lyx 1.6.x on debian
Hi, It's great to to have the 1.6.0~beta4-1 package in experimental, with matching dependencies of testing. Thank you kindly, maintainer Sven Hoexter, for your effort! Does anyone know whether, RC5 is a candidate for experimental? Or how close is 1.6.0 to make it into any Debian stream? This might reduce the duplication of old bugs this: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5464 Cheers, Sam
Re: lyx 1.6.x on debian
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:28:40PM +, Sam Lewis wrote: Hi Sam, It's great to to have the 1.6.0~beta4-1 package in experimental, with matching dependencies of testing. Thank you kindly, maintainer Sven Hoexter, for your effort! Thanks but I'm not alone. Per also did a lot in the past and is still one of the forces behind the packaging for Debian. From time to time we even have very helpfull support from Georg. :) Does anyone know whether, RC5 is a candidate for experimental? Or how close is 1.6.0 to make it into any Debian stream? Well beside travelling my focus during the summer was on helping to release lenny which is in a good shape now but not released and work on my Debian Developer application. So in general it's a we just need to pick it up issue. I'll see if I find the time to upgrade the version in our repository to the latest LyX RC and get Per to upload it next week. Sven
Re: lyx 1.6.x on debian
Sven Hoexter wrote: I'll see if I find the time to upgrade the version in our repository to the latest LyX RC and get Per to upload it next week. LyX 1.6 is due out today, so if you're going to package something, package that! rh
Re: lyx 1.6.x on debian
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:16:45AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: I'll see if I find the time to upgrade the version in our repository to the latest LyX RC and get Per to upload it next week. LyX 1.6 is due out today, so if you're going to package something, package that! Ah thanks for the hint Richard. I didn't follow the lists during the last weeks. Sven
Re: lyx 1.6.x on debian
Excellent! Cheers, Sam
lyx 1.6.x on debian
Hi, It's great to to have the 1.6.0~beta4-1 package in experimental, with matching dependencies of testing. Thank you kindly, maintainer Sven Hoexter, for your effort! Does anyone know whether, RC5 is a candidate for experimental? Or how close is 1.6.0 to make it into any Debian stream? This might reduce the duplication of old bugs this: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5464 Cheers, Sam
Re: lyx 1.6.x on debian
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:28:40PM +, Sam Lewis wrote: Hi Sam, It's great to to have the 1.6.0~beta4-1 package in experimental, with matching dependencies of testing. Thank you kindly, maintainer Sven Hoexter, for your effort! Thanks but I'm not alone. Per also did a lot in the past and is still one of the forces behind the packaging for Debian. From time to time we even have very helpfull support from Georg. :) Does anyone know whether, RC5 is a candidate for experimental? Or how close is 1.6.0 to make it into any Debian stream? Well beside travelling my focus during the summer was on helping to release lenny which is in a good shape now but not released and work on my Debian Developer application. So in general it's a we just need to pick it up issue. I'll see if I find the time to upgrade the version in our repository to the latest LyX RC and get Per to upload it next week. Sven
Re: lyx 1.6.x on debian
Sven Hoexter wrote: I'll see if I find the time to upgrade the version in our repository to the latest LyX RC and get Per to upload it next week. LyX 1.6 is due out today, so if you're going to package something, package that! rh
Re: lyx 1.6.x on debian
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:16:45AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: I'll see if I find the time to upgrade the version in our repository to the latest LyX RC and get Per to upload it next week. LyX 1.6 is due out today, so if you're going to package something, package that! Ah thanks for the hint Richard. I didn't follow the lists during the last weeks. Sven
Re: lyx 1.6.x on debian
Excellent! Cheers, Sam
lyx 1.6.x on debian
Hi, It's great to to have the 1.6.0~beta4-1 package in "experimental", with matching dependencies of "testing". Thank you kindly, maintainer Sven Hoexter, for your effort! Does anyone know whether, RC5 is a candidate for "experimental"? Or how close is 1.6.0 to make it into any Debian stream? This might reduce the duplication of old bugs this: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5464 Cheers, Sam
Re: lyx 1.6.x on debian
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:28:40PM +, Sam Lewis wrote: Hi Sam, > It's great to to have the 1.6.0~beta4-1 package in "experimental", with > matching > dependencies of "testing". Thank you kindly, maintainer Sven Hoexter, for your > effort! Thanks but I'm not alone. Per also did a lot in the past and is still one of the forces behind the packaging for Debian. From time to time we even have very helpfull support from Georg. :) > Does anyone know whether, RC5 is a candidate for "experimental"? Or how close > is > 1.6.0 to make it into any Debian stream? Well beside travelling my focus during the summer was on helping to release lenny which is in a good shape now but not released and work on my Debian Developer application. So in general it's a "we just need to pick it up" issue. I'll see if I find the time to upgrade the version in our repository to the latest LyX RC and get Per to upload it next week. Sven
Re: lyx 1.6.x on debian
Sven Hoexter wrote: I'll see if I find the time to upgrade the version in our repository to the latest LyX RC and get Per to upload it next week. LyX 1.6 is due out today, so if you're going to package something, package that! rh
Re: lyx 1.6.x on debian
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:16:45AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: >> I'll see if I find the time to upgrade the version in our repository to the >> latest >> LyX RC and get Per to upload it next week. >> >> > LyX 1.6 is due out today, so if you're going to package something, > package that! Ah thanks for the hint Richard. I didn't follow the lists during the last weeks. Sven
Re: lyx 1.6.x on debian
Excellent! Cheers, Sam
