Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

 "Raymond" == Raymond E Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Raymond Fixed!!!  And many thanks to JMarc for patience.  I had
Raymond gotten a libc.so.5 form of libforms.so.0.88 mixed into my
Raymond system.  A diagnostic approach that would have worked is.

Ah! I knew it from the beginning :)

JMarc



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

 "Raymond" == Raymond E Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Raymond Fixed!!!  And many thanks to JMarc for patience.  I had
Raymond gotten a libc.so.5 form of libforms.so.0.88 mixed into my
Raymond system.  A diagnostic approach that would have worked is.

Ah! I knew it from the beginning :)

JMarc



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

> "Raymond" == Raymond E Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Raymond> Fixed!!!  And many thanks to JMarc for patience.  I had
Raymond> gotten a libc.so.5 form of libforms.so.0.88 mixed into my
Raymond> system.  A diagnostic approach that would have worked is.

Ah! I knew it from the beginning :)

JMarc



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

 "Raymond" == Raymond E Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Raymond One more time into the breach dear friends.  I have
Raymond spontaniously (well I did a libstdc++ upgrade from SuSE and
Raymond some other upgrades) broken my lyx and can't seem to get it
Raymond back. It can't find files it wants in /tmp or (if \use_tmpdir
Raymond false) even my home directory.

Raymond I have tried several lyx binaries and recompiles.  I keep
Raymond getting the erronious linkage (?): ldd lyx- libc.6.so
Raymond libc.5.so This was purported to come from xforms but I have
Raymond installed (I think) the clean xforms.  If someone will help
Raymond me troubleshoot the system; I will try to put together a
Raymond troubleshooting script.  I tried the archive but I didn't
Raymond seem to find a clear answer.  I don't know how bad a shape my
Raymond system is in now; I tried a lot of things!  I have a lot of
Raymond lyx bin and source files laying around.  Help would be
Raymond appreciated.

Hello,

Try to get the xforms rpm from
ftp://moni.msci.memphis.edu/pub. Although it has the same name than
the one from redhat and possibly suse, it actually uses libc6. You
will probably have to uninstall the old one first.

JMarc



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-17 Thread Raymond E. Rogers Sr.

Hi
I believe that is the one I am obtained and am using.  I am down
loading it (again?) and will try to install in tonight.  I will record
that rpm expansion.  I am not too familiar with rpm so I might have missed
something important (such as it not installing).  The forms.h it put in
place (?) has a date stamp of Jan 1998 and a FL_VERSION of 0; so I might
have failed to actually get it in.  I also have some problems with the new
binary Xfroms; they want tetex-latex and GLIBC_6_1 or some such that SuSE
doesn't seem to have.  I don't know if this matters. 
My compiles have similiar problems.

Ray

  
 Hello,
 
 Try to get the xforms rpm from
 ftp://moni.msci.memphis.edu/pub. Although it has the same name than
 the one from redhat and possibly suse, it actually uses libc6. You
 will probably have to uninstall the old one first.
 
 JMarc
 



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

 "Raymond" == Raymond E Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Raymond Hi I believe that is the one I am obtained and am using.  I
Raymond am down loading it (again?) and will try to install in
Raymond tonight.  I will record that rpm expansion.  I am not too
Raymond familiar with rpm so I might have missed something important
Raymond (such as it not installing).  The forms.h it put in place (?)
Raymond has a date stamp of Jan 1998 and a FL_VERSION of 0; so I
Raymond might have failed to actually get it in.  I also have some
Raymond problems with the new binary Xfroms; they want tetex-latex
Raymond and GLIBC_6_1 or some such that SuSE doesn't seem to have.  I
Raymond don't know if this matters.  My compiles have similiar
Raymond problems.

I know nothing about the glibc2.1 or Suse things. However, what I
would try to do is
  rpm -e xforms
to remove the old xforms installation, and then
  rpm -i xforms-0.88-2.i386.rpm
to install the new one. The problem is that, since the version numbers
of the rpms clash, the rpm tool might decide that update is not
necessary.

As far as version is concerned, you can use
  rpm -qi xforms
to see the date of packaging of the different rpms.

Hope this helps.

JMarc



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-17 Thread Raymond E. Rogers

Hi
I will do what you say and send the results to you (JMarc) tonight.  I
will also show you 6.1 requirements from the binaries I obtained.  Would
it be better to send the logs to you directly or to the list?  I
_believe_ in debugging scripts and logs; it is too easy to
misscommunicate when people (including myself) describe what happens.  I
learned this fact long ago when I was an electronics tech in the Navy;
even the most highly trained people would make
mistakes/misrepresentation/oversights when trying to describe problems. 
I found out that I did as well.
BTW: did you know that your email is reaching me twice?

Ray



Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

 
 I know nothing about the glibc2.1 or Suse things. However, what I
 would try to do is
   rpm -e xforms
 to remove the old xforms installation, and then
   rpm -i xforms-0.88-2.i386.rpm
 to install the new one. The problem is that, since the version numbers
 of the rpms clash, the rpm tool might decide that update is not
 necessary.
 
 As far as version is concerned, you can use
   rpm -qi xforms
 to see the date of packaging of the different rpms.
 
 Hope this helps.
 
 JMarc



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

 "Raymond" == Raymond E Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Raymond One more time into the breach dear friends.  I have
Raymond spontaniously (well I did a libstdc++ upgrade from SuSE and
Raymond some other upgrades) broken my lyx and can't seem to get it
Raymond back. It can't find files it wants in /tmp or (if \use_tmpdir
Raymond false) even my home directory.

Raymond I have tried several lyx binaries and recompiles.  I keep
Raymond getting the erronious linkage (?): ldd lyx- libc.6.so
Raymond libc.5.so This was purported to come from xforms but I have
Raymond installed (I think) the clean xforms.  If someone will help
Raymond me troubleshoot the system; I will try to put together a
Raymond troubleshooting script.  I tried the archive but I didn't
Raymond seem to find a clear answer.  I don't know how bad a shape my
Raymond system is in now; I tried a lot of things!  I have a lot of
Raymond lyx bin and source files laying around.  Help would be
Raymond appreciated.

Hello,

Try to get the xforms rpm from
ftp://moni.msci.memphis.edu/pub. Although it has the same name than
the one from redhat and possibly suse, it actually uses libc6. You
will probably have to uninstall the old one first.

JMarc



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-17 Thread Raymond E. Rogers Sr.

Hi
I believe that is the one I am obtained and am using.  I am down
loading it (again?) and will try to install in tonight.  I will record
that rpm expansion.  I am not too familiar with rpm so I might have missed
something important (such as it not installing).  The forms.h it put in
place (?) has a date stamp of Jan 1998 and a FL_VERSION of 0; so I might
have failed to actually get it in.  I also have some problems with the new
binary Xfroms; they want tetex-latex and GLIBC_6_1 or some such that SuSE
doesn't seem to have.  I don't know if this matters. 
My compiles have similiar problems.

Ray

  
 Hello,
 
 Try to get the xforms rpm from
 ftp://moni.msci.memphis.edu/pub. Although it has the same name than
 the one from redhat and possibly suse, it actually uses libc6. You
 will probably have to uninstall the old one first.
 
 JMarc
 



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

 "Raymond" == Raymond E Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Raymond Hi I believe that is the one I am obtained and am using.  I
Raymond am down loading it (again?) and will try to install in
Raymond tonight.  I will record that rpm expansion.  I am not too
Raymond familiar with rpm so I might have missed something important
Raymond (such as it not installing).  The forms.h it put in place (?)
Raymond has a date stamp of Jan 1998 and a FL_VERSION of 0; so I
Raymond might have failed to actually get it in.  I also have some
Raymond problems with the new binary Xfroms; they want tetex-latex
Raymond and GLIBC_6_1 or some such that SuSE doesn't seem to have.  I
Raymond don't know if this matters.  My compiles have similiar
Raymond problems.

I know nothing about the glibc2.1 or Suse things. However, what I
would try to do is
  rpm -e xforms
to remove the old xforms installation, and then
  rpm -i xforms-0.88-2.i386.rpm
to install the new one. The problem is that, since the version numbers
of the rpms clash, the rpm tool might decide that update is not
necessary.

As far as version is concerned, you can use
  rpm -qi xforms
to see the date of packaging of the different rpms.

Hope this helps.

JMarc



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-17 Thread Raymond E. Rogers

Hi
I will do what you say and send the results to you (JMarc) tonight.  I
will also show you 6.1 requirements from the binaries I obtained.  Would
it be better to send the logs to you directly or to the list?  I
_believe_ in debugging scripts and logs; it is too easy to
misscommunicate when people (including myself) describe what happens.  I
learned this fact long ago when I was an electronics tech in the Navy;
even the most highly trained people would make
mistakes/misrepresentation/oversights when trying to describe problems. 
I found out that I did as well.
BTW: did you know that your email is reaching me twice?

Ray



Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

 
 I know nothing about the glibc2.1 or Suse things. However, what I
 would try to do is
   rpm -e xforms
 to remove the old xforms installation, and then
   rpm -i xforms-0.88-2.i386.rpm
 to install the new one. The problem is that, since the version numbers
 of the rpms clash, the rpm tool might decide that update is not
 necessary.
 
 As far as version is concerned, you can use
   rpm -qi xforms
 to see the date of packaging of the different rpms.
 
 Hope this helps.
 
 JMarc



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

> "Raymond" == Raymond E Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Raymond> One more time into the breach dear friends.  I have
Raymond> spontaniously (well I did a libstdc++ upgrade from SuSE and
Raymond> some other upgrades) broken my lyx and can't seem to get it
Raymond> back. It can't find files it wants in /tmp or (if \use_tmpdir
Raymond> false) even my home directory.

Raymond> I have tried several lyx binaries and recompiles.  I keep
Raymond> getting the erronious linkage (?): ldd lyx-> libc.6.so
Raymond> libc.5.so This was purported to come from xforms but I have
Raymond> installed (I think) the clean xforms.  If someone will help
Raymond> me troubleshoot the system; I will try to put together a
Raymond> troubleshooting script.  I tried the archive but I didn't
Raymond> seem to find a clear answer.  I don't know how bad a shape my
Raymond> system is in now; I tried a lot of things!  I have a lot of
Raymond> lyx bin and source files laying around.  Help would be
Raymond> appreciated.

Hello,

Try to get the xforms rpm from
ftp://moni.msci.memphis.edu/pub. Although it has the same name than
the one from redhat and possibly suse, it actually uses libc6. You
will probably have to uninstall the old one first.

JMarc



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-17 Thread Raymond E. Rogers Sr.

Hi
I believe that is the one I am obtained and am using.  I am down
loading it (again?) and will try to install in tonight.  I will record
that rpm expansion.  I am not too familiar with rpm so I might have missed
something important (such as it not installing).  The forms.h it put in
place (?) has a date stamp of Jan 1998 and a FL_VERSION of 0; so I might
have failed to actually get it in.  I also have some problems with the new
binary Xfroms; they want tetex-latex and GLIBC_6_1 or some such that SuSE
doesn't seem to have.  I don't know if this matters. 
My compiles have similiar problems.

Ray

 > 
> Hello,
> 
> Try to get the xforms rpm from
> ftp://moni.msci.memphis.edu/pub. Although it has the same name than
> the one from redhat and possibly suse, it actually uses libc6. You
> will probably have to uninstall the old one first.
> 
> JMarc
> 



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

> "Raymond" == Raymond E Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Raymond> Hi I believe that is the one I am obtained and am using.  I
Raymond> am down loading it (again?) and will try to install in
Raymond> tonight.  I will record that rpm expansion.  I am not too
Raymond> familiar with rpm so I might have missed something important
Raymond> (such as it not installing).  The forms.h it put in place (?)
Raymond> has a date stamp of Jan 1998 and a FL_VERSION of 0; so I
Raymond> might have failed to actually get it in.  I also have some
Raymond> problems with the new binary Xfroms; they want tetex-latex
Raymond> and GLIBC_6_1 or some such that SuSE doesn't seem to have.  I
Raymond> don't know if this matters.  My compiles have similiar
Raymond> problems.

I know nothing about the glibc2.1 or Suse things. However, what I
would try to do is
  rpm -e xforms
to remove the old xforms installation, and then
  rpm -i xforms-0.88-2.i386.rpm
to install the new one. The problem is that, since the version numbers
of the rpms clash, the rpm tool might decide that update is not
necessary.

As far as version is concerned, you can use
  rpm -qi xforms
to see the date of packaging of the different rpms.

Hope this helps.

JMarc



Re: /tmp/... etc not found Success

1999-05-17 Thread Raymond E. Rogers

Hi
I will do what you say and send the results to you (JMarc) tonight.  I
will also show you 6.1 requirements from the binaries I obtained.  Would
it be better to send the logs to you directly or to the list?  I
_believe_ in debugging scripts and logs; it is too easy to
misscommunicate when people (including myself) describe what happens.  I
learned this fact long ago when I was an electronics tech in the Navy;
even the most highly trained people would make
mistakes/misrepresentation/oversights when trying to describe problems. 
I found out that I did as well.
BTW: did you know that your email is reaching me twice?

Ray



Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

> 
> I know nothing about the glibc2.1 or Suse things. However, what I
> would try to do is
>   rpm -e xforms
> to remove the old xforms installation, and then
>   rpm -i xforms-0.88-2.i386.rpm
> to install the new one. The problem is that, since the version numbers
> of the rpms clash, the rpm tool might decide that update is not
> necessary.
> 
> As far as version is concerned, you can use
>   rpm -qi xforms
> to see the date of packaging of the different rpms.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> JMarc