Re: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:01:01PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2016 um 12:34:19, schrieb Bernt Lie > > > Thanks, Jürgen! > > -B > > > > From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] On Behalf Of > > Jürgen Lange > > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 14:20 > > To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org > > Subject: Re: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2? > > > > To seperate the two theorems, you have to go to the end of the first > > theorem and press 3 times "enter", a red line should occur. Then you can > > add your second theorem below. I did not take a deep look, but perhaps Edit > Start New Environment is relevant here. The main point is, how can LyX know that you want to start a new environment and not continue the first one? You have to tell it in some way. That said, this does seem to be a source of confusion for many users. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2?
Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2016 um 12:34:19, schrieb Bernt Lie > Thanks, Jürgen! > -B > > From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] On Behalf Of > Jürgen Lange > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 14:20 > To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org > Subject: Re: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2? > > To seperate the two theorems, you have to go to the end of the first theorem > and press 3 times "enter", a red line should occur. Then you can add your > second theorem below. > That's better. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2?
Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2016 um 12:01:10, schrieb Bernt Lie
> I used new "theorem" in both cases. Here is what it looks like:
I see. The only option may be to insert empty text.
As a separator use standard with ERT containing only {}
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
RE: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2?
Thanks, Jürgen! -B From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] On Behalf Of Jürgen Lange Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 14:20 To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2? To seperate the two theorems, you have to go to the end of the first theorem and press 3 times "enter", a red line should occur. Then you can add your second theorem below. Regards Am 11.08.2016, 14:01 Uhr, schrieb Bernt Lie mailto:bernt@hit.no>>: I used new "theorem" in both cases. Here is what it looks like: [cid:image001.png@01D1F3DD.7275A690] The second one does not get numbered. -- However, if I insert a *standard paragraph* in between, then it works. [cid:image002.png@01D1F3DD.7275A690] But I think that it should be possible to have two theorems in sequence, without standard text in between??? -B -Original Message- From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org<mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] On Behalf Of Kornel Benko Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 13:56 To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org<mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> Subject: Re: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2? Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2016 um 11:34:53, schrieb Bernt Lie mailto:bernt@hit.no>> > Preliminaries: Windows 10, LyX 2.2.1. > > Suppose I change a paragraph from standard to Theorem. The theorem then gets > numbered. Nice. > > However, If I have a *new* theorem in the subsequent paragraph, this one does > not get numbered!!! At least not in the LyX editor? > > This must be a bug??? It should be possible to have two theorems in sequence? > > Thanks. > -Bernt L. Use new 'theorem', not new 'theorem*'. Kornel
Re: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2?
To seperate the two theorems, you have to go to the end of the first theorem and press 3 times "enter", a red line should occur. Then you can add your second theorem below. Regards Am 11.08.2016, 14:01 Uhr, schrieb Bernt Lie : I used new "theorem" in both cases. Here is what it looks like: The second one does not get numbered. -- However, if I insert a *standard paragraph* in between, then it works. But I think that it should be possible to have two theorems in sequence, without standard text in between??? -B -Original Message- From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] On Behalf Of Kornel Benko Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 13:56 To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2? Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2016 um 11:34:53, schrieb Bernt Lie Preliminaries: Windows 10, LyX 2.2.1. Suppose I change a paragraph from standard to Theorem. The theorem then gets numbered. Nice. However, If I have a *new* theorem in the subsequent paragraph, this one does not get numbered!!! At least not in the LyX editor? This must be a bug??? It should be possible to have two theorems in sequence? Thanks. -Bernt L. Use new 'theorem', not new 'theorem*'. Kornel
RE: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2?
I used new "theorem" in both cases. Here is what it looks like: [cid:image001.png@01D1F3D8.D138EF70] The second one does not get numbered. -- However, if I insert a *standard paragraph* in between, then it works. [cid:image002.png@01D1F3D8.D138EF70] But I think that it should be possible to have two theorems in sequence, without standard text in between??? -B -Original Message- From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] On Behalf Of Kornel Benko Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 13:56 To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2? Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2016 um 11:34:53, schrieb Bernt Lie mailto:bernt@hit.no>> > Preliminaries: Windows 10, LyX 2.2.1. > > Suppose I change a paragraph from standard to Theorem. The theorem then gets > numbered. Nice. > > However, If I have a *new* theorem in the subsequent paragraph, this one does > not get numbered!!! At least not in the LyX editor? > > This must be a bug??? It should be possible to have two theorems in sequence? > > Thanks. > -Bernt L. Use new 'theorem', not new 'theorem*'. Kornel
Re: Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2?
Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2016 um 11:34:53, schrieb Bernt Lie > Preliminaries: Windows 10, LyX 2.2.1. > > Suppose I change a paragraph from standard to Theorem. The theorem then gets > numbered. Nice. > > However, If I have a *new* theorem in the subsequent paragraph, this one does > not get numbered!!! At least not in the LyX editor? > > This must be a bug??? It should be possible to have two theorems in sequence? > > Thanks. > -Bernt L. Use new 'theorem', not new 'theorem*'. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug with theorems in LyX 2.2?
Preliminaries: Windows 10, LyX 2.2.1. Suppose I change a paragraph from standard to Theorem. The theorem then gets numbered. Nice. However, If I have a *new* theorem in the subsequent paragraph, this one does not get numbered!!! At least not in the LyX editor? This must be a bug??? It should be possible to have two theorems in sequence? Thanks. -Bernt L.
