Daniel Lohmann schrieb:
> On 22.10.2008, at 14:12, Charles de Miramon wrote:
>> Daniel Lohmann wrote:
>>> some ERT box is not an option, as this would cause too much hassle
>>> and would not work in external material, such as bibliographic
>>> entries. I am looking for a more elegant solution.
>>
On 23.10.2008, at 00:00, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Since I started to waste the evening with TeX, the final version:
\def\plus{+}
\def\gobble#1{}
\catcode`\+=\active
\def\checknextchar{%
\ifx\nextchar+%
\raisebox{0.6ex}{\tiny\plus\kern-.3ex\plus}%
\let\next\gobble%
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Since I started to waste the evening with TeX, the final version:
\def\plus{+}
\def\gobble#1{}
\catcode`\+=\active
\def\checknextchar{%
\ifx\nextchar+%
\raisebox{0.6ex}{\tiny\plus\kern-.3ex\plus}%
\let\next\gobble%
\else%
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 05:44:58PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>
I think that I remember to have read about so-called catcodes (or
whatever?) in TeX, which apparently make it possible to declare
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
I think that I remember to have read about so-called catcodes (or
whatever?) in TeX, which apparently make it possible to declare certain
characters as "active" so that further processing is possible whenev
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > I think that I remember to have read about so-called catcodes (or
> > whatever?) in TeX, which apparently make it possible to declare certain
> > characters as "active" so that further processing is possible whenever
> > the Te
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 01:51:34PM +0200, Daniel Lohmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently in the process of polishing the typesetting of my thesis.
> One of the things I would like to achieve is to reduce the spacing
> between "++" in the words C++ and AspectC++, as this looks somewhat
> "strange
On 22.10.2008, at 14:07, Konrad Hofbauer wrote:
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
Any TeX gurus on this list who might help me?
If you don't get any answer here, try in the comp.text.tex newsgroup.
Thanks Konrad!
Daniel,
who is hoping nevertheless to find an expert here :-)
On 22.10.2008, at 14:12, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
[...]
occurrences with some ERT box is not an option, as this would cause
too much hassle and would not work in external material, such as
bibliographic entries. I am looking for a more elegant solution.
The easiest way
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently in the process of polishing the typesetting of my
> thesis. One of the things I would like to achieve is to reduce the
> spacing between "++" in the words C++ and AspectC++, as this looks
> somewhat "strange" with the font I am using.
>
> This quest
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
Any TeX gurus on this list who might help me?
If you don't get any answer here, try in the comp.text.tex newsgroup.
/Konrad
Hi,
I am currently in the process of polishing the typesetting of my
thesis. One of the things I would like to achieve is to reduce the
spacing between "++" in the words C++ and AspectC++, as this looks
somewhat "strange" with the font I am using.
This question is somewhat related to the
12 matches
Mail list logo
