Re: ACM SIGs vs SIGPLAN
Alexy Khrabrov schrieb: Greetings -- I'm typesetting a paper for ACM SIGKDD, and found ACM SIGPLAN style by George Fairbanks, now in the latest LyX 1.6.1, described on the wiki at http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/AcmSigplan -- which refers to the ACM SIGPLAN's own http://www.sigplan.org/authorInformation.htm However, SIGKDD refers to a general SIGs format at http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates Interesting point. I wrote the LyX layout file for ACMSigplan because a user requested this. ACMSigplan is a LaTeX class for conference submissions of this special SIG while it seems that ACM SIG is the class file for general proceeding submissions. So the general class file is this one: http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates while the general ACM class file is this one: http://www.acm.org/publications/latex_style wile some SIGs have its own class file. This is besides SIGPlan also SIGGraph. I wrote a LyX layout file for ACMSIGGRAPH: http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/AcmSiggraph that will be part of tzhe next release LyX 1.6.2. I think that you will have to use the general SIG class. I can write a LyX layout file for this. But can you please contact the SIG people if it is for now also OK to submit your paper using the SIGPlan or SIGGraph calss file that is already supported by LyX and report me what they say? regards Uwe
Re: ACM SIGs vs SIGPLAN
Alexy Khrabrov schrieb: Greetings -- I'm typesetting a paper for ACM SIGKDD, and found ACM SIGPLAN style by George Fairbanks, now in the latest LyX 1.6.1, described on the wiki at http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/AcmSigplan -- which refers to the ACM SIGPLAN's own http://www.sigplan.org/authorInformation.htm However, SIGKDD refers to a general SIGs format at http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates Interesting point. I wrote the LyX layout file for ACMSigplan because a user requested this. ACMSigplan is a LaTeX class for conference submissions of this special SIG while it seems that ACM SIG is the class file for general proceeding submissions. So the general class file is this one: http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates while the general ACM class file is this one: http://www.acm.org/publications/latex_style wile some SIGs have its own class file. This is besides SIGPlan also SIGGraph. I wrote a LyX layout file for ACMSIGGRAPH: http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/AcmSiggraph that will be part of tzhe next release LyX 1.6.2. I think that you will have to use the general SIG class. I can write a LyX layout file for this. But can you please contact the SIG people if it is for now also OK to submit your paper using the SIGPlan or SIGGraph calss file that is already supported by LyX and report me what they say? regards Uwe
Re: ACM SIGs vs SIGPLAN
Alexy Khrabrov schrieb: Greetings -- I'm typesetting a paper for ACM SIGKDD, and found ACM SIGPLAN style by George Fairbanks, now in the latest LyX 1.6.1, described on the wiki at http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/AcmSigplan -- which refers to the ACM SIGPLAN's own http://www.sigplan.org/authorInformation.htm However, SIGKDD refers to a general SIGs format at http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates Interesting point. I wrote the LyX layout file for ACMSigplan because a user requested this. ACMSigplan is a LaTeX class for conference submissions of this special SIG while it seems that ACM SIG is the class file for general proceeding submissions. So the general class file is this one: http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates while the general ACM class file is this one: http://www.acm.org/publications/latex_style wile some SIGs have its own class file. This is besides SIGPlan also SIGGraph. I wrote a LyX layout file for ACMSIGGRAPH: http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/AcmSiggraph that will be part of tzhe next release LyX 1.6.2. I think that you will have to use the general SIG class. I can write a LyX layout file for this. But can you please contact the SIG people if it is for now also OK to submit your paper using the SIGPlan or SIGGraph calss file that is already supported by LyX and report me what they say? regards Uwe
ACM SIGs vs SIGPLAN
Greetings -- I'm typesetting a paper for ACM SIGKDD, and found ACM SIGPLAN style by George Fairbanks, now in the latest LyX 1.6.1, described on the wiki at http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/AcmSigplan -- which refers to the ACM SIGPLAN's own http://www.sigplan.org/authorInformation.htm However, SIGKDD refers to a general SIGs format at http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates Are there folks here who compared those and who can tell how those general SIG formats correspond to the SIGPLAN one, and/or how one can take the general SIG formats and create two more layouts in LyX? Cheers, Alexy
ACM SIGs vs SIGPLAN
Greetings -- I'm typesetting a paper for ACM SIGKDD, and found ACM SIGPLAN style by George Fairbanks, now in the latest LyX 1.6.1, described on the wiki at http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/AcmSigplan -- which refers to the ACM SIGPLAN's own http://www.sigplan.org/authorInformation.htm However, SIGKDD refers to a general SIGs format at http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates Are there folks here who compared those and who can tell how those general SIG formats correspond to the SIGPLAN one, and/or how one can take the general SIG formats and create two more layouts in LyX? Cheers, Alexy
ACM SIGs vs SIGPLAN
Greetings -- I'm typesetting a paper for ACM SIGKDD, and found ACM SIGPLAN style by George Fairbanks, now in the latest LyX 1.6.1, described on the wiki at http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/AcmSigplan -- which refers to the ACM SIGPLAN's own http://www.sigplan.org/authorInformation.htm However, SIGKDD refers to a general SIGs format at http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates Are there folks here who compared those and who can tell how those "general" SIG formats correspond to the SIGPLAN one, and/or how one can take the "general" SIG formats and create two more layouts in LyX? Cheers, Alexy
