On 12 Jun 2008, G. Milde wrote:
This is not about conversion but display:
* If you paste polytonic Greek text from e.g.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_diacritics, this should show up in
greek letters with diacritics at the correct place.
* If you input latin letters and
On 12 Jun 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> i would like to summarize the my understanding of the problems i encountered,
> please comment on:
>
> 1. Screen painting.
> after installing unicode fonts for X displaying ancient greek letters works
> in lyx
> without problems.
>
[snip]
Not here.
> On 12 Jun 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> > i would like to summarize the my understanding of the problems i
> > encountered,
> > please comment on:
> >
> > 1. Screen painting.
> > after installing unicode fonts for X displaying ancient greek letters works
> > in lyx
> > without problems.
> >
On 12.06.08, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > > Question to the developers: Would it be possible to pass the tilde '~'
> > > > to LaTeX as-is if the language is set to polutonikogreek?
> >
> > > please correct me if i'm wrong, but i think this is wrong direction.
> > > how will you determine nonbreak.
On 12.06.08, Rune Schjellerup Philosof wrote:
> On some keyboard layouts ~ is a dead key by default (danish for instance).
> I wonder why tilde is a dead key on danish keyboards, we don't have any
> chars in our alphabet that use a tilde accent.
The same holds for German.
> I guess someone
On 12.06.08, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> > i would like to summarize the my understanding of the problems i
> > encountered, please comment on:
> >
> > 1. Screen painting.
> > after installing unicode fonts for X displaying ancient greek letters
> > works
On 12 Jun 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > On 12 Jun 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > >
> > > i would like to summarize the my understanding of the problems i
> > > encountered,
> > > please comment on:
> > >
> > > 1. Screen painting.
> > > after installing unicode fonts for X displaying ancient greek
On 12 Jun 2008, G. Milde wrote:
>
> This is not about conversion but display:
>
> * If you paste polytonic Greek text from e.g.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_diacritics, this should show up in
> greek letters with diacritics at the correct place.
>
> * If you input latin letters and
Question to the developers: Would it be possible to pass the tilde '~'
to LaTeX as-is if the language is set to polutonikogreek?
please correct me if i'm wrong, but i think this is wrong direction.
how will you determine nonbreak. space vs tilde accent then?
The same way as
Pavel Sanda skrev:
(or even hard code ~ as a dead key).
On some keyboard layouts ~ is a dead key by default (danish for instance).
My guess is that people, who wish to write greek, use such a keyboard
layout (or changes to one).
I wonder why tilde is a dead key on danish keyboards, we
Question to the developers: Would it be possible to pass the tilde '~'
to LaTeX as-is if the language is set to polutonikogreek?
please correct me if i'm wrong, but i think this is wrong direction.
how will you determine nonbreak. space vs tilde accent then?
The same way as
Pavel Sanda skrev:
(or even hard code ~ as a dead key).
On some keyboard layouts ~ is a dead key by default (danish for instance).
My guess is that people, who wish to write greek, use such a keyboard
layout (or changes to one).
I wonder why tilde is a dead key on danish keyboards, we
> > > Question to the developers: Would it be possible to pass the tilde '~'
> > > to LaTeX as-is if the language is set to polutonikogreek?
>
> > please correct me if i'm wrong, but i think this is wrong direction.
> > how will you determine nonbreak. space vs tilde accent then?
>
> The same
Pavel Sanda skrev:
(or even hard code ~ as a dead key).
On some keyboard layouts ~ is a dead key by default (danish for instance).
My guess is that people, who wish to write greek, use such a keyboard
layout (or changes to one).
I wonder why tilde is a dead key on danish keyboards, we
Bo,
thanks for your responses.
- was there some conclusion about filename extension? if there are going
to be
any tricks with copying or moving .lyx file itself i smell thousand and
one
problems of rewrites, bad deletions on user side etc. i think that some
.lyz
would be
Bo,
agh, sorry wrong list :(
pavel
Bo,
thanks for your responses.
- was there some conclusion about filename extension? if there are going
to be
any tricks with copying or moving .lyx file itself i smell thousand and
one
problems of rewrites, bad deletions on user side etc. i think that some
.lyz
would be
Bo,
agh, sorry wrong list :(
pavel
Bo,
thanks for your responses.
> > - was there some conclusion about filename extension? if there are going
> > to be
> > any tricks with copying or moving .lyx file itself i smell thousand and
> > one
> > problems of rewrites, bad deletions on user side etc. i think that some
> > .lyz
> Bo,
>
agh, sorry wrong list :(
pavel
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William R. Buckley schrieb:
Interesting to me is
that Andre Pönitz vociferously and rudely suggested to me
that the problem must be resident in Window, the OS.
As somebody who has enjoyed the ``André experience'', describing him
as 'vociferous' is
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William R. Buckley schrieb:
Interesting to me is
that Andre Pönitz vociferously and rudely suggested to me
that the problem must be resident in Window, the OS.
As somebody who has enjoyed the ``André experience'', describing him
as 'vociferous' is
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> William R. Buckley schrieb:
>>> Interesting to me is
>>> that Andre Pönitz vociferously and rudely suggested to me
>>> that the problem must be resident in Window, the OS.
As somebody who has enjoyed the ``André experience'', describing him
as
William R. Buckley schrieb:
On this point, you and I strongly disagree. There are many
times when a document could benefit by the use of more
than one font. I can send you example documents which
do use several fonts, and would be difficult to fathom if only
one font were used.
You mix
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
You mix fonts and font shapes.
It seems a very common misconception. Too many people use the word 'font'
when they refer to 'typeface.' A 'font' is a particular typeface (Palatino,
Amerigo, Bookman), shape (Roman, Slant, Italic), weight (normal, bold,
Rich Shepard wrote:
It seems a very common misconception. Too many people use the word 'font'
when they refer to 'typeface.' A 'font' is a particular typeface
(Palatino, Amerigo, Bookman), shape (Roman, Slant, Italic), weight
(normal, bold, thin), and size (10pt, 11pt, 12pt). That's why
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
(or found, for traditionalists)
I feel the traditionalists attacking. Of course, it's spelled fount.
Jürgen
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:57:55AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
William R. Buckley schrieb:
Interesting to me is
that Andre Pönitz vociferously and rudely suggested to me
that the problem must be resident in Window, the OS.
Are you refering to
William R. Buckley schrieb:
For instance, consider the attached paper, which includes
many different fonts.
I should add that this paper has been published.
This is no excuse ;-), I have read books, written in Word and directly
published.
One font is not always a desirable condition.
William R. Buckley schrieb:
Telling me, even suggesting to me, how I should react to the
written words of others is rude.
The telling is what is rude.
You treated me rudely when you suggested how I should be
affected by the written words of others.
What, it is rude that I said you shouldn't
William R. Buckley schrieb:
On this point, you and I strongly disagree. There are many
times when a document could benefit by the use of more
than one font. I can send you example documents which
do use several fonts, and would be difficult to fathom if only
one font were used.
You mix
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
You mix fonts and font shapes.
It seems a very common misconception. Too many people use the word 'font'
when they refer to 'typeface.' A 'font' is a particular typeface (Palatino,
Amerigo, Bookman), shape (Roman, Slant, Italic), weight (normal, bold,
Rich Shepard wrote:
It seems a very common misconception. Too many people use the word 'font'
when they refer to 'typeface.' A 'font' is a particular typeface
(Palatino, Amerigo, Bookman), shape (Roman, Slant, Italic), weight
(normal, bold, thin), and size (10pt, 11pt, 12pt). That's why
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
(or found, for traditionalists)
I feel the traditionalists attacking. Of course, it's spelled fount.
Jürgen
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:57:55AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
William R. Buckley schrieb:
Interesting to me is
that Andre Pönitz vociferously and rudely suggested to me
that the problem must be resident in Window, the OS.
Are you refering to
William R. Buckley schrieb:
For instance, consider the attached paper, which includes
many different fonts.
I should add that this paper has been published.
This is no excuse ;-), I have read books, written in Word and directly
published.
One font is not always a desirable condition.
William R. Buckley schrieb:
Telling me, even suggesting to me, how I should react to the
written words of others is rude.
The telling is what is rude.
You treated me rudely when you suggested how I should be
affected by the written words of others.
What, it is rude that I said you shouldn't
William R. Buckley schrieb:
On this point, you and I strongly disagree. There are many
times when a document could benefit by the use of more
than one font. I can send you example documents which
do use several fonts, and would be difficult to fathom if only
one font were used.
You mix
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
You mix "fonts" and "font shapes".
It seems a very common misconception. Too many people use the word 'font'
when they refer to 'typeface.' A 'font' is a particular typeface (Palatino,
Amerigo, Bookman), shape (Roman, Slant, Italic), weight (normal,
Rich Shepard wrote:
> It seems a very common misconception. Too many people use the word 'font'
> when they refer to 'typeface.' A 'font' is a particular typeface
> (Palatino, Amerigo, Bookman), shape (Roman, Slant, Italic), weight
> (normal, bold, thin), and size (10pt, 11pt, 12pt). That's why
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> (or found, for traditionalists)
I feel the traditionalists attacking. Of course, it's spelled "fount".
Jürgen
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:57:55AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> William R. Buckley schrieb:
>> Interesting to me is
>> that Andre Pönitz vociferously and rudely suggested to me
>> that the problem must be resident in Window, the OS.
Are you refering to
William R. Buckley schrieb:
For instance, consider the attached paper, which includes
many different fonts.
I should add that this paper has been published.
This is no excuse ;-), I have read books, written in Word and directly
published.
One font is not always a desirable condition.
>
William R. Buckley schrieb:
Telling me, even suggesting to me, how I should react to the
written words of others is rude.
The telling is what is rude.
> You treated me rudely when you suggested how I should be
> affected by the written words of others.
What, it is rude that I said you
William R. Buckley schrieb:
I have learned from where most of the text formatting is controlled,
and it is surprisingly easy. Don't understand why I can't there also
find *strikeout* among the forms.
Because the LateX-packages that support this are not yet ready for Unicode (non latin)
William R. Buckley schrieb:
I have learned from where most of the text formatting is controlled,
and it is surprisingly easy. Don't understand why I can't there also
find *strikeout* among the forms.
Because the LateX-packages that support this are not yet ready for Unicode (non latin)
William R. Buckley schrieb:
I have learned from where most of the text formatting is controlled,
and it is surprisingly easy. Don't understand why I can't there also
find *strikeout* among the forms.
Because the LateX-packages that support this are not yet ready for Unicode (non latin)
First, I vote for LICK.
If the goal is to be a TeX product, then extend the language, and
avoid the sound of plurality,
Second, I think LyX has a wonderful potential, and a magnificently
executed actual.
I have learned from where most of the text formatting is controlled,
and it is surprisingly
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:15:13AM -0700, William R. Buckley wrote:
Hi Francis.
First, I vote for LICK.
Usually the right of naming a child belongs to the parents, so I really
wonder why _this_ discussion pops up every second year or so...
Andre'
PS: I surely forgot one or two of those
First, I vote for LICK.
If the goal is to be a TeX product, then extend the language, and
avoid the sound of plurality,
Second, I think LyX has a wonderful potential, and a magnificently
executed actual.
I have learned from where most of the text formatting is controlled,
and it is surprisingly
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:15:13AM -0700, William R. Buckley wrote:
Hi Francis.
First, I vote for LICK.
Usually the right of naming a child belongs to the parents, so I really
wonder why _this_ discussion pops up every second year or so...
Andre'
PS: I surely forgot one or two of those
First, I vote for LICK.
If the goal is to be a TeX product, then extend the language, and
avoid the sound of plurality,
Second, I think LyX has a wonderful potential, and a magnificently
executed actual.
I have learned from where most of the text formatting is controlled,
and it is surprisingly
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:15:13AM -0700, William R. Buckley wrote:
Hi Francis.
> First, I vote for LICK.
Usually the right of naming a child belongs to the parents, so I really
wonder why _this_ discussion pops up every second year or so...
Andre'
PS: I surely forgot one or two of those
Hello, everyone,
I just want to sum the solutions for numbering equations. And I don't
know whether somebody had posted the same before the mail. If others
have done this, please cancel this mail ^_^!
Before sending my mail on the numbering problem, I searched the help
file, and the LyX
Hello, everyone,
I just want to sum the solutions for numbering equations. And I don't
know whether somebody had posted the same before the mail. If others
have done this, please cancel this mail ^_^!
Before sending my mail on the numbering problem, I searched the help
file, and the LyX
Hello, everyone,
I just want to sum the solutions for numbering equations. And I don't
know whether somebody had posted the same before the mail. If others
have done this, please cancel this mail ^_^!
Before sending my mail on the numbering problem, I searched the help
file, and the LyX
Hi,
I did not read the thread but using
Geoffrey Lloyd schrieb:
\usepackage{palatino}
outdated since 2001. use
\usepackage{mathpazo}
(or even better \usepackage[sc]{mathpazo} if your latex is new enough)
for better math support (and better \textsc output).
See
Hi,
I did not read the thread but using
Geoffrey Lloyd schrieb:
\usepackage{palatino}
outdated since 2001. use
\usepackage{mathpazo}
(or even better \usepackage[sc]{mathpazo} if your latex is new enough)
for better math support (and better \textsc output).
See
Hi,
I did not read the thread but using
Geoffrey Lloyd schrieb:
\usepackage{palatino}
outdated since 2001. use
\usepackage{mathpazo}
(or even better \usepackage[sc]{mathpazo} if your latex is new enough)
for better math support (and better \textsc output).
See
Ok I know it is bad to start a new thread but I
think a number of things need to be listed so that people (me included) aren't
confused.
I am using
\usepackage{palatino}
This provides Type 1 (non-bitmap)
fonts.
The dvi file is perfect-to create the
dvi it makes its fonts from .vf and
On Aug 12, 2005, at 7:57 AM, Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
Ok I know it is bad to start a new thread but I think a number of
things need to be listed so that people (me included) aren't confused.
I am using
\usepackage{palatino}
This provides Type 1 (non-bitmap) fonts.
The dvi file is perfect
Ok I know it is bad to start a new thread but I
think a number of things need to be listed so that people (me included) aren't
confused.
I am using
\usepackage{palatino}
This provides Type 1 (non-bitmap)
fonts.
The dvi file is perfect-to create the
dvi it makes its fonts from .vf and
On Aug 12, 2005, at 7:57 AM, Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
Ok I know it is bad to start a new thread but I think a number of
things need to be listed so that people (me included) aren't confused.
I am using
\usepackage{palatino}
This provides Type 1 (non-bitmap) fonts.
The dvi file is perfect
Ok I know it is bad to start a new thread but I
think a number of things need to be listed so that people (me included) aren't
confused.
I am using
\usepackage{palatino}
This provides Type 1 (non-bitmap)
fonts.
The dvi file is perfect - to create the
dvi it makes its fonts from .vf
On Aug 12, 2005, at 7:57 AM, Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
Ok I know it is bad to start a new thread but I think a number of
things need to be listed so that people (me included) aren't confused.
I am using
\usepackage{palatino}
This provides Type 1 (non-bitmap) fonts.
The dvi file is perfect
The original question was how to use avant font in the equations.
The problem is solved:
I a Linux Debian Sarge I do:
1) Download sansmath.sty from:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/misc/
2) With then command kpsepath tex you get the paths, where TeX search for
files. I
The original question was how to use avant font in the equations.
The problem is solved:
I a Linux Debian Sarge I do:
1) Download sansmath.sty from:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/misc/
2) With then command kpsepath tex you get the paths, where TeX search for
files. I
The original question was how to use avant font in the equations.
The problem is solved:
I a Linux Debian Sarge I do:
1) Download "sansmath.sty" from:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/misc/
2) With then command "kpsepath tex" you get the paths, where TeX search for
files.
I'm writing a White Paper and would like to rename the Abstract to
Executive Summary. Would I use '\renewcommand{Abstract}#{Executive
Summary}' or something else?
Also, would the article or report class be more appropriate for such a
document?
TIA,
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Rich Shepard wrote:
RS I'm writing a White Paper and would like to rename the Abstract to
RS Executive Summary. Would I use '\renewcommand{Abstract}#{Executive
RS Summary}' or something else?
RS
RS Also, would the article or report class be more appropriate for such
RS
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Henrik Edlund wrote:
I seem to remember I answered this question for you months ago on this
list? Must be in the archives.
Hmmm-m-m. I don't recall asking it before, but I'll go look in the
archives.
Thanks,
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
Applied Ecosystem
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Henrik Edlund wrote:
I seem to remember I answered this question for you months ago on this
list? Must be in the archives.
My sincere apologies, Henrik. You did -- and so did others who helped me
to understand that the \renewcommand needed to be in a standard paragraph
I'm writing a White Paper and would like to rename the Abstract to
Executive Summary. Would I use '\renewcommand{Abstract}#{Executive
Summary}' or something else?
Also, would the article or report class be more appropriate for such a
document?
TIA,
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Rich Shepard wrote:
RS I'm writing a White Paper and would like to rename the Abstract to
RS Executive Summary. Would I use '\renewcommand{Abstract}#{Executive
RS Summary}' or something else?
RS
RS Also, would the article or report class be more appropriate for such
RS
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Henrik Edlund wrote:
I seem to remember I answered this question for you months ago on this
list? Must be in the archives.
Hmmm-m-m. I don't recall asking it before, but I'll go look in the
archives.
Thanks,
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
Applied Ecosystem
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Henrik Edlund wrote:
I seem to remember I answered this question for you months ago on this
list? Must be in the archives.
My sincere apologies, Henrik. You did -- and so did others who helped me
to understand that the \renewcommand needed to be in a standard paragraph
I'm writing a White Paper and would like to rename the "Abstract" to
"Executive Summary". Would I use '\renewcommand{Abstract}#{Executive
Summary}' or something else?
Also, would the article or report class be more appropriate for such a
document?
TIA,
Rich
--
Dr
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Rich Shepard wrote:
RS> I'm writing a White Paper and would like to rename the "Abstract" to
RS> "Executive Summary". Would I use '\renewcommand{Abstract}#{Executive
RS> Summary}' or something else?
RS>
RS> Also, would the article
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Henrik Edlund wrote:
> I seem to remember I answered this question for you months ago on this
> list? Must be in the archives.
Hmmm-m-m. I don't recall asking it before, but I'll go look in the
archives.
Thanks,
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
Applied
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Henrik Edlund wrote:
> I seem to remember I answered this question for you months ago on this
> list? Must be in the archives.
My sincere apologies, Henrik. You did -- and so did others who helped me
to understand that the \renewcommand needed to be in a standard paragraph
Hi everybody, How can I change name Summary for Index and How can
I control fonts and spacing on it.
Thanks, Alexandre Gonalves Jacarand
--
clarkagjcris
Hi everybody, How can I change name Summary for Index and How can
I control fonts and spacing on it.
Thanks, Alexandre Gonalves Jacarand
--
clarkagjcris
Hi everybody, How can I change name Summary for Index and How can
I control fonts and spacing on it.
Thanks, Alexandre Gonçalves Jacarandá
--
clarkagjcris
101 - 183 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
