Am Montag 13 Juli 2009 04:01:01 schrieb rgheck:
That said, there probably is a bug here, especially now that we have
this default master setting. A child should probably inherit the
document class of its master, and its modules and such, too. I'm not
sure how well we do with that.
Only if it
On 07/12/2009 12:57 PM, James Mansion wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
On 07/12/2009 07:46 AM, James Mansion wrote:
I may be doing the wrong thing - but I stared trying to write a book
with each Part in a separate document so I can edit (and version
control) them in more manageable chunks.
This
On 07/13/2009 02:07 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag 13 Juli 2009 04:01:01 schrieb rgheck:
That said, there probably is a bug here, especially now that we have
this default master setting. A child should probably inherit the
document class of its master, and its modules and such,
Am Montag 13 Juli 2009 15:30:46 schrieben Sie:
Only if it is exported with the master-buffer-* lfuns. The default master
is not supposed to exclude stand-alone usage.
Yes, I know: I use the master buffer thing all the time, for which thank
you. What I meant was: Maybe there should
Am Montag 13 Juli 2009 04:01:01 schrieb rgheck:
That said, there probably is a bug here, especially now that we have
this default master setting. A child should probably inherit the
document class of its master, and its modules and such, too. I'm not
sure how well we do with that.
Only if it
On 07/12/2009 12:57 PM, James Mansion wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
On 07/12/2009 07:46 AM, James Mansion wrote:
I may be doing the wrong thing - but I stared trying to write a book
with each Part in a separate document so I can edit (and version
control) them in more manageable chunks.
This
On 07/13/2009 02:07 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag 13 Juli 2009 04:01:01 schrieb rgheck:
That said, there probably is a bug here, especially now that we have
this default master setting. A child should probably inherit the
document class of its master, and its modules and such,
Am Montag 13 Juli 2009 15:30:46 schrieben Sie:
Only if it is exported with the master-buffer-* lfuns. The default master
is not supposed to exclude stand-alone usage.
Yes, I know: I use the master buffer thing all the time, for which thank
you. What I meant was: Maybe there should
Am Montag 13 Juli 2009 04:01:01 schrieb rgheck:
> That said, there probably is a bug here, especially now that we have
> this "default master" setting. A child should probably inherit the
> document class of its master, and its modules and such, too. I'm not
> sure how well we do with that.
Only
On 07/12/2009 12:57 PM, James Mansion wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
On 07/12/2009 07:46 AM, James Mansion wrote:
I may be doing the wrong thing - but I stared trying to write a book
with each Part in a separate document so I can edit (and version
control) them in more manageable chunks.
This
On 07/13/2009 02:07 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag 13 Juli 2009 04:01:01 schrieb rgheck:
That said, there probably is a bug here, especially now that we have
this "default master" setting. A child should probably inherit the
document class of its master, and its modules and such,
Am Montag 13 Juli 2009 15:30:46 schrieben Sie:
> > Only if it is exported with the master-buffer-* lfuns. The default master
> > is not supposed to exclude stand-alone usage.
> >
> >
>
> Yes, I know: I use the master buffer thing all the time, for which thank
> you. What I meant was: Maybe
I may be doing the wrong thing - but I stared trying to write a book
with each Part in a separate document so I can edit (and version
control) them in more manageable chunks.
This seems to be working though I find the inability to nest inclusions
a bit disturbing.
What is more worrying is
Richard Heck wrote:
On 07/12/2009 07:46 AM, James Mansion wrote:
I may be doing the wrong thing - but I stared trying to write a book
with each Part in a separate document so I can edit (and version
control) them in more manageable chunks.
This seems to be working though I find the inability
On 07/12/2009 12:57 PM, James Mansion wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
On 07/12/2009 07:46 AM, James Mansion wrote:
I may be doing the wrong thing - but I stared trying to write a book
with each Part in a separate document so I can edit (and version
control) them in more manageable chunks.
This
I may be doing the wrong thing - but I stared trying to write a book
with each Part in a separate document so I can edit (and version
control) them in more manageable chunks.
This seems to be working though I find the inability to nest inclusions
a bit disturbing.
What is more worrying is
Richard Heck wrote:
On 07/12/2009 07:46 AM, James Mansion wrote:
I may be doing the wrong thing - but I stared trying to write a book
with each Part in a separate document so I can edit (and version
control) them in more manageable chunks.
This seems to be working though I find the inability
On 07/12/2009 12:57 PM, James Mansion wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
On 07/12/2009 07:46 AM, James Mansion wrote:
I may be doing the wrong thing - but I stared trying to write a book
with each Part in a separate document so I can edit (and version
control) them in more manageable chunks.
This
I may be doing the wrong thing - but I stared trying to write a book
with each Part in a separate document so I can edit (and version
control) them in more manageable chunks.
This seems to be working though I find the inability to nest inclusions
a bit disturbing.
What is more worrying is
Richard Heck wrote:
On 07/12/2009 07:46 AM, James Mansion wrote:
I may be doing the wrong thing - but I stared trying to write a book
with each Part in a separate document so I can edit (and version
control) them in more manageable chunks.
This seems to be working though I find the inability
On 07/12/2009 12:57 PM, James Mansion wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
On 07/12/2009 07:46 AM, James Mansion wrote:
I may be doing the wrong thing - but I stared trying to write a book
with each Part in a separate document so I can edit (and version
control) them in more manageable chunks.
This
21 matches
Mail list logo
