dings
Luis (can I call it a macro ?), for instance, the proton concentation
Luis mentioned above in a way that if I, for instance, type Alt-F1
Luis the whole thing shows up. I would really appreciate
Luis pointers/suggestions so as how to do this, it it can be done.
What we have now are math ma
dings
Luis (can I call it a macro ?), for instance, the proton concentation
Luis mentioned above in a way that if I, for instance, type Alt-F1
Luis the whole thing shows up. I would really appreciate
Luis pointers/suggestions so as how to do this, it it can be done.
What we have now are math ma
gestions so as how to do this, it it can be done.
What we have now are math macros (look in the user guide on how to do
that). Once the macro is setup, you can probably bind a key to
math-insert foo
to insert macro foo.
I do not know whether this is what you want...
JMarc
Hi all,
So far I've been quite happy with LyX for some 3 years now. I've done a
lot of writing with it: papers, articles, books, classnotes, lists of
problems for the students and so on. However, I have to write a LOT of
chemistry, which is rather tedious (things like proton concentration:
[H+]
Hi all,
So far I've been quite happy with LyX for some 3 years now. I've done a
lot of writing with it: papers, articles, books, classnotes, lists of
problems for the students and so on. However, I have to write a LOT of
chemistry, which is rather tedious (things like proton concentration:
[H+]
Hi all,
So far I've been quite happy with LyX for some 3 years now. I've done a
lot of writing with it: papers, articles, books, classnotes, lists of
problems for the students and so on. However, I have to write a LOT of
chemistry, which is rather tedious (things like proton concentration:
[H+]
I have two problems with math macros.
1) I would like to put all my lyx math macros into one
lyx file and then include them into each chapter of
my thesis. However there doesn't seem to be a way
to do this. Each document inclusion method I tried
doesn't work. Most fustrating
I have two problems with math macros.
1) I would like to put all my lyx math macros into one
lyx file and then include them into each chapter of
my thesis. However there doesn't seem to be a way
to do this. Each document inclusion method I tried
doesn't work. Most fustrating
I have two problems with math macros.
1) I would like to put all my lyx math macros into one
lyx file and then include them into each chapter of
my thesis. However there doesn't seem to be a way
to do this. Each document inclusion method I tried
doesn't work. Most fustrating
Hi there!
I just had some problems latexing one of my lyx-files. I found out that
the name of a macro must not contain any numbers, i.e. a macro named
gl2x is not possible. Unfortunately LyX doesn't complain if you use a
number in the name of a macro. I think this should be changed. LyX
should
"Ingo" == Ingo Kloecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ingo Hi there! I just had some problems latexing one of my
Ingo lyx-files. I found out that the name of a macro must not contain
Ingo any numbers, i.e. a macro named gl2x is not
Ingo possible. Unfortunately LyX doesn't complain if you use a
Hi there!
I just had some problems latexing one of my lyx-files. I found out that
the name of a macro must not contain any numbers, i.e. a macro named
gl2x is not possible. Unfortunately LyX doesn't complain if you use a
number in the name of a macro. I think this should be changed. LyX
should
"Ingo" == Ingo Kloecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ingo Hi there! I just had some problems latexing one of my
Ingo lyx-files. I found out that the name of a macro must not contain
Ingo any numbers, i.e. a macro named gl2x is not
Ingo possible. Unfortunately LyX doesn't complain if you use a
Hi there!
I just had some problems latexing one of my lyx-files. I found out that
the name of a macro must not contain any numbers, i.e. a macro named
gl2x is not possible. Unfortunately LyX doesn't complain if you use a
number in the name of a macro. I think this should be changed. LyX
should
> "Ingo" == Ingo Kloecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ingo> Hi there! I just had some problems latexing one of my
Ingo> lyx-files. I found out that the name of a macro must not contain
Ingo> any numbers, i.e. a macro named gl2x is not
Ingo> possible. Unfortunately LyX doesn't complain if
On 21-Apr-99 Etienne Grossmann wrote:
indeed, LyX "sees" all the macros that have been defined in all
its open documents (and apparently in those it has closed too).
Sorry for not having thought about that ...
That's ok -- now that it is known, it can be fixed! :)
On 21-Apr-99 Etienne Grossmann wrote:
indeed, LyX "sees" all the macros that have been defined in all
its open documents (and apparently in those it has closed too).
Sorry for not having thought about that ...
That's ok -- now that it is known, it can be fixed! :)
On 21-Apr-99 Etienne Grossmann wrote:
> indeed, LyX "sees" all the macros that have been defined in all
> its open documents (and apparently in those it has closed too).
>
> Sorry for not having thought about that ...
That's ok -- now that it is known, it can b
Hello,
so, you do "M-x msol" , then write a 'm' with a dot, then use,
in math-mode, the macro '\msol', which appears fine on the screen,
but LaTeX won't compile? Strange indeed.
Could you create a short file, with e.g. just the macro definition
and an instance of it, check whether LaTeX
John Ya-ya wrote:
It seemed to me that this would allow me to define a macro, say "msol", to save
me from having to type a lot when I want to insert the M-with-subscripted-odot
that represents a "solar mass". Ok, I defined the macro as directed, and went
into a math box and typed "\msol"
it. :)
It's puzzling that this is so, however... some kind of hierarchy
consideration, maybe? I also found that, even if the macro is defined in
another currently opened document, but *not* in the one in which it is used, it
will display correctly on-screen! This seems to me a definite bug -
Hello,
so, you do "M-x msol" , then write a 'm' with a dot, then use,
in math-mode, the macro '\msol', which appears fine on the screen,
but LaTeX won't compile? Strange indeed.
Could you create a short file, with e.g. just the macro definition
and an instance of it, check whether LaTeX
John Ya-ya wrote:
It seemed to me that this would allow me to define a macro, say "msol", to save
me from having to type a lot when I want to insert the M-with-subscripted-odot
that represents a "solar mass". Ok, I defined the macro as directed, and went
into a math box and typed "\msol"
it. :)
It's puzzling that this is so, however... some kind of hierarchy
consideration, maybe? I also found that, even if the macro is defined in
another currently opened document, but *not* in the one in which it is used, it
will display correctly on-screen! This seems to me a definite bug -
Hello,
so, you do "M-x msol" , then write a 'm' with a dot, then use,
in math-mode, the macro '\msol', which appears fine on the screen,
but LaTeX won't compile? Strange indeed.
Could you create a short file, with e.g. just the macro definition
and an instance of it, check whether LaTeX
John Ya-ya wrote:
>
> It seemed to me that this would allow me to define a macro, say "msol", to save
> me from having to type a lot when I want to insert the M-with-subscripted-odot
> that represents a "solar mass". Ok, I defined the macro as directed, and went
> into a math box and typed
now I've found the right
way to do it. :)
It's puzzling that this is so, however... some kind of hierarchy
consideration, maybe? I also found that, even if the macro is defined in
another currently opened document, but *not* in the one in which it is used, it
will display correctly on-
Hi, all...
Sorry to be posting here every day or so, but I've come across
something that does not seem to work as documented. (It doesn't seem to work
at all!) I read with interest the section in the User Guide on math macros.
It seemed to me that this would allow me to define a macro
Hi, all...
Sorry to be posting here every day or so, but I've come across
something that does not seem to work as documented. (It doesn't seem to work
at all!) I read with interest the section in the User Guide on math macros.
It seemed to me that this would allow me to define a macro
Hi, all...
Sorry to be posting here every day or so, but I've come across
something that does not seem to work as documented. (It doesn't seem to work
at all!) I read with interest the section in the User Guide on math macros.
It seemed to me that this would allow me to define a macro
601 - 630 of 630 matches
Mail list logo
