Re: +/- in a table too large

What I see here from those few responses different TeX distros have different implementation (if I can tell that) of Latin Modern typefaces in details. Very strange. The question we have here now is which distributions are fine by default, and which may need some additional tweaks to get math

Re: +/- in a table too large

On 21.05.08, Manveru wrote: What I see here from those few responses different TeX distros have different implementation (if I can tell that) of Latin Modern typefaces in details. Very strange. To me it looks rather like a font substitution -- some font missing in some disttributions or older

Re: +/- in a table too large

-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -- Subject: Re: +/- in a table too large Date: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 08:15 From: Wolfgang Engelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 20:52 schrieben Sie: Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: thanks

Re: +/- in a table too large

Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 08:05 schrieb G. Milde: On 21.05.08, Manveru wrote: What I see here from those few responses different TeX distros have different implementation (if I can tell that) of Latin Modern typefaces in details. Very strange. To me it looks rather like a font

Re: +/- in a table too large

What I see here from those few responses different TeX distros have different implementation (if I can tell that) of Latin Modern typefaces in details. Very strange. The question we have here now is which distributions are fine by default, and which may need some additional tweaks to get math

Re: +/- in a table too large

On 21.05.08, Manveru wrote: What I see here from those few responses different TeX distros have different implementation (if I can tell that) of Latin Modern typefaces in details. Very strange. To me it looks rather like a font substitution -- some font missing in some disttributions or older

Re: +/- in a table too large

-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -- Subject: Re: +/- in a table too large Date: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 08:15 From: Wolfgang Engelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 20:52 schrieben Sie: Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: thanks

Re: +/- in a table too large

Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 08:05 schrieb G. Milde: On 21.05.08, Manveru wrote: What I see here from those few responses different TeX distros have different implementation (if I can tell that) of Latin Modern typefaces in details. Very strange. To me it looks rather like a font

Re: +/- in a table too large

What I see here from those few responses different TeX distros have different implementation (if I can tell that) of Latin Modern typefaces in details. Very strange. The question we have here now is which distributions are fine by default, and which may need some additional tweaks to get math

Re: +/- in a table too large

On 21.05.08, Manveru wrote: > What I see here from those few responses different TeX distros have > different implementation (if I can tell that) of Latin Modern typefaces in > details. Very strange. To me it looks rather like a font substitution -- some font missing in some disttributions or

Re: +/- in a table too large

-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -- Subject: Re: +/- in a table too large Date: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 08:15 From: Wolfgang Engelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paul A. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 20:52 schrieben Sie: > Wolfgang En

Re: +/- in a table too large

Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 08:05 schrieb G. Milde: > On 21.05.08, Manveru wrote: > > What I see here from those few responses different TeX distros have > > different implementation (if I can tell that) of Latin Modern typefaces > > in details. Very strange. > > To me it looks rather like a font

+/- in a table too large

Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it? Wolfgang attachment: tabelle-lyx.jpg

Re: +/- in a table too large

Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it? Wolfgang I just noticed that the same (too

Re: +/- in a table too large

The typeface is suspected. Some symbols are joined from two characters when selected typeface has not correct glyph in the set. Are you using any alternative font settings in your document? What text size is chosen? 2008/5/20 Wolfgang Engelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51

Re: +/- in a table too large

Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it? Wolfgang I just

Re: +/- in a table too large

: +/- in a table too large Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it? Wolfgang

Re: +/- in a table too large

Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 14:40 schrieb Paul A. Rubin: Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use

Re: +/- in a table too large

Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: thanks for the various responses. Here is a minimal example Have a look at the document settings. I can´t see any strange things there, and the error stays after taking out the preamble entrances Wolfgang This might be a repost -- I tried to post a response but

Re: +/- in a table too large

:12:16 PM Subject: Re: +/- in a table too large Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: thanks for the various responses. Here is a minimal example Have a look at the document settings. I can´t see any strange things there, and the error stays after taking out the preamble entrances Wolfgang

Re: +/- in a table too large

On Tuesday 20 May 2008 12:36:01 pm Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Have a look at the document settings. I can´t see any strange things there, and the error stays after taking out the preamble entrances I can see exactly what you are talking about. The +/- symbol appears too large. But only if you

+/- in a table too large

Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it? Wolfgang attachment: tabelle-lyx.jpg

Re: +/- in a table too large

Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it? Wolfgang I just noticed that the same (too

Re: +/- in a table too large

The typeface is suspected. Some symbols are joined from two characters when selected typeface has not correct glyph in the set. Are you using any alternative font settings in your document? What text size is chosen? 2008/5/20 Wolfgang Engelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51

Re: +/- in a table too large

Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it? Wolfgang I just

Re: +/- in a table too large

: +/- in a table too large Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it? Wolfgang

Re: +/- in a table too large

Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 14:40 schrieb Paul A. Rubin: Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use

Re: +/- in a table too large

Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: thanks for the various responses. Here is a minimal example Have a look at the document settings. I can´t see any strange things there, and the error stays after taking out the preamble entrances Wolfgang This might be a repost -- I tried to post a response but

Re: +/- in a table too large

:12:16 PM Subject: Re: +/- in a table too large Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: thanks for the various responses. Here is a minimal example Have a look at the document settings. I can´t see any strange things there, and the error stays after taking out the preamble entrances Wolfgang

Re: +/- in a table too large

On Tuesday 20 May 2008 12:36:01 pm Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Have a look at the document settings. I can´t see any strange things there, and the error stays after taking out the preamble entrances I can see exactly what you are talking about. The +/- symbol appears too large. But only if you

+/- in a table too large

Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it? Wolfgang <>

Re: +/- in a table too large

Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: > Again a question: > in a table is in math mode e.g. > 50.9\pm1.3 > the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) > is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it? > > Wolfgang I just noticed that the

Re: +/- in a table too large

The typeface is suspected. Some symbols are joined from two characters when selected typeface has not correct glyph in the set. Are you using any alternative font settings in your document? What text size is chosen? 2008/5/20 Wolfgang Engelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008

Re: +/- in a table too large

Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it? Wolfgang I just

Re: +/- in a table too large

6 AM Subject: +/- in a table too large Again a question: in a table is in math mode e.g. 50.9\pm1.3 the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it? Wolfgang

Re: +/- in a table too large

Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 14:40 schrieb Paul A. Rubin: > Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: > >> Again a question: > >> in a table is in math mode e.g. > >> 50.9\pm1.3 > >> the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix) > >> is this a

Re: +/- in a table too large

Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: thanks for the various responses. Here is a minimal example Have a look at the document settings. I can´t see any strange things there, and the error stays after taking out the preamble entrances Wolfgang This might be a repost -- I tried to post a response but

Re: +/- in a table too large

2008 4:12:16 PM Subject: Re: +/- in a table too large Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > thanks for the various responses. Here is a minimal example > > Have a look at the document settings. I can´t see any strange things there, > and the error stays after taking out the preamble en

Re: +/- in a table too large

On Tuesday 20 May 2008 12:36:01 pm Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > Have a look at the document settings. I can´t see any strange things there, > and the error stays after taking out the preamble entrances I can see exactly what you are talking about. The +/- symbol appears too large. But only if