrl+alt+n, a new box will also show up on
a new line below
spacings away from its
adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like.
Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was
wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this, or EQUIVALENTLY, how
can I modify the style of real displaystyle equation which can
a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like.
Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was
wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this,
This is not a good way of doing it (also paragraph indentation becomes
wrong
Kuang Chen wrote:
Hi, Konrad:
Problem solved. I found the reason seems to be that spacing is big whenever
I want to insert a real display equation in a separate line. However if I
insert it right after a paragraph by ctrl+alt+n, a new box will also show up on
a new line below
Hi,
I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered
but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
my equations
numbered but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
Hi,
I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered
but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
my equations
numbered but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
Hi,
I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered
but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
ht now I have all my equations
numbered but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
Dear all, I'm finishing a paper with the two columned article class. I
have a problem with some equation arrays that are two big for this
format. They span over the other column or over the margins, even with
an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem?
Should I use an even
PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all, I'm finishing a paper with the two columned article class. I
have a problem with some equation arrays that are two big for this
format. They span over the other column or over the margins, even with
an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem
with some equation arrays that are two big for this
format. They span over the other column or over the margins, even with
an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem?
Should I use an even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I
break the line in an equation array and put
401 - 500 of 1943 matches
Mail list logo