On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:38:36AM, Stephan E. Schlierf wrote:
> As far as I know, the newer Ghostscript versions (I'm talking
> about Aladdin's) - say: new than 6.0 - are a bit buggy. It
> means that images aren't displayed very well (they appear quite
> semary).
>
> I use 5.50 and the PDF outpu
I don't want to increase the confusion, but just a few remarks:
Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Hanxue Lee wrote:
>
>
>>1. Through GNU Ghostscript (first option in menu)
>>2. Through PDF latex (second option in menu)
>>Which one produces a higher quality output?
>>
>
> In my opi
>>Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:52:29 +0200 (EET)
>>From: Tuukka Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>X-X-Sender: tuukkat@stekt30
>>To: Hanxue Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>cc: Lyx Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Difference between PDF (GNU
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Hanxue Lee wrote:
>1. Through GNU Ghostscript (first option in menu)
>2. Through PDF latex (second option in menu)
>Which one produces a higher quality output?
In my opinion, pdflatex creates higher quality output,
but it is more difficult to use.
- if you use pdflatex, you
Hi there,
There are two options to export Lyx files into PDF format:
1. Through GNU Ghostscript (first option in menu)
2. Through PDF latex (second option in menu)
Which one produces a higher quality output?
What is the main difference (e.g. what are the intermediate steps
involved to produce t
