Re: xetex and theorem
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torquil at gmail.com writes:
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
Thank you very much!
I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew
Re: xetex and theorem
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torquil at gmail.com writes:
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
Thank you very much!
I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew
Re: xetex and theorem
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen gmail.com> writes:
>
> On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > A crude workaround is to put
> > \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
> > in your preamble.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew
Re: xetex and theorem
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
HTH
Jürgen
Re: xetex and theorem
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
Thank you very much!
Torquil
Re: xetex and theorem
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
HTH
Jürgen
Re: xetex and theorem
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
Thank you very much!
Torquil
Re: xetex and theorem
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the
> Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
> works fine when not using Theorems.
>
> The error I get is:
>
> "! Undefined control sequence.
> \definitionname ->\inputencoding
> {latin9}Definition
Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
HTH
Jürgen
Re: xetex and theorem
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
"! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname ->\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
Thank you very much!
Torquil
