### Re: xetex and theorem

Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torquil at gmail.com writes: On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: A crude workaround is to put \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{} in your preamble. Thank you very much! I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew

### Re: xetex and theorem

Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torquil at gmail.com writes: On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: A crude workaround is to put \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{} in your preamble. Thank you very much! I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew

### Re: xetex and theorem

Torquil Macdonald Sørensen gmail.com> writes: > > On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > A crude workaround is to put > > \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{} > > in your preamble. > > Thank you very much! > I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew

### Re: xetex and theorem

Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works fine when not using Theorems. The error I get is: ! Undefined control sequence. \definitionname -\inputencoding {latin9}Definition Yes, that's a known bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800 A crude workaround is to put \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{} in your preamble. HTH Jürgen

### Re: xetex and theorem

On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works fine when not using Theorems. The error I get is: ! Undefined control sequence. \definitionname -\inputencoding {latin9}Definition Yes, that's a known bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800 A crude workaround is to put \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{} in your preamble. Thank you very much! Torquil

### Re: xetex and theorem

Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works fine when not using Theorems. The error I get is: ! Undefined control sequence. \definitionname -\inputencoding {latin9}Definition Yes, that's a known bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800 A crude workaround is to put \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{} in your preamble. HTH Jürgen

### Re: xetex and theorem

On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works fine when not using Theorems. The error I get is: ! Undefined control sequence. \definitionname -\inputencoding {latin9}Definition Yes, that's a known bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800 A crude workaround is to put \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{} in your preamble. Thank you very much! Torquil

### Re: xetex and theorem

Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: > I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the > Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It > works fine when not using Theorems. > > The error I get is: > > "! Undefined control sequence. > \definitionname ->\inputencoding > {latin9}Definition Yes, that's a known bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800 A crude workaround is to put \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{} in your preamble. HTH Jürgen

### Re: xetex and theorem

On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works fine when not using Theorems. The error I get is: "! Undefined control sequence. \definitionname ->\inputencoding {latin9}Definition Yes, that's a known bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800 A crude workaround is to put \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{} in your preamble. Thank you very much! Torquil