Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Bruce Pourciau]

When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)  
originally created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry  
between the already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry  
was given the number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here.  
The entries were just typed one-by-one into in the bibliography  
environment.


Bruce

Re: Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Rich Shepard]

On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Bruce Pourciau wrote:


When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class) originally
created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry between the
already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry was given the
number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here. The entries were just
typed one-by-one into in the bibliography environment.


Bruce,

  Were the prior list entries indented? That is, did you increase the
environment depth of those?

  If so, insertion of a new entry in the middle of that list decreases the
environment depth and starts it over again.

  Otherwise, I'm clueless.

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
http://www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863

Re: Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Bruce Pourciau]

  Were the prior list entries indented? That is, did you increase the
environment depth of those?


No, the depth is the same. If I place the cursor at the end of the  
text for any particular bibliography entry and hit return, I get, for  
example, key-2 [1] in gray. I get the number [1] no matter where I  
try to insert a new entry.


Bruce

On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:27 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:


On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Bruce Pourciau wrote:

When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)  
originally
created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry between  
the

already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry was given the
number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here. The entries  
were just

typed one-by-one into in the bibliography environment.


Bruce,

  Were the prior list entries indented? That is, did you increase the
environment depth of those?

  If so, insertion of a new entry in the middle of that list  
decreases the

environment depth and starts it over again.

  Otherwise, I'm clueless.

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental  
Permitting

Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
http://www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax:  
503-667-8863

Re: Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Jose' Matos]

On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:49, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
 When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)
 originally created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry
 between the already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry
 was given the number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here.
 The entries were just typed one-by-one into in the bibliography
 environment.

  That is just for lyx, the printed version should be OK.

  Also next time you open this file the number will be correct. Note that the 
number that shows there is not used anywhere, so this buglet is harmless. :-)

  I am saying this by heart so I could (should? ;-) be wrong. :-)

 Bruce

-- 
José Abílio

Re: Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Bruce Pourciau]

You're right, José. The printed version is fine and reopening the  
file fixed the numbering on screen.


Thanks.

Bruce

On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Jose' Matos wrote:


On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:49, Bruce Pourciau wrote:

When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)
originally created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry
between the already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry
was given the number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here.
The entries were just typed one-by-one into in the bibliography
environment.


  That is just for lyx, the printed version should be OK.

  Also next time you open this file the number will be correct.  
Note that the
number that shows there is not used anywhere, so this buglet is  
harmless. :-)


  I am saying this by heart so I could (should? ;-) be wrong. :-)


Bruce


--
José Abílio

Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Bruce Pourciau]

When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)  
originally created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry  
between the already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry  
was given the number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here.  
The entries were just typed one-by-one into in the bibliography  
environment.


Bruce

Re: Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Rich Shepard]

On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Bruce Pourciau wrote:


When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class) originally
created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry between the
already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry was given the
number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here. The entries were just
typed one-by-one into in the bibliography environment.


Bruce,

  Were the prior list entries indented? That is, did you increase the
environment depth of those?

  If so, insertion of a new entry in the middle of that list decreases the
environment depth and starts it over again.

  Otherwise, I'm clueless.

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
http://www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863

Re: Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Bruce Pourciau]

  Were the prior list entries indented? That is, did you increase the
environment depth of those?


No, the depth is the same. If I place the cursor at the end of the  
text for any particular bibliography entry and hit return, I get, for  
example, key-2 [1] in gray. I get the number [1] no matter where I  
try to insert a new entry.


Bruce

On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:27 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:


On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Bruce Pourciau wrote:

When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)  
originally
created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry between  
the

already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry was given the
number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here. The entries  
were just

typed one-by-one into in the bibliography environment.


Bruce,

  Were the prior list entries indented? That is, did you increase the
environment depth of those?

  If so, insertion of a new entry in the middle of that list  
decreases the

environment depth and starts it over again.

  Otherwise, I'm clueless.

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental  
Permitting

Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
http://www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax:  
503-667-8863

Re: Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Jose' Matos]

On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:49, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
 When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)
 originally created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry
 between the already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry
 was given the number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here.
 The entries were just typed one-by-one into in the bibliography
 environment.

  That is just for lyx, the printed version should be OK.

  Also next time you open this file the number will be correct. Note that the 
number that shows there is not used anywhere, so this buglet is harmless. :-)

  I am saying this by heart so I could (should? ;-) be wrong. :-)

 Bruce

-- 
José Abílio

Re: Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Bruce Pourciau]

You're right, José. The printed version is fine and reopening the  
file fixed the numbering on screen.


Thanks.

Bruce

On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Jose' Matos wrote:


On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:49, Bruce Pourciau wrote:

When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)
originally created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry
between the already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry
was given the number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here.
The entries were just typed one-by-one into in the bibliography
environment.


  That is just for lyx, the printed version should be OK.

  Also next time you open this file the number will be correct.  
Note that the
number that shows there is not used anywhere, so this buglet is  
harmless. :-)


  I am saying this by heart so I could (should? ;-) be wrong. :-)


Bruce


--
José Abílio

Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Bruce Pourciau]

When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)  
originally created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry  
between the already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry  
was given the number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here.  
The entries were just typed one-by-one into in the bibliography  
environment.


Bruce

Re: Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Rich Shepard]

On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Bruce Pourciau wrote:


When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class) originally
created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry between the
already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry was given the
number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here. The entries were just
typed one-by-one into in the bibliography environment.


Bruce,

  Were the prior list entries indented? That is, did you increase the
environment depth of those?

  If so, insertion of a new entry in the middle of that list decreases the
environment depth and starts it over again.

  Otherwise, I'm clueless.

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
 Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863

Re: Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Bruce Pourciau]

  Were the prior list entries indented? That is, did you increase the
environment depth of those?


No, the depth is the same. If I place the cursor at the end of the  
text for any particular bibliography entry and hit return, I get, for  
example, key-2 [1] in gray. I get the number [1] no matter where I  
try to insert a new entry.


Bruce

On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:27 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:


On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Bruce Pourciau wrote:

When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)  
originally
created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry between  
the

already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry was given the
number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here. The entries  
were just

typed one-by-one into in the bibliography environment.


Bruce,

  Were the prior list entries indented? That is, did you increase the
environment depth of those?

  If so, insertion of a new entry in the middle of that list  
decreases the

environment depth and starts it over again.

  Otherwise, I'm clueless.

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental  
Permitting

Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
 Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax:  
503-667-8863

Re: Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Jose' Matos]

On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:49, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
> When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)
> originally created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry
> between the already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry
> was given the number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here.
> The entries were just typed one-by-one into in the bibliography
> environment.

  That is just for lyx, the printed version should be OK.

  Also next time you open this file the number will be correct. Note that the 
number that shows there is not used anywhere, so this buglet is harmless. :-)

  I am saying this by heart so I could (should? ;-) be wrong. :-)

> Bruce

-- 
José Abílio

Re: Bibliography in LyX 1.4.1

[Bruce Pourciau]

You're right, José. The printed version is fine and reopening the  
file fixed the numbering on screen.


Thanks.

Bruce

On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Jose' Matos wrote:


On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:49, Bruce Pourciau wrote:

When I opened in LyX 1.4.1 a document (standard article class)
originally created in LyX 1.3.4 and inserted a new bibliography entry
between the already existing fifth and sixth entries, the new entry
was given the number 1, not number 6. Any thoughts? No BibTeX here.
The entries were just typed one-by-one into in the bibliography
environment.


  That is just for lyx, the printed version should be OK.

  Also next time you open this file the number will be correct.  
Note that the
number that shows there is not used anywhere, so this buglet is  
harmless. :-)


  I am saying this by heart so I could (should? ;-) be wrong. :-)


Bruce


--
José Abílio