Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:37:51AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Pavel Sanda updating the VCS stuff for 1.6 so that it will use cvs,
svn, or git.
I don't think Pavel put git support in... But I seem to remember he has
it on a private _git_ branch ;-)
Pavel Sanda wrote:
I would think so. The main git repo could be easily hosted in a number of
locations.
whats the improvement over svn?
Cloning a git repository is as easy as a snap and we wouldn't need to
maintain an svn server that goes down every month.
Abdel.
Pavel Sanda wrote:
I would think so. The main git repo could be easily hosted in a number of
locations.
whats the improvement over svn?
Cloning a git repository is as easy as a snap and we wouldn't need to
maintain an svn server that goes down every month.
i fail to see why this is a
I would think so. The main git repo could be easily hosted in a number of
locations.
whats the improvement over svn?
pavel
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:37:51AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Pavel Sanda updating the VCS stuff for 1.6 so that it will use cvs,
svn, or git.
I don't think Pavel put git support in... But I seem to remember he has
it on a private _git_ branch ;-)
Pavel Sanda wrote:
I would think so. The main git repo could be easily hosted in a number of
locations.
whats the improvement over svn?
Cloning a git repository is as easy as a snap and we wouldn't need to
maintain an svn server that goes down every month.
Abdel.
Pavel Sanda wrote:
I would think so. The main git repo could be easily hosted in a number of
locations.
whats the improvement over svn?
Cloning a git repository is as easy as a snap and we wouldn't need to
maintain an svn server that goes down every month.
i fail to see why this is a
I would think so. The main git repo could be easily hosted in a number of
locations.
whats the improvement over svn?
pavel
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:37:51AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Pavel Sanda updating the VCS stuff for 1.6 so that it will use cvs,
svn, or git.
I don't think Pavel put git support in... But I seem to remember he has
it on a private _git_ branch ;-)
Pavel Sanda wrote:
I would think so. The main git repo could be easily hosted in a number of
locations.
whats the improvement over svn?
Cloning a git repository is as easy as a snap and we wouldn't need to
maintain an svn server that goes down every month.
Abdel.
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> I would think so. The main git repo could be easily hosted in a number of
>>> locations.
>> whats the improvement over svn?
>
> Cloning a git repository is as easy as a snap and we wouldn't need to
> maintain an svn server that goes down every month.
i fail to see why
> I would think so. The main git repo could be easily hosted in a number of
> locations.
whats the improvement over svn?
pavel
2008/12/8 Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AFAIR, TortoiseSVN and command-line 'svn' client are fully interoperable.
Has to. As it uses the same underlying library code.
And it is true, that Tortoise is not enough.
--
Manveru
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gg: 1624001
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:37:51AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Pavel Sanda updating the VCS stuff for 1.6 so that it will use cvs,
svn, or git.
I don't think Pavel put git support in... But I seem to remember he has
it on a private _git_ branch ;-)
Incidentally, would switching to git
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:37:51AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Pavel Sanda updating the VCS stuff for 1.6 so that it will use cvs,
svn, or git.
I don't think Pavel put git support in... But I seem to remember he has
it on a private _git_ branch ;-)
Incidentally, would
2008/12/8 Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AFAIR, TortoiseSVN and command-line 'svn' client are fully interoperable.
Has to. As it uses the same underlying library code.
And it is true, that Tortoise is not enough.
--
Manveru
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gg: 1624001
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:37:51AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Pavel Sanda updating the VCS stuff for 1.6 so that it will use cvs,
svn, or git.
I don't think Pavel put git support in... But I seem to remember he has
it on a private _git_ branch ;-)
Incidentally, would switching to git
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:37:51AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Pavel Sanda updating the VCS stuff for 1.6 so that it will use cvs,
svn, or git.
I don't think Pavel put git support in... But I seem to remember he has
it on a private _git_ branch ;-)
Incidentally, would
2008/12/8 Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> AFAIR, TortoiseSVN and command-line 'svn' client are fully interoperable.
>
Has to. As it uses the same underlying library code.
And it is true, that Tortoise is not enough.
--
Manveru
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gg: 1624001
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:37:51AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Pavel Sanda updating the VCS stuff for 1.6 so that it will use cvs,
>> svn, or git.
>
> I don't think Pavel put git support in... But I seem to remember he has
> it on a private _git_ branch ;-)
Incidentally, would switching
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:37:51AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Pavel Sanda updating the VCS stuff for 1.6 so that it will use cvs,
> >> svn, or git.
> >
> > I don't think Pavel put git support in... But I seem to remember he has
> > it on a private _git_ branch ;-)
>
> Incidentally,
Does the versionmanagement thing work for anyone under windows and lyx 1.6?
i cannot check in anything. it complains that some command line operation
failed that was calling some ci function. whatever that is.
cheers,
niko
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Niko Schwarz wrote:
Does the versionmanagement thing work for anyone under windows and lyx 1.6?
i cannot check in anything. it complains that some command line operation
failed that was calling some ci function. whatever that is.
cheers,
It requires
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Niko Schwarz wrote:
Does the versionmanagement thing work for anyone under windows and lyx 1.6?
i cannot check in anything. it complains that some command line operation
failed that was calling some ci function. whatever that is.
rgheck wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Niko Schwarz wrote:
Does the versionmanagement thing work for anyone under windows and
lyx 1.6?
i cannot check in anything. it complains that some command line
operation
failed that was calling some ci function.
Does the versionmanagement thing work for anyone under windows and lyx 1.6?
i cannot check in anything. it complains that some command line operation
failed that was calling some ci function. whatever that is.
cheers,
niko
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Niko Schwarz wrote:
Does the versionmanagement thing work for anyone under windows and lyx 1.6?
i cannot check in anything. it complains that some command line operation
failed that was calling some ci function. whatever that is.
cheers,
It requires
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Niko Schwarz wrote:
Does the versionmanagement thing work for anyone under windows and lyx 1.6?
i cannot check in anything. it complains that some command line operation
failed that was calling some ci function. whatever that is.
rgheck wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Niko Schwarz wrote:
Does the versionmanagement thing work for anyone under windows and
lyx 1.6?
i cannot check in anything. it complains that some command line
operation
failed that was calling some ci function.
Does the versionmanagement thing work for anyone under windows and lyx 1.6?
i cannot check in anything. it complains that some command line operation
failed that was calling some "ci" function. whatever that is.
cheers,
niko
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Niko Schwarz wrote:
> Does the versionmanagement thing work for anyone under windows and lyx 1.6?
> i cannot check in anything. it complains that some command line operation
> failed that was calling some "ci" function. whatever that is.
> cheers,
It
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Niko Schwarz wrote:
Does the versionmanagement thing work for anyone under windows and lyx 1.6?
i cannot check in anything. it complains that some command line operation
failed that was calling some "ci" function. whatever that
rgheck wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Niko Schwarz wrote:
Does the versionmanagement thing work for anyone under windows and
lyx 1.6?
i cannot check in anything. it complains that some command line
operation
failed that was calling some "ci" function.
33 matches
Mail list logo
