Re: Different program listing styles
Dominik Böhm wrote: Please do not use 1.6.0svn for any serious work. It is simply not ready. I have been using 1.6.0svn since 1,5 months for my diploma thesis and it has been working really great, yet. This program listing problem is the first serious problem that I am experiencing with 1.6.0svn. So, I would say for me is it ready, but maybe I am not using all the features. Nevertheless: It's a development version, and even if it's working rather well currently, it might be break and become unusable and eat your docs the next hour, if some developer is in the mood (or has a bad day). So do not use it for serious work such as a diploma thesis, unless you really think your diploma thesis is worthless. Jürgen
Re: Different program listing styles
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dominik Böhm wrote: Please do not use 1.6.0svn for any serious work. It is simply not ready. I have been using 1.6.0svn since 1,5 months for my diploma thesis and it has been working really great, yet. This program listing problem is the first serious problem that I am experiencing with 1.6.0svn. So, I would say for me is it ready, but maybe I am not using all the features. Nevertheless: It's a development version, and even if it's working rather well currently, it might be break and become unusable and eat your docs the next hour, if some developer is in the mood (or has a bad day). So do not use it for serious work such as a diploma thesis, unless you really think your diploma thesis is worthless. I am aware of the fact that there are risks involved using LyX for serious work. But rest assured that my files are safe: I use an SVN-server for my thesis and upload my work to the server twice a day. Thus, I might loose about 4 hours of it at maximum. Further I upload my files each time I update LyX to make sure that apparent bugs don't ruin my work. With other words I am well prepared for the day LyX stops working: I can switch back to my last version of LyX at any time. I know that there might also be changes in the LyX file format. If that happens and I won't be able to adapt my files to the new format, I will still be able to finish my thesis, as my current version works very well and I have to hand it in by the end of March. Due to the time frame stepping back to 1.5.4 is no option for me: there are already too many changes in the file format regarding the layout modules for example. Dominik
Re: Different program listing styles
Dominik Böhm wrote: Please do not use 1.6.0svn for any serious work. It is simply not ready. I have been using 1.6.0svn since 1,5 months for my diploma thesis and it has been working really great, yet. This program listing problem is the first serious problem that I am experiencing with 1.6.0svn. So, I would say for me is it ready, but maybe I am not using all the features. Nevertheless: It's a development version, and even if it's working rather well currently, it might be break and become unusable and eat your docs the next hour, if some developer is in the mood (or has a bad day). So do not use it for serious work such as a diploma thesis, unless you really think your diploma thesis is worthless. Jürgen
Re: Different program listing styles
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dominik Böhm wrote: Please do not use 1.6.0svn for any serious work. It is simply not ready. I have been using 1.6.0svn since 1,5 months for my diploma thesis and it has been working really great, yet. This program listing problem is the first serious problem that I am experiencing with 1.6.0svn. So, I would say for me is it ready, but maybe I am not using all the features. Nevertheless: It's a development version, and even if it's working rather well currently, it might be break and become unusable and eat your docs the next hour, if some developer is in the mood (or has a bad day). So do not use it for serious work such as a diploma thesis, unless you really think your diploma thesis is worthless. I am aware of the fact that there are risks involved using LyX for serious work. But rest assured that my files are safe: I use an SVN-server for my thesis and upload my work to the server twice a day. Thus, I might loose about 4 hours of it at maximum. Further I upload my files each time I update LyX to make sure that apparent bugs don't ruin my work. With other words I am well prepared for the day LyX stops working: I can switch back to my last version of LyX at any time. I know that there might also be changes in the LyX file format. If that happens and I won't be able to adapt my files to the new format, I will still be able to finish my thesis, as my current version works very well and I have to hand it in by the end of March. Due to the time frame stepping back to 1.5.4 is no option for me: there are already too many changes in the file format regarding the layout modules for example. Dominik
Re: Different program listing styles
Dominik Böhm wrote: > > Please do not use 1.6.0svn for any serious work. It is simply not ready. > > I have been using 1.6.0svn since 1,5 months for my diploma thesis and > it has been working really great, yet. This program listing problem is > the first "serious" problem that I am experiencing with 1.6.0svn. So, > I would say for me is it ready, but maybe I am not using all the > features. Nevertheless: It's a development version, and even if it's working rather well currently, it might be break and become unusable and eat your docs the next hour, if some developer is in the mood (or has a bad day). So do not use it for serious work such as a diploma thesis, unless you really think your diploma thesis is worthless. Jürgen
Re: Different program listing styles
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dominik Böhm wrote: > > > Please do not use 1.6.0svn for any serious work. It is simply not ready. > > > > I have been using 1.6.0svn since 1,5 months for my diploma thesis and > > it has been working really great, yet. This program listing problem is > > the first "serious" problem that I am experiencing with 1.6.0svn. So, > > I would say for me is it ready, but maybe I am not using all the > > features. > > Nevertheless: It's a development version, and even if it's working rather > well > currently, it might be break and become unusable and eat your docs the next > hour, if some developer is in the mood (or has a bad day). So do not use it > for serious work such as a diploma thesis, unless you really think your > diploma thesis is worthless. I am aware of the fact that there are risks involved using LyX for serious work. But rest assured that my files are safe: I use an SVN-server for my thesis and upload my work to the server twice a day. Thus, I might loose about 4 hours of it at maximum. Further I upload my files each time I update LyX to make sure that apparent bugs don't ruin my work. With other words I am well prepared for the day LyX stops working: I can switch back to my last version of LyX at any time. I know that there might also be changes in the LyX file format. If that happens and I won't be able to adapt my files to the new format, I will still be able to finish my thesis, as my current version works very well and I have to hand it in by the end of March. Due to the time frame stepping back to 1.5.4 is no option for me: there are already too many changes in the file format regarding the layout modules for example. Dominik
Different program listing styles
Hello, I would like to use the program listing inset for Java-Code, XML-Code and some custom code and was wondering, if it's possible to define different styles for it. So, how can I differentiate between a Java-Code listing and an XML-Code listing? The highlighting will be different and maybe I would like to use different options. I hope there is another solution that doing it with an ERT-inset... Further I am wondering, why the listing's captions are above the listing and not beneath it (as we're used from figures). Best regards and thanks Dominik
Re: Different program listing styles
Dominik Böhm wrote:
Hello,
I would like to use the program listing inset for Java-Code, XML-Code
and some custom code and was wondering, if it's possible to define
different styles for it. So, how can I differentiate between a
Java-Code listing and an XML-Code listing? The highlighting will be
different and maybe I would like to use different options.
I hope there is another solution that doing it with an ERT-inset...
Insert - Program Listing, then right click the handle of the listing
widget. Select your language (Java or XML) from the list on the main
settings tab (lower left). Click the advanced tab and enter any
keyword=value pairs in the box. Note that if you want to use colors,
you need to add \usepackage{xcolor} (or \usepackage{color}?) in the
preamble; the listings widget does not add it automatically.
Further I am wondering, why the listing's captions are above the
listing and not beneath it (as we're used from figures).
It's the default for the listings package. I guess the author likes his
captions on the top. In the advanced tab, add the option 'captionpos=b'
to move the caption to the bottom.
/Paul
Re: Different program listing styles
Thanks for your quick answer, Paul.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dominik Böhm wrote:
Insert - Program Listing, then right click the handle of the listing
widget. Select your language (Java or XML) from the list on the main
settings tab (lower left). Click the advanced tab and enter any
keyword=value pairs in the box. Note that if you want to use colors,
you need to add \usepackage{xcolor} (or \usepackage{color}?) in the
preamble; the listings widget does not add it automatically.
Maybe it's a bug in LyX 1.6.0svn: I don't find the handle of the
listing inset. When I right click on it, the popup menu has only one
option No action defined!. What am I missing?
Further I am wondering, why the listing's captions are above the
listing and not beneath it (as we're used from figures).
It's the default for the listings package. I guess the author likes his
captions on the top. In the advanced tab, add the option 'captionpos=b'
to move the caption to the bottom.
I think this question will be anwered as soon as I can open the
listing's settings window.
Dominik
Re: Different program listing styles
Maybe it's a bug in LyX 1.6.0svn: I don't find the handle of the listing inset. When I right click on it, the popup menu has only one option No action defined!. What am I missing? Please do not use 1.6.0svn for any serious work. It is simply not ready. Bo
Re: Different program listing styles
I hope there is another solution that doing it with an ERT-inset... Insert - Program Listing, In case you do not know, inset-file-child document-listings allows you to insert files (or lines of files), and you can set global listings parameters in document-settings. There are many options for listings and you would better read listings manual if you plan to use listings extensively. Bo
Re: Different program listing styles
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe it's a bug in LyX 1.6.0svn: I don't find the handle of the listing inset. When I right click on it, the popup menu has only one option No action defined!. What am I missing? Please do not use 1.6.0svn for any serious work. It is simply not ready. I have been using 1.6.0svn since 1,5 months for my diploma thesis and it has been working really great, yet. This program listing problem is the first serious problem that I am experiencing with 1.6.0svn. So, I would say for me is it ready, but maybe I am not using all the features. I know how to handle the listings package by hand with ERT-insets, but I would rather like to have some GUI-support :-) Thanks anyways, maybe this feature will be working, soon. If not, I'll switch back to ERT-insets. Dominik
Re: Different program listing styles
This program listing problem is the first serious problem that I am experiencing with 1.6.0svn. So, I would say for me is it ready, but maybe I am not using all the features. Right now, the context dialog is overridden by context menu (a new feature of 1.6.x). This should be fixed soon. I know how to handle the listings package by hand with ERT-insets, but I would rather like to have some GUI-support :-) I usually insert listings as child document because this allows me to modify them from outside of lyx, and because the space/tab support of the listings inset is not optimal. Maybe you can try this as well. Cheers, Bo
Different program listing styles
Hello, I would like to use the program listing inset for Java-Code, XML-Code and some custom code and was wondering, if it's possible to define different styles for it. So, how can I differentiate between a Java-Code listing and an XML-Code listing? The highlighting will be different and maybe I would like to use different options. I hope there is another solution that doing it with an ERT-inset... Further I am wondering, why the listing's captions are above the listing and not beneath it (as we're used from figures). Best regards and thanks Dominik
Re: Different program listing styles
Dominik Böhm wrote:
Hello,
I would like to use the program listing inset for Java-Code, XML-Code
and some custom code and was wondering, if it's possible to define
different styles for it. So, how can I differentiate between a
Java-Code listing and an XML-Code listing? The highlighting will be
different and maybe I would like to use different options.
I hope there is another solution that doing it with an ERT-inset...
Insert - Program Listing, then right click the handle of the listing
widget. Select your language (Java or XML) from the list on the main
settings tab (lower left). Click the advanced tab and enter any
keyword=value pairs in the box. Note that if you want to use colors,
you need to add \usepackage{xcolor} (or \usepackage{color}?) in the
preamble; the listings widget does not add it automatically.
Further I am wondering, why the listing's captions are above the
listing and not beneath it (as we're used from figures).
It's the default for the listings package. I guess the author likes his
captions on the top. In the advanced tab, add the option 'captionpos=b'
to move the caption to the bottom.
/Paul
Re: Different program listing styles
Thanks for your quick answer, Paul.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dominik Böhm wrote:
Insert - Program Listing, then right click the handle of the listing
widget. Select your language (Java or XML) from the list on the main
settings tab (lower left). Click the advanced tab and enter any
keyword=value pairs in the box. Note that if you want to use colors,
you need to add \usepackage{xcolor} (or \usepackage{color}?) in the
preamble; the listings widget does not add it automatically.
Maybe it's a bug in LyX 1.6.0svn: I don't find the handle of the
listing inset. When I right click on it, the popup menu has only one
option No action defined!. What am I missing?
Further I am wondering, why the listing's captions are above the
listing and not beneath it (as we're used from figures).
It's the default for the listings package. I guess the author likes his
captions on the top. In the advanced tab, add the option 'captionpos=b'
to move the caption to the bottom.
I think this question will be anwered as soon as I can open the
listing's settings window.
Dominik
Re: Different program listing styles
Maybe it's a bug in LyX 1.6.0svn: I don't find the handle of the listing inset. When I right click on it, the popup menu has only one option No action defined!. What am I missing? Please do not use 1.6.0svn for any serious work. It is simply not ready. Bo
Re: Different program listing styles
I hope there is another solution that doing it with an ERT-inset... Insert - Program Listing, In case you do not know, inset-file-child document-listings allows you to insert files (or lines of files), and you can set global listings parameters in document-settings. There are many options for listings and you would better read listings manual if you plan to use listings extensively. Bo
Re: Different program listing styles
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe it's a bug in LyX 1.6.0svn: I don't find the handle of the listing inset. When I right click on it, the popup menu has only one option No action defined!. What am I missing? Please do not use 1.6.0svn for any serious work. It is simply not ready. I have been using 1.6.0svn since 1,5 months for my diploma thesis and it has been working really great, yet. This program listing problem is the first serious problem that I am experiencing with 1.6.0svn. So, I would say for me is it ready, but maybe I am not using all the features. I know how to handle the listings package by hand with ERT-insets, but I would rather like to have some GUI-support :-) Thanks anyways, maybe this feature will be working, soon. If not, I'll switch back to ERT-insets. Dominik
Re: Different program listing styles
This program listing problem is the first serious problem that I am experiencing with 1.6.0svn. So, I would say for me is it ready, but maybe I am not using all the features. Right now, the context dialog is overridden by context menu (a new feature of 1.6.x). This should be fixed soon. I know how to handle the listings package by hand with ERT-insets, but I would rather like to have some GUI-support :-) I usually insert listings as child document because this allows me to modify them from outside of lyx, and because the space/tab support of the listings inset is not optimal. Maybe you can try this as well. Cheers, Bo
Different program listing styles
Hello, I would like to use the program listing inset for Java-Code, XML-Code and some custom code and was wondering, if it's possible to define different styles for it. So, how can I differentiate between a Java-Code listing and an XML-Code listing? The highlighting will be different and maybe I would like to use different options. I hope there is another solution that doing it with an ERT-inset... Further I am wondering, why the listing's captions are above the listing and not beneath it (as we're used from figures). Best regards and thanks Dominik
Re: Different program listing styles
Dominik Böhm wrote:
Hello,
I would like to use the program listing inset for Java-Code, XML-Code
and some custom code and was wondering, if it's possible to define
different styles for it. So, how can I differentiate between a
Java-Code listing and an XML-Code listing? The highlighting will be
different and maybe I would like to use different options.
I hope there is another solution that doing it with an ERT-inset...
Insert -> Program Listing, then right click the "handle" of the listing
widget. Select your language (Java or XML) from the list on the main
settings tab (lower left). Click the advanced tab and enter any
keyword=value pairs in the box. Note that if you want to use colors,
you need to add \usepackage{xcolor} (or \usepackage{color}?) in the
preamble; the listings widget does not add it automatically.
Further I am wondering, why the listing's captions are above the
listing and not beneath it (as we're used from figures).
It's the default for the listings package. I guess the author likes his
captions on the top. In the advanced tab, add the option 'captionpos=b'
to move the caption to the bottom.
/Paul
Re: Different program listing styles
Thanks for your quick answer, Paul.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dominik Böhm wrote:
> Insert -> Program Listing, then right click the "handle" of the listing
> widget. Select your language (Java or XML) from the list on the main
> settings tab (lower left). Click the advanced tab and enter any
> keyword=value pairs in the box. Note that if you want to use colors,
> you need to add \usepackage{xcolor} (or \usepackage{color}?) in the
> preamble; the listings widget does not add it automatically.
Maybe it's a bug in LyX 1.6.0svn: I don't find the "handle" of the
listing inset. When I right click on it, the popup menu has only one
option "No action defined!". What am I missing?
> > Further I am wondering, why the listing's captions are above the
> > listing and not beneath it (as we're used from figures).
>
> It's the default for the listings package. I guess the author likes his
> captions on the top. In the advanced tab, add the option 'captionpos=b'
> to move the caption to the bottom.
I think this question will be anwered as soon as I can open the
listing's settings window.
Dominik
Re: Different program listing styles
> Maybe it's a bug in LyX 1.6.0svn: I don't find the "handle" of the > listing inset. When I right click on it, the popup menu has only one > option "No action defined!". What am I missing? Please do not use 1.6.0svn for any serious work. It is simply not ready. Bo
Re: Different program listing styles
> > I hope there is another solution that doing it with an ERT-inset... > > Insert -> Program Listing, In case you do not know, inset->file->child document->listings allows you to insert files (or lines of files), and you can set global listings parameters in document->settings. There are many options for listings and you would better read listings manual if you plan to use listings extensively. Bo
Re: Different program listing styles
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe it's a bug in LyX 1.6.0svn: I don't find the "handle" of the > > listing inset. When I right click on it, the popup menu has only one > > option "No action defined!". What am I missing? > > Please do not use 1.6.0svn for any serious work. It is simply not ready. I have been using 1.6.0svn since 1,5 months for my diploma thesis and it has been working really great, yet. This program listing problem is the first "serious" problem that I am experiencing with 1.6.0svn. So, I would say for me is it ready, but maybe I am not using all the features. I know how to handle the listings package "by hand" with ERT-insets, but I would rather like to have some GUI-support :-) Thanks anyways, maybe this feature will be working, soon. If not, I'll switch back to ERT-insets. Dominik
Re: Different program listing styles
> This program listing problem is > the first "serious" problem that I am experiencing with 1.6.0svn. So, > I would say for me is it ready, but maybe I am not using all the > features. Right now, the context dialog is overridden by context menu (a new feature of 1.6.x). This should be fixed soon. > I know how to handle the listings package "by hand" with ERT-insets, > but I would rather like to have some GUI-support :-) I usually insert listings as child document because this allows me to modify them from outside of lyx, and because the space/tab support of the listings inset is not optimal. Maybe you can try this as well. Cheers, Bo
