Can't use 1.5.0 for CJK right?

2007-03-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi everyone. I am going to be writing a paper which will probably need some CJK characters in it. I have the problem which is discussed in the following bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 I'm not sure what's been done since then or if there's been an update which will

Re: Can't use 1.5.0 for CJK right?

2007-03-27 Thread Georg Baum
Am Dienstag, 27. März 2007 20:01 schrieb Stacia Hartleben: Hi everyone. I am going to be writing a paper which will probably need some CJK characters in it. I have the problem which is discussed in the following bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 I'm not sure what's

Can't use 1.5.0 for CJK right?

2007-03-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi everyone. I am going to be writing a paper which will probably need some CJK characters in it. I have the problem which is discussed in the following bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 I'm not sure what's been done since then or if there's been an update which will

Re: Can't use 1.5.0 for CJK right?

2007-03-27 Thread Georg Baum
Am Dienstag, 27. März 2007 20:01 schrieb Stacia Hartleben: Hi everyone. I am going to be writing a paper which will probably need some CJK characters in it. I have the problem which is discussed in the following bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 I'm not sure what's

Can't use 1.5.0 for CJK right?

2007-03-27 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi everyone. I am going to be writing a paper which will probably need some CJK characters in it. I have the problem which is discussed in the following bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 I'm not sure what's been done since then or if there's been an update which will

Re: Can't use 1.5.0 for CJK right?

2007-03-27 Thread Georg Baum
Am Dienstag, 27. März 2007 20:01 schrieb Stacia Hartleben: > Hi everyone. I am going to be writing a paper which will probably need > some CJK characters in it. I have the problem which is discussed in > the following bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 > > I'm not sure