Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-09-01 Thread Christian Ridderström

On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, rgheck wrote:


On 08/27/2009 10:41 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote:

 Richard,

 just out of curiosity (since I won't be  able to contribute to the coding
 effort), are these instructions supposed to work with the development code
 in
 trunk as well?


In case Richard's instructions didn't work, you can try the one I keep on 
the wiki:


http://wiki.lyx.org/PersonalChr/CompileFromSVN#toc6

This is primarily for building the development code though. Just replace 
the location from which you retrieve the code.


cheers
/Christian

--
Christian Ridderström   Mobile: +46-8 768 39 44

Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-09-01 Thread Christian Ridderström

On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, rgheck wrote:


On 08/27/2009 10:41 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote:

 Richard,

 just out of curiosity (since I won't be  able to contribute to the coding
 effort), are these instructions supposed to work with the development code
 in
 trunk as well?


In case Richard's instructions didn't work, you can try the one I keep on 
the wiki:


http://wiki.lyx.org/PersonalChr/CompileFromSVN#toc6

This is primarily for building the development code though. Just replace 
the location from which you retrieve the code.


cheers
/Christian

--
Christian Ridderström   Mobile: +46-8 768 39 44

Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-09-01 Thread Christian Ridderström

On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, rgheck wrote:


On 08/27/2009 10:41 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote:

 Richard,

 just out of curiosity (since I won't be  able to contribute to the coding
 effort), are these instructions supposed to work with the development code
 in
 trunk as well?


In case Richard's instructions didn't work, you can try the one I keep on 
the wiki:


http://wiki.lyx.org/PersonalChr/CompileFromSVN#toc6

This is primarily for building the development code though. Just replace 
the location from which you retrieve the code.


cheers
/Christian

--
Christian Ridderström   Mobile: +46-8 768 39 44

1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread E. Kaplan
Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version 
in that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from 
sources does not appeal to me.

Thanks,
EK




Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread Manveru
2009/8/27 E. Kaplan ehud.kap...@mssm.edu:
 Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version in
 that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from sources does
 not appeal to me.

There is a LyX project on lanuchpad.net which builds the code for
Ubuntu - I think automatically, but some has to merge the code I
suppose. There is a URL you can set to get LyX from there instead of
official repo, but I had not train it yet. Someone from LyX developers
would take that over to force new rebuild every time new version
arrives.

-- 
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
 gg: 1624001
   http://www.manveru.pl


Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Manveru wrote:
 2009/8/27 E. Kaplan ehud.kap...@mssm.edu:
  Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version in
  that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from sources does
  not appeal to me.
 
 There is a LyX project on lanuchpad.net which builds the code for
 Ubuntu - I think automatically, but some has to merge the code I
 suppose. There is a URL you can set to get LyX from there instead of
 official repo, but I had not train it yet. Someone from LyX developers
 would take that over to force new rebuild every time new version
 arrives.

An upload of 1.6.4 to Debian unstable will happen soon [1]. After this
package hits unstable you can somehow request a sync from Ubuntu.
But they won't sync everything in every situation and they don't backport
everything for every old release.
So all in all it's quite specific what hits Ubuntu when and where. :)

Sven

[1] Yes, switching the VCS in use sometimes is a bit more tricky then
it looks like at a firce glance.
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]


Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread rgheck

On 08/27/2009 08:45 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote:

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Manveru wrote:
   

2009/8/27 E. Kaplanehud.kap...@mssm.edu:
 

Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version in
that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from sources does
not appeal to me.

   
That of course is up to you, but I myself would recommend that people 
who can do compile from source, and indeed from the svn stable branch. 
Why wait until the next stable release to get the bug fixes?


For those who do want to do this, here's a quick guide.

1. Make sure you have the usual buildtools installed: autotools, make, 
gcc, etc. You will of course also need various development packages, 
such as qt4-devel. Making sure you have all of these is probably the 
most annoying part of the process. Whether you have them all will become 
clear later.


2. Create a directory for the LyX sources, let's say, /home/you/src/lyx/.

3. cd /home/you/src/lyx

4. svn co svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/ . (note 
the trailing dot)


5. ./autogen.sh

6. ./configure --enable-build-type=rel
   You could also choose devel there, but if you're more a regular 
user, you probably want rel. Note that, by default, this will install 
LyX under /usr/local/.
   If configure fails, it will likely be because you don't have certain 
devel packages installed. LyX will tell you which these are. But note, 
if it says, Can't find Qt4, or something like that, it doesn't mean 
you don't have Qt4 installed. It means you don't have the Qt4 devel 
package installed.


7. make -j2
The two means use two processors. Adjust this depending on your 
system. Generally, advice around here has been that people should use 
all processors. Since the compilation won't actually use them all, due 
to disk activity and the like, the system should still be responsive.
This will take a while the first time. Other times will be a lot 
faster.


8. sudo make install, or su -c 'make install', or whatever is 
appropriate for your system.


Happy compiling,
Richard


9. Now, to make life really easy, set up a cron job to keep the LyX 
sources updated. Then, every once in a while, recompile and reinstall.


Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread Stefano Franchi
Richard,

just out of curiosity (since I won't be  able to contribute to the coding 
effort), are these instructions supposed to work with the development code in 
trunk as well? 
They don't seem to on my system (the configure script generated by autogen.sh 
fails).


S.
__
Stefano Franchi
Department of Philosophy  Ph:  (979) 862-2211
Texas AM University  Fax: (979) 845-0458
305B Bolton Hall  fran...@philosophy.tamu.edu
College Station, TX 77843-4237


Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread rgheck

On 08/27/2009 10:41 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote:

Richard,

just out of curiosity (since I won't be  able to contribute to the coding
effort), are these instructions supposed to work with the development code in
trunk as well?

   

More or less, yes.


They don't seem to on my system (the configure script generated by autogen.sh
fails).

   

With what message?

rh



1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread E. Kaplan
Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version 
in that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from 
sources does not appeal to me.

Thanks,
EK




Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread Manveru
2009/8/27 E. Kaplan ehud.kap...@mssm.edu:
 Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version in
 that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from sources does
 not appeal to me.

There is a LyX project on lanuchpad.net which builds the code for
Ubuntu - I think automatically, but some has to merge the code I
suppose. There is a URL you can set to get LyX from there instead of
official repo, but I had not train it yet. Someone from LyX developers
would take that over to force new rebuild every time new version
arrives.

-- 
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
 gg: 1624001
   http://www.manveru.pl


Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Manveru wrote:
 2009/8/27 E. Kaplan ehud.kap...@mssm.edu:
  Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version in
  that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from sources does
  not appeal to me.
 
 There is a LyX project on lanuchpad.net which builds the code for
 Ubuntu - I think automatically, but some has to merge the code I
 suppose. There is a URL you can set to get LyX from there instead of
 official repo, but I had not train it yet. Someone from LyX developers
 would take that over to force new rebuild every time new version
 arrives.

An upload of 1.6.4 to Debian unstable will happen soon [1]. After this
package hits unstable you can somehow request a sync from Ubuntu.
But they won't sync everything in every situation and they don't backport
everything for every old release.
So all in all it's quite specific what hits Ubuntu when and where. :)

Sven

[1] Yes, switching the VCS in use sometimes is a bit more tricky then
it looks like at a firce glance.
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]


Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread rgheck

On 08/27/2009 08:45 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote:

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Manveru wrote:
   

2009/8/27 E. Kaplanehud.kap...@mssm.edu:
 

Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version in
that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from sources does
not appeal to me.

   
That of course is up to you, but I myself would recommend that people 
who can do compile from source, and indeed from the svn stable branch. 
Why wait until the next stable release to get the bug fixes?


For those who do want to do this, here's a quick guide.

1. Make sure you have the usual buildtools installed: autotools, make, 
gcc, etc. You will of course also need various development packages, 
such as qt4-devel. Making sure you have all of these is probably the 
most annoying part of the process. Whether you have them all will become 
clear later.


2. Create a directory for the LyX sources, let's say, /home/you/src/lyx/.

3. cd /home/you/src/lyx

4. svn co svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/ . (note 
the trailing dot)


5. ./autogen.sh

6. ./configure --enable-build-type=rel
   You could also choose devel there, but if you're more a regular 
user, you probably want rel. Note that, by default, this will install 
LyX under /usr/local/.
   If configure fails, it will likely be because you don't have certain 
devel packages installed. LyX will tell you which these are. But note, 
if it says, Can't find Qt4, or something like that, it doesn't mean 
you don't have Qt4 installed. It means you don't have the Qt4 devel 
package installed.


7. make -j2
The two means use two processors. Adjust this depending on your 
system. Generally, advice around here has been that people should use 
all processors. Since the compilation won't actually use them all, due 
to disk activity and the like, the system should still be responsive.
This will take a while the first time. Other times will be a lot 
faster.


8. sudo make install, or su -c 'make install', or whatever is 
appropriate for your system.


Happy compiling,
Richard


9. Now, to make life really easy, set up a cron job to keep the LyX 
sources updated. Then, every once in a while, recompile and reinstall.


Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread Stefano Franchi
Richard,

just out of curiosity (since I won't be  able to contribute to the coding 
effort), are these instructions supposed to work with the development code in 
trunk as well? 
They don't seem to on my system (the configure script generated by autogen.sh 
fails).


S.
__
Stefano Franchi
Department of Philosophy  Ph:  (979) 862-2211
Texas AM University  Fax: (979) 845-0458
305B Bolton Hall  fran...@philosophy.tamu.edu
College Station, TX 77843-4237


Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread rgheck

On 08/27/2009 10:41 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote:

Richard,

just out of curiosity (since I won't be  able to contribute to the coding
effort), are these instructions supposed to work with the development code in
trunk as well?

   

More or less, yes.


They don't seem to on my system (the configure script generated by autogen.sh
fails).

   

With what message?

rh



1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread E. Kaplan
Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version 
in that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from 
sources does not appeal to me.

Thanks,
EK




Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread Manveru
2009/8/27 E. Kaplan :
> Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version in
> that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from sources does
> not appeal to me.

There is a LyX project on lanuchpad.net which builds the code for
Ubuntu - I think automatically, but some has to merge the code I
suppose. There is a URL you can set to get LyX from there instead of
official repo, but I had not train it yet. Someone from LyX developers
would take that over to force new rebuild every time new version
arrives.

-- 
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
 gg: 1624001
   http://www.manveru.pl


Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Manveru wrote:
> 2009/8/27 E. Kaplan :
> > Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version in
> > that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from sources does
> > not appeal to me.
> 
> There is a LyX project on lanuchpad.net which builds the code for
> Ubuntu - I think automatically, but some has to merge the code I
> suppose. There is a URL you can set to get LyX from there instead of
> official repo, but I had not train it yet. Someone from LyX developers
> would take that over to force new rebuild every time new version
> arrives.

An upload of 1.6.4 to Debian unstable will happen soon [1]. After this
package hits unstable you can somehow request a sync from Ubuntu.
But they won't sync everything in every situation and they don't backport
everything for every old release.
So all in all it's quite specific what hits Ubuntu when and where. :)

Sven

[1] Yes, switching the VCS in use sometimes is a bit more tricky then
it looks like at a firce glance.
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]


Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread rgheck

On 08/27/2009 08:45 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote:

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Manveru wrote:
   

2009/8/27 E. Kaplan:
 

Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version in
that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from sources does
not appeal to me.

   
That of course is up to you, but I myself would recommend that people 
who can do compile from source, and indeed from the svn stable branch. 
Why wait until the next stable release to get the bug fixes?


For those who do want to do this, here's a quick guide.

1. Make sure you have the usual buildtools installed: autotools, make, 
gcc, etc. You will of course also need various development packages, 
such as qt4-devel. Making sure you have all of these is probably the 
most annoying part of the process. Whether you have them all will become 
clear later.


2. Create a directory for the LyX sources, let's say, /home/you/src/lyx/.

3. cd /home/you/src/lyx

4. svn co svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/ . (note 
the trailing dot)


5. ./autogen.sh

6. ./configure --enable-build-type=rel
   You could also choose "devel" there, but if you're more a "regular 
user", you probably want "rel". Note that, by default, this will install 
LyX under /usr/local/.
   If configure fails, it will likely be because you don't have certain 
devel packages installed. LyX will tell you which these are. But note, 
if it says, "Can't find Qt4", or something like that, it doesn't mean 
you don't have Qt4 installed. It means you don't have the Qt4 devel 
package installed.


7. make -j2
The two means "use two processors". Adjust this depending on your 
system. Generally, advice around here has been that people should use 
all processors. Since the compilation won't actually use them all, due 
to disk activity and the like, the system should still be responsive.
This will take a while the first time. Other times will be a lot 
faster.


8. sudo make install, or su -c 'make install', or whatever is 
appropriate for your system.


Happy compiling,
Richard


9. Now, to make life really easy, set up a cron job to keep the LyX 
sources updated. Then, every once in a while, recompile and reinstall.


Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread Stefano Franchi
Richard,

just out of curiosity (since I won't be  able to contribute to the coding 
effort), are these instructions supposed to work with the development code in 
trunk as well? 
They don't seem to on my system (the configure script generated by autogen.sh 
fails).


S.
__
Stefano Franchi
Department of Philosophy  Ph:  (979) 862-2211
Texas A University  Fax: (979) 845-0458
305B Bolton Hall  fran...@philosophy.tamu.edu
College Station, TX 77843-4237


Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread rgheck

On 08/27/2009 10:41 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote:

Richard,

just out of curiosity (since I won't be  able to contribute to the coding
effort), are these instructions supposed to work with the development code in
trunk as well?

   

More or less, yes.


They don't seem to on my system (the configure script generated by autogen.sh
fails).

   

With what message?

rh