Re: Springer Nature layout file
Le 12/09/2022 à 12:18, Corrado Mencar a écrit : Dear Lyx Users, I have created the first version of a layout file for Springer Nature articles. Feel free to download it at: https://github.com/cmencar/lyx-sn <https://github.com/cmencar/lyx-sn> As a first version, the layout file may contains bugs and may not be complete of all SN options. Hi Corrado, When this layout has matured enough, it would be a good addition to the layouts that we distribute. Best, JMarc -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Springer Nature layout file
Dear Lyx Users, I have created the first version of a layout file for Springer Nature articles. Feel free to download it at: https://github.com/cmencar/lyx-sn As a first version, the layout file may contains bugs and may not be complete of all SN options. Best regards, Corrado Mencar -- Corrado Mencar -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
nature
Hi,
I'm using
\usepackage[style=nature,backend=biber]{biblatex}
but it puts the references directly in a row, without a comma/semicolon
in between.
Do I have to load an additional package?
I've tried natbib but it clashes.
Thanks
Bernd
nature
Hi,
I'm using
\usepackage[style=nature,backend=biber]{biblatex}
but it puts the references directly in a row, without a comma/semicolon
in between.
Do I have to load an additional package?
I've tried natbib but it clashes.
Thanks
Bernd
nature
Hi,
I'm using
\usepackage[style=nature,backend=biber]{biblatex}
but it puts the references directly in a row, without a comma/semicolon
in between.
Do I have to load an additional package?
I've tried natbib but it clashes.
Thanks
Bernd
Re: current issue of Nature
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Brett Dikeman wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:31:41AM -0500, david nicol wrote: there's a letter talking up Lyx in the current issue of Nature Care to type it in for us ? :) http://www.nature.com/, Search for Lyx. Subscription is necessary. Most libraries also carry Nature, and I'd be willing to bet they'd consider flipping the letter's status to 'freebie-from-the-web' if you asked if you could link to it., you're a developer, etc. etc. Brett Here it is! Hope Nature will pardon me for this! Open-source answer to bibliography problem Sir – David M. Leslie and Meredith J. Hamilton say in their Correspondence Multitude of reference styles delays publication (Nature 424, 127; 2003) that a standard format is needed for citation and bibliography styles. The well-established LaTex family of open-source packages is such a system. Many journals in the physical and mathematical sciences provide their bibliographic style files directly on their websites, reducing the problem of format management. Life-sciences journals could easily follow their example. Leslie and Hamilton repeat a familiar objection to LaTeX: the learning curve takes away time from research work. This problem has largely been solved in the form of an open-source graphical interface to LaTeX called LyX (http://www.lyx.org), providing standard functionality such as cut/paste and spell-checking. New users are relieved of the time investment necessary for using LaTeX alone, yet they still derive its well-known performance benefits. The Lyx interface handles standard file formats, most significantly Adobe PDF, which many journals require for electronic submission. It is therefore compatible with other tools used by authors to view, share and submit their written work. Leslie and Hamilton discuss one standardization tool, the digital object identifier (DOI). But although there is substantial incentive for publishers to adopt DOI for increased visibility and accessibility, the benefits of simply changing long-established reference and citation styles are unclear. LaTeX/LyX may represent a more realistic solution. We hope investigators will also consider such open-source applications in the broader context of conducting their scientific work as suggested in your Editorial In praise of open software (Nature 403, 229; 2000; doi:10.1038/35002141). Michael C. Wendl David J. Dooling Genome Sequencing Center, Washington University, Forest Park Boulevard, Box 8501, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA -- :-) ramesh k. sistla The Prayer of India: lOkAh samastAh suKhinO bhavantu -- Let the entire world be in peace!
Re: current issue of Nature
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Brett Dikeman wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:31:41AM -0500, david nicol wrote: there's a letter talking up Lyx in the current issue of Nature Care to type it in for us ? :) http://www.nature.com/, Search for Lyx. Subscription is necessary. Most libraries also carry Nature, and I'd be willing to bet they'd consider flipping the letter's status to 'freebie-from-the-web' if you asked if you could link to it., you're a developer, etc. etc. Brett Here it is! Hope Nature will pardon me for this! Open-source answer to bibliography problem Sir – David M. Leslie and Meredith J. Hamilton say in their Correspondence Multitude of reference styles delays publication (Nature 424, 127; 2003) that a standard format is needed for citation and bibliography styles. The well-established LaTex family of open-source packages is such a system. Many journals in the physical and mathematical sciences provide their bibliographic style files directly on their websites, reducing the problem of format management. Life-sciences journals could easily follow their example. Leslie and Hamilton repeat a familiar objection to LaTeX: the learning curve takes away time from research work. This problem has largely been solved in the form of an open-source graphical interface to LaTeX called LyX (http://www.lyx.org), providing standard functionality such as cut/paste and spell-checking. New users are relieved of the time investment necessary for using LaTeX alone, yet they still derive its well-known performance benefits. The Lyx interface handles standard file formats, most significantly Adobe PDF, which many journals require for electronic submission. It is therefore compatible with other tools used by authors to view, share and submit their written work. Leslie and Hamilton discuss one standardization tool, the digital object identifier (DOI). But although there is substantial incentive for publishers to adopt DOI for increased visibility and accessibility, the benefits of simply changing long-established reference and citation styles are unclear. LaTeX/LyX may represent a more realistic solution. We hope investigators will also consider such open-source applications in the broader context of conducting their scientific work as suggested in your Editorial In praise of open software (Nature 403, 229; 2000; doi:10.1038/35002141). Michael C. Wendl David J. Dooling Genome Sequencing Center, Washington University, Forest Park Boulevard, Box 8501, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA -- :-) ramesh k. sistla The Prayer of India: lOkAh samastAh suKhinO bhavantu -- Let the entire world be in peace!
Re: current issue of Nature
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Brett Dikeman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:31:41AM -0500, david nicol wrote: > > > >> there's a letter talking up Lyx in the current issue of Nature > > > > Care to type it in for us ? :) > > http://www.nature.com/, Search for "Lyx". > > Subscription is necessary. Most libraries also carry Nature, and I'd be > willing to bet they'd consider flipping the letter's status to > 'freebie-from-the-web' if you asked if you could link to it., you're a > developer, etc. etc. > > Brett > Here it is! Hope Nature will pardon me for this! Open-source answer to bibliography problem Sir – David M. Leslie and Meredith J. Hamilton say in their Correspondence "Multitude of reference styles delays publication" (Nature 424, 127; 2003) that a standard format is needed for citation and bibliography styles. The well-established LaTex family of open-source packages is such a system. Many journals in the physical and mathematical sciences provide their bibliographic style files directly on their websites, reducing the problem of format management. Life-sciences journals could easily follow their example. Leslie and Hamilton repeat a familiar objection to LaTeX: the learning curve takes away time from research work. This problem has largely been solved in the form of an open-source graphical interface to LaTeX called LyX (http://www.lyx.org), providing standard functionality such as cut/paste and spell-checking. New users are relieved of the time investment necessary for using LaTeX alone, yet they still derive its well-known performance benefits. The Lyx interface handles standard file formats, most significantly Adobe PDF, which many journals require for electronic submission. It is therefore compatible with other tools used by authors to view, share and submit their written work. Leslie and Hamilton discuss one standardization tool, the digital object identifier (DOI). But although there is substantial incentive for publishers to adopt DOI for increased visibility and accessibility, the benefits of simply changing long-established reference and citation styles are unclear. LaTeX/LyX may represent a more realistic solution. We hope investigators will also consider such open-source applications in the broader context of conducting their scientific work as suggested in your Editorial "In praise of open software" (Nature 403, 229; 2000; doi:10.1038/35002141). Michael C. Wendl & David J. Dooling Genome Sequencing Center, Washington University, Forest Park Boulevard, Box 8501, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA -- :-) ramesh k. sistla The Prayer of India: lOkAh samastAh suKhinO bhavantu -- Let the entire world be in peace!
current issue of Nature
there's a letter talking up Lyx in the current issue of Nature -- David Nicol / If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer. http://gallaghersmash.com
Re: current issue of Nature
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:31:41AM -0500, david nicol wrote: there's a letter talking up Lyx in the current issue of Nature Care to type it in for us ? :) john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
Fwd: [pyblio] open source bibliography [LyX in Nature]
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [pyblio] open source bibliography Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:56:15 -0700 From: Eric Zollars [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pybliographer ML [EMAIL PROTECTED] All- Thought you might be interested. This was published in the most recent issue of Nature. Oddly, the BibTeX format is not mentioned. *Open-source answer to bibliography problem* */Sir/* David M. Leslie and Meredith J. Hamilton say in their Correspondence Multitude of reference styles delays publication that a standard format is needed for citation and bibliography styles. The well-established LaTex family of open-source packages is such a system. Many journals in the physical and mathematical sciences provide their bibliographic style files directly on their websites, reducing the problem of format management. Life-sciences journals could easily follow their example. Leslie and Hamilton repeat a familiar objection to LaTeX: the learning curve takes away time from research work. This problem has largely been solved in the form of an open-source graphical interface to LaTeX called LyX (http://www.lyx.org), providing standard functionality such as cut/paste and spell-checking. New users are relieved of the time investment necessary for using LaTeX alone, yet they still derive its well-known performance benefits. The Lyx interface handles standard file formats, most significantly Adobe PDF, which many journals require for electronic submission. It is therefore compatible with other tools used by authors to view, share and submit their written work. Leslie and Hamilton discuss one standardization tool, the digital object identifier (DOI). But although there is substantial incentive for publishers to adopt DOI for increased visibility and accessibility, the benefits of simply changing long-established reference and citation styles are unclear. LaTeX/LyX may represent a more realistic solution. We hope investigators will also consider such open-source applications in the broader context of conducting their scientific work as suggested in your Editorial In praise of open software *Michael C. Wendl* *David J. Dooling* /Genome Sequencing Center, Washington University, Forest Park Boulevard, Box 8501, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Pybliographer-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pybliographer-general ---
Re: current issue of Nature
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:31:41AM -0500, david nicol wrote: there's a letter talking up Lyx in the current issue of Nature Care to type it in for us ? :) http://www.nature.com/, Search for Lyx. Subscription is necessary. Most libraries also carry Nature, and I'd be willing to bet they'd consider flipping the letter's status to 'freebie-from-the-web' if you asked if you could link to it., you're a developer, etc. etc. Brett
current issue of Nature
there's a letter talking up Lyx in the current issue of Nature -- David Nicol / If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer. http://gallaghersmash.com
Re: current issue of Nature
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:31:41AM -0500, david nicol wrote: there's a letter talking up Lyx in the current issue of Nature Care to type it in for us ? :) john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
Fwd: [pyblio] open source bibliography [LyX in Nature]
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [pyblio] open source bibliography Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:56:15 -0700 From: Eric Zollars [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pybliographer ML [EMAIL PROTECTED] All- Thought you might be interested. This was published in the most recent issue of Nature. Oddly, the BibTeX format is not mentioned. *Open-source answer to bibliography problem* */Sir/* David M. Leslie and Meredith J. Hamilton say in their Correspondence Multitude of reference styles delays publication that a standard format is needed for citation and bibliography styles. The well-established LaTex family of open-source packages is such a system. Many journals in the physical and mathematical sciences provide their bibliographic style files directly on their websites, reducing the problem of format management. Life-sciences journals could easily follow their example. Leslie and Hamilton repeat a familiar objection to LaTeX: the learning curve takes away time from research work. This problem has largely been solved in the form of an open-source graphical interface to LaTeX called LyX (http://www.lyx.org), providing standard functionality such as cut/paste and spell-checking. New users are relieved of the time investment necessary for using LaTeX alone, yet they still derive its well-known performance benefits. The Lyx interface handles standard file formats, most significantly Adobe PDF, which many journals require for electronic submission. It is therefore compatible with other tools used by authors to view, share and submit their written work. Leslie and Hamilton discuss one standardization tool, the digital object identifier (DOI). But although there is substantial incentive for publishers to adopt DOI for increased visibility and accessibility, the benefits of simply changing long-established reference and citation styles are unclear. LaTeX/LyX may represent a more realistic solution. We hope investigators will also consider such open-source applications in the broader context of conducting their scientific work as suggested in your Editorial In praise of open software *Michael C. Wendl* *David J. Dooling* /Genome Sequencing Center, Washington University, Forest Park Boulevard, Box 8501, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Pybliographer-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pybliographer-general ---
Re: current issue of Nature
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:31:41AM -0500, david nicol wrote: there's a letter talking up Lyx in the current issue of Nature Care to type it in for us ? :) http://www.nature.com/, Search for Lyx. Subscription is necessary. Most libraries also carry Nature, and I'd be willing to bet they'd consider flipping the letter's status to 'freebie-from-the-web' if you asked if you could link to it., you're a developer, etc. etc. Brett
current issue of Nature
there's a letter talking up Lyx in the current issue of Nature -- David Nicol / If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer. http://gallaghersmash.com
Re: current issue of Nature
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:31:41AM -0500, david nicol wrote: > there's a letter talking up Lyx in the current issue of Nature Care to type it in for us ? :) john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
Fwd: [pyblio] open source bibliography [LyX in Nature]
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [pyblio] open source bibliography Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:56:15 -0700 From: Eric Zollars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Pybliographer ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> All- Thought you might be interested. This was published in the most recent issue of Nature. Oddly, the BibTeX format is not mentioned. *Open-source answer to bibliography problem* */Sir/* – David M. Leslie and Meredith J. Hamilton say in their Correspondence "Multitude of reference styles delays publication" that a standard format is needed for citation and bibliography styles. The well-established LaTex family of open-source packages is such a system. Many journals in the physical and mathematical sciences provide their bibliographic style files directly on their websites, reducing the problem of format management. Life-sciences journals could easily follow their example. Leslie and Hamilton repeat a familiar objection to LaTeX: the learning curve takes away time from research work. This problem has largely been solved in the form of an open-source graphical interface to LaTeX called LyX (http://www.lyx.org), providing standard functionality such as cut/paste and spell-checking. New users are relieved of the time investment necessary for using LaTeX alone, yet they still derive its well-known performance benefits. The Lyx interface handles standard file formats, most significantly Adobe PDF, which many journals require for electronic submission. It is therefore compatible with other tools used by authors to view, share and submit their written work. Leslie and Hamilton discuss one standardization tool, the digital object identifier (DOI). But although there is substantial incentive for publishers to adopt DOI for increased visibility and accessibility, the benefits of simply changing long-established reference and citation styles are unclear. LaTeX/LyX may represent a more realistic solution. We hope investigators will also consider such open-source applications in the broader context of conducting their scientific work as suggested in your Editorial "In praise of open software" *Michael C. Wendl* & *David J. Dooling* /Genome Sequencing Center, Washington University, Forest Park Boulevard, Box 8501, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Pybliographer-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pybliographer-general ---
Re: current issue of Nature
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:31:41AM -0500, david nicol wrote: > >> there's a letter talking up Lyx in the current issue of Nature > > Care to type it in for us ? :) http://www.nature.com/, Search for "Lyx". Subscription is necessary. Most libraries also carry Nature, and I'd be willing to bet they'd consider flipping the letter's status to 'freebie-from-the-web' if you asked if you could link to it., you're a developer, etc. etc. Brett
