On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 09:12:21PM +0200, ben wrote:
Besides, you can always mask the change by adding a catalog, in which the public
ID of the DTD points to the previous actually used DTD. For instance you can
put:
PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V4.1//EN /usr/lib/sgml/docbook.dtd
Not
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 09:12:21PM +0200, ben wrote:
Besides, you can always mask the change by adding a catalog, in which the public
ID of the DTD points to the previous actually used DTD. For instance you can
put:
PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V4.1//EN /usr/lib/sgml/docbook.dtd
Not
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 09:12:21PM +0200, ben wrote:
>
> Besides, you can always mask the change by adding a catalog, in which the public
> ID of the DTD points to the previous actually used DTD. For instance you can
> put:
>
> PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook V4.1//EN" "/usr/lib/sgml/docbook.dtd"
Yannick Patois a écrit :
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
The processing tools are the same. The stylesheets need for it are the
same. The only thing new that you need it is the dobcook dtd for 4.1.
This is already available for most of the linux distributions
Yannick Patois a écrit :
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
The processing tools are the same. The stylesheets need for it are the
same. The only thing new that you need it is the dobcook dtd for 4.1.
This is already available for most of the linux distributions
Yannick Patois a écrit :
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > The processing tools are the same. The stylesheets need for it are the
> > same. The only thing new that you need it is the dobcook dtd for 4.1.
> >
> > This is already available for most of the linux
Hi,
this is a quest for people using docbook lyx backend.
We intend to support docbook 4.1 in the next stable version. The
convertion will bring no cost to the users, since actually no lyx code
changes, only the exported docbook is different.
Is there anyone insterested in docbook 3.1
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
Hi,
this is a quest for people using docbook lyx backend.
We intend to support docbook 4.1 in the next stable version. The
convertion will bring no cost to the users, since actually no lyx code
changes, only the exported
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:39:44AM +0200, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
I dont know what tools are needed to process v4 docbook documents.
If my tools (openjade:I: OpenJade version 1.3) are enough, or if the
upgrade (on linux) is easily available then a switch to 4.1 is OK for me.
The
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
The processing tools are the same. The stylesheets need for it are the
same. The only thing new that you need it is the dobcook dtd for 4.1.
This is already available for most of the linux distributions that I know
of for long time.
Hi,
this is a quest for people using docbook lyx backend.
We intend to support docbook 4.1 in the next stable version. The
convertion will bring no cost to the users, since actually no lyx code
changes, only the exported docbook is different.
Is there anyone insterested in docbook 3.1
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
Hi,
this is a quest for people using docbook lyx backend.
We intend to support docbook 4.1 in the next stable version. The
convertion will bring no cost to the users, since actually no lyx code
changes, only the exported
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:39:44AM +0200, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
I dont know what tools are needed to process v4 docbook documents.
If my tools (openjade:I: OpenJade version 1.3) are enough, or if the
upgrade (on linux) is easily available then a switch to 4.1 is OK for me.
The
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
The processing tools are the same. The stylesheets need for it are the
same. The only thing new that you need it is the dobcook dtd for 4.1.
This is already available for most of the linux distributions that I know
of for long time.
Hi,
this is a quest for people using docbook lyx backend.
We intend to support docbook 4.1 in the next stable version. The
convertion will bring no cost to the users, since actually no lyx code
changes, only the exported docbook is different.
Is there anyone insterested in docbook 3.1
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> this is a quest for people using docbook lyx backend.
>
> We intend to support docbook 4.1 in the next stable version. The
> convertion will bring no cost to the users, since actually no lyx code
> changes, only the exported
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:39:44AM +0200, Yannick Patois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I dont know what tools are needed to process v4 docbook documents.
> If my tools (openjade:I: OpenJade version "1.3") are enough, or if the
> upgrade (on linux) is easily available then a switch to 4.1 is OK for me.
The
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> The processing tools are the same. The stylesheets need for it are the
> same. The only thing new that you need it is the dobcook dtd for 4.1.
>
> This is already available for most of the linux distributions that I know
> of for long
18 matches
Mail list logo
