Re: \includeonly on 1.6.2?

2009-05-04 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 01:26:49PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > Are you sure the manual mentions \includeonly (as opposed to \include)? Yes. It turns out bug 5360 made this point, just not very prominently. I added a clarification there. > The wiki can be fixed by everyone, click the Edit

Re: \includeonly on 1.6.2?

2009-05-04 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-05-03, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 07:56:59PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> \includeonly is currently not supported. > Aha. I think this needs to be fixed in the wiki, then. Not to > mention the manual :) How do I go about that? Are you sure the manual mentions \

Re: \includeonly on 1.6.2?

2009-05-03 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 07:56:59PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > \includeonly is currently not supported. Aha. I think this needs to be fixed in the wiki, then. Not to mention the manual :) How do I go about that? -- Andrew Sullivan a...@shinkuro.com Shinkuro, Inc.

Re: \includeonly on 1.6.2?

2009-05-03 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2009-05-03, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > When I use \includeonly with multiple files. I get the correct ToC and > such at the beginning of the output, but the included file doesn't > ever show up. I'm sure I've missed something in the documentation, > but I've looked through it several times & can

\includeonly on 1.6.2?

2009-05-03 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Hi, 1.6.2, Mac OS X 10.5.6. latex -version pdfTeX 3.141592-1.40.3-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.6) kpathsea version 3.5.6 Copyright 2007 Peter Breitenlohner (eTeX)/Han The Thanh (pdfTeX). Kpathsea is copyright 2007 Karl Berry and Olaf Weber. There is NO warranty. Redistribution of this software is covered by